Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,765 Year: 4,022/9,624 Month: 893/974 Week: 220/286 Day: 27/109 Hour: 3/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

A Year In Intelligent Design

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Year In Intelligent Design
caffeine
Member (Idle past 1050 days)
Posts: 1800
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Joined: 10-22-2008

Normal Thread Display

(2)
Message 49 of 50 (844710)
12-04-2018 12:07 PM 		Reply to: Message 42 by Stile
12-03-2018 2:21 PM

Re: Creation Science vs Regular Science
The only way for Science to disagree on the conclusion of a test is to do the test again and show an error in the previous test (generally resulting in Nobel Prizes for catching an error.)
Which would still result in only 1 valid test - and only 1 valid conclusion.
​
I think you have to find an error in something pretty important to get a Nobel prize - if they handed them out every time someone fixed a mistake there'd be a lot more laureates.
​
Edited by caffeine, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Stile, posted 12-03-2018 2:21 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024