Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8984 total)
59 online now:
Newest Member: Jerry Johnson
Post Volume: Total: 877,356 Year: 9,104/23,288 Month: 119/1,544 Week: 394/518 Day: 62/57 Hour: 5/5

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Exposing the naturalistic theory. Part 1
Member (Idle past 363 days)
Posts: 123
Joined: 08-25-2017

Message 1 of 2 (844306)
11-27-2018 9:39 PM


With so many facts disputing the naturalistic theory I’ve decided to lay out the biggest ones individually. As this is presented to public school students as a fact Im going to use the higher scientific standards of evidence which is used in the applied sciences where evidence has to be 100% accurate. I may also use the standard of evidence “beyond reasonable doubt” as required by criminal law. Not the “balance of probability” which is used in civil law. That means anything speculative will be deemed unacceptable.

A false representation of an evolutionary tree that would be typically presented as factual to young school kids.

Part 1. The Cambrian explosion. Darwin’s Doubt.

The Cambrian explosion of life has long been a major hurdle for the naturalistic theory. The fossil record shows the first three quarters of the earth’s history to have nothing but very simply structured organisms. Then all of the sudden, 542 million years ago, vast quantities of complex creatures emerged without any of the evolutionary precursors demanded from Darwin’s theory.

In fact Darwin himself was perplexed by this event and in his book stated; “It’s as though they were just planted there without any evolutionary history”. He concluded that the fossil record was incomplete and said “To the question of why we do not find rich fossil deposits belonging to these…periods prior to the Cambrian system, I can give no satisfactory answer”. This fact caused great doubt in Darwin’s mind. He proposed that the fossil evidence was yet to be found and that without it his theory would collapse.

Since publishing his book, “The origin of species”, there have been new discoveries. Advanced life forms from the Cambrian era were discovered all around the world. However the findings only served to refute Darwin’s theory as there was no evolutionary species found for the Cambrian animals.

It is clear that the fossil record does not support Darwin’s theory of a common ancestor but in fact it undoubtedly refutes it. Yet the Cambrian explosion is not even mentioned in many text books and when it is mentioned it is not presented as evidence against Darwin’s theory but instead as an event that requires no further justification.

Similar situations also occur throughout time including the period after the extinction of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. This is where many modern animals, including primates, appear without any evolutionary evidence.

From observing the fossil data of the pre Cambrian period we should find evidence of evolution and a common ancestor as predicted by Darwin. We find no such evidence therefore, as Darwin himself knew, the theory is falsified. It also fails both criminal and civil legal standards of evidence.

The image shows Darwins prediction compared to the actual fossil data

Edited by Porkncheese, : No reason given.

Posts: 3920
Joined: 09-26-2002

Message 2 of 2 (844310)
11-28-2018 12:15 AM

Thread Copied to Biological Evolution Forum
Thread copied to the Exposing the naturalistic theory. Part 1 thread in the Biological Evolution forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020