Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creation
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1224 of 1482 (843284)
11-15-2018 8:00 PM
Reply to: Message 1219 by ringo
11-09-2018 10:39 AM


Re: Creation
What there is no such thing as...now has no bearing on what things exist in the future or the far past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1219 by ringo, posted 11-09-2018 10:39 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1229 by ringo, posted 11-16-2018 11:20 AM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1225 of 1482 (843286)
11-15-2018 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 1218 by Tanypteryx
11-08-2018 6:44 PM


Re: Creation
"In the passages from Job and Psalms it is applied to supernatural beings or angels. In Job the "sons of God" are represented as appearing before the throne of Yahweh in heaven, ready to do Him service, and as shouting for joy at the creation of the earth, In the Psalms they are summoned to celebrate the glory of Yahweh, for there is none among them to be compared to Him. The phrase in these passages has no physical or moral reference. These heavenly beings are called "sons of God" or "sons of the 'elohim" simply as belonging to the same class or guild as the 'elohim, just as "sons of the prophets" denotes those who belong to the prophetic order (see A.B. Davidson, Commentary on Job 1:6)."
Sons Of God - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1218 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-08-2018 6:44 PM Tanypteryx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1226 by Son of Man, posted 11-16-2018 6:26 AM creation has not replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1230 of 1482 (843581)
11-19-2018 1:59 PM
Reply to: Message 1217 by Tanypteryx
11-08-2018 6:36 PM


Re: Creation
Since you have no clue either way, I would not value your hunches.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1217 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-08-2018 6:36 PM Tanypteryx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1232 by Phat, posted 11-19-2018 2:07 PM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1231 of 1482 (843582)
11-19-2018 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 1229 by ringo
11-16-2018 11:20 AM


Re: Creation
If we assumed nature was the same you might have a point. Too bad you need a reason to do so. Got any?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1229 by ringo, posted 11-16-2018 11:20 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1233 by ringo, posted 11-19-2018 2:21 PM creation has replied
 Message 1237 by Tanypteryx, posted 11-19-2018 3:25 PM creation has not replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1238 of 1482 (843658)
11-20-2018 1:37 AM
Reply to: Message 1233 by ringo
11-19-2018 2:21 PM


Re: Creation
Science claims nature was the same, it needs a reason.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1233 by ringo, posted 11-19-2018 2:21 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1245 by ringo, posted 11-20-2018 10:50 AM creation has not replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1239 of 1482 (843659)
11-20-2018 1:39 AM
Reply to: Message 1232 by Phat
11-19-2018 2:07 PM


Re: Creation
As much as you may chose to believe his hunches, he has NO evidence of any same nature in the past.
When it comes to beliefs about creation, I suppose I expect so called believers of the bible to side with creation. Otherwise I know they are impostors.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1232 by Phat, posted 11-19-2018 2:07 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1241 by Arkangel Daniel, posted 11-20-2018 4:44 AM creation has not replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1261 of 1482 (844184)
11-26-2018 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 1228 by ringo
11-16-2018 11:17 AM


Re: Creation
If there was water and land together, and then it was separated, we were left with land as well as water. I have no reason to doubt that in the beginning a large land mass existed that later broke apart.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1228 by ringo, posted 11-16-2018 11:17 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1262 by Phat, posted 11-26-2018 1:47 PM creation has replied
 Message 1267 by ringo, posted 11-27-2018 11:14 AM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1265 of 1482 (844236)
11-27-2018 2:20 AM
Reply to: Message 1262 by Phat
11-26-2018 1:47 PM


Re: Creation
I think the battle is spiritual, and against lies and anything that opposes and exalts itself against God and His word. Not against people...flesh and blood.
Science has evidence that there once was a large land mass...not on why and exactly how it separated.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1262 by Phat, posted 11-26-2018 1:47 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1268 by ringo, posted 11-27-2018 11:24 AM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1270 of 1482 (844276)
11-27-2018 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 1267 by ringo
11-27-2018 11:14 AM


Re: Creation
Semantics game eh? Whatever you like to call it that existed after creation eventually broke up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1267 by ringo, posted 11-27-2018 11:14 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1272 by ringo, posted 11-27-2018 7:41 PM creation has not replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1271 of 1482 (844278)
11-27-2018 4:52 PM
Reply to: Message 1268 by ringo
11-27-2018 11:24 AM


Re: Creation
Or...we could spin a ball covered in frozen chocolate real fast suddenly, and see if it fractures...and maybe see if we get a pattern like the mid ocean ridges where it separates...or...we could..etc etc. Why would we imagine your belief based scenarios?
Since evolving/changing happened fast in the former times/nature, we should view the changes that happened as gifts of adaptability from God in a former nature where it happened fast. (not as some insane godless freakfest that happened slowly in this current nature, and started from pond slime or thermal vent sludge, or comet crud!)
Edited by creation, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1268 by ringo, posted 11-27-2018 11:24 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1273 by ringo, posted 11-27-2018 7:48 PM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1275 of 1482 (844366)
11-28-2018 6:39 PM
Reply to: Message 1273 by ringo
11-27-2018 7:48 PM


Re: Creation
How would we know the mechanism that started the plates moving? Have you forgotten that the theories of plate tectonics have only guessed?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1273 by ringo, posted 11-27-2018 7:48 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1278 by ringo, posted 11-29-2018 11:01 AM creation has replied

  
creation
Member (Idle past 1942 days)
Posts: 654
Joined: 01-22-2017


Message 1283 of 1482 (844535)
12-01-2018 2:22 PM
Reply to: Message 1278 by ringo
11-29-2018 11:01 AM


Re: Creation
Glad you admitted that! You only look at and go by present processes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1278 by ringo, posted 11-29-2018 11:01 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1284 by Phat, posted 12-01-2018 2:42 PM creation has not replied
 Message 1287 by ringo, posted 12-02-2018 1:35 PM creation has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024