|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total) |
| |
The Rutificador chile | |
Total: 919,503 Year: 6,760/9,624 Month: 100/238 Week: 17/83 Day: 0/0 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Creation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
Since sons of god are best interpreted as angels, that means spirits.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 9.1
|
Noah knew when he saw that fresh leaf from a tree that the thousands of animals were no able to leave the ark. Fast growing grass and trees mean lots of food now. That is the best interpretation. Fiction is the best explanation.What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4597 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 9.1 |
Since sons of god are best interpreted as angels, that means spirits. I thought humans were the sons of god? Why would that mean spirits? I have always wondered, do you think angels are more closely related to birds (because they have feathers) or insects (because they have 3 pairs of appendages)? Two arms, two legs, and two wings, how cool is that. What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
creation writes:
Fast-growing trees is not an explanation at all because there is no such thing as fast-growing trees. Noah knew when he saw that fresh leaf from a tree that the thousands of animals were no able to leave the ark. Fast growing grass and trees mean lots of food now. That is the best interpretation.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
creation writes:
Whether it was continents or tiny islands is not relevant. The land was separated from the water and the dry land appeared. It says the water and land were separated. It does not say that continents were formed then.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
creation writes:
No it isn't.
Since sons of god are best interpreted as angels...quote: quote:etc. And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
Yes, it is. The title sons of god is best associated with angels in the OT.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
So?? Of course the land appeared.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
What there is no such thing as...now has no bearing on what things exist in the future or the far past.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
"In the passages from Job and Psalms it is applied to supernatural beings or angels. In Job the "sons of God" are represented as appearing before the throne of Yahweh in heaven, ready to do Him service, and as shouting for joy at the creation of the earth, In the Psalms they are summoned to celebrate the glory of Yahweh, for there is none among them to be compared to Him. The phrase in these passages has no physical or moral reference. These heavenly beings are called "sons of God" or "sons of the 'elohim" simply as belonging to the same class or guild as the 'elohim, just as "sons of the prophets" denotes those who belong to the prophetic order (see A.B. Davidson, Commentary on Job 1:6)."
Sons Of God - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Son of Man Junior Member (Idle past 2191 days) Posts: 26 From: Ireland Joined: |
Creation is a future prologue
Genesis 1 to 2.2 is a future prologue to the whole Bible, these things have yet to come, one clue to this is held within Creation day six that God created man in our own image, both man and woman?God (as a single entity) our image (more than one entity)? taken from the definitive revised English version Edited by Son of Man, : noticed mistake and added to inc. sourcethe first will be the last and the last will be the first.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
creation writes:
"Best' is just your unsupported opinion. Another, more straightforward, interpretation is that the "sons of God' were the offspring of Seth - i.e. the "good" offspring of Adam, as opposed to the offspring of Cain, who were the "bad" offspring of Adam. The title sons of god is best associated with angels in the OT.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
creation writes:
You claimed in Message 1215 that, "It says the water and land were separated. It does not say that continents were formed then." I'm just pointing out that the land was the continents. So?? Of course the land appeared.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 670 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
creation writes:
It really does. If there are no fast-growing trees now, there's no reason to think there were fast-growing trees in Noah's time. Fast-growing trees are contra-indicated by everything we know about biology, chemistry, physics, etc. What there is no such thing as...now has no bearing on what things exist in the future or the far past.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
creation Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 654 Joined: |
Since you have no clue either way, I would not value your hunches.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024