|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Christianity and the End Times | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9504 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8
|
Phat writes: Why cannot there be an idea before a human mind defines it? Why must ideas be contained only in human minds? Because ideas can only exist in physical minds. They're not freefloating entities that we can trap and use. If you think they are you're going to have explain how and where. I'm pretty sure I seen monkeys have ideas too. They get the lightbulb look. One day machines might be able to have ideas and if we ever find any, ET too. But it takes a physical thing to have a thought.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.I am Finland. Soy Barcelona "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
The one who is afraid is you - afraid of letting go of your fixed idea of God. If we did find an entity that was completely different from your pet god, most of us would be more willing to accept it than you would. Quit being so afraid of speculating on WHO or WHAT "did it".And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
ringo writes: My "pet" God is rational. Certainly not limited to the one you compile from the book. Certainly not a mere Loki, or Bigfoot, or some other human creation. The one who is afraid is you - afraid of letting go of your fixed idea of God. If we did find an entity that was completely different from your pet god, most of us would be more willing to accept it than you would. Basically an initial Creator of all seen and unseen. A source for the fodder for Big Bangs. An initial source. An eternal conduit of creativity and encouragement. A validation that human minds are not all that we have to bank on. An insurance policy of Hope for an uncertain future with fallible humans likely to blow themselves up if left to their own instincts. Why must your qualification for acceptance hinge on something different from that? I suspect it will be because you discovered and defined it rather than it defining you. Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
How can you call it rational when you can't provide reasons for its irrational behaviour?
My "pet" God is rational. Phat writes:
Again, the book is the only source you have. Everything else is made up.
Certainly not limited to the one you compile from the book. Phat writes:
How is any of that rational?
Basically an initial Creator of all seen and unseen. A source for the fodder for Big Bangs. An initial source. An eternal conduit of creativity and encouragement. A validation that human minds are not all that we have to bank on. An insurance policy of Hope for an uncertain future with fallible humans likely to blow themselves up if left to their own instincts. Phat writes:
"It defining you" is the epitome of irrationality. Why must your qualification for acceptance hinge on something different from that? I suspect it will be because you discovered and defined it rather than it defining you.And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9504 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8
|
Phat writes: Basically an initial Creator of all seen and unseen. A source for the fodder for Big Bangs. An initial source. An eternal conduit of creativity and encouragement. That's basic theism
A validation that human minds are not all that we have to bank on. An insurance policy of Hope for an uncertain future with fallible humans likely to blow themselves up if left to their own instincts. And that's wishful thinking.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.I am Finland. Soy Barcelona "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
Tangle writes: This explains why its easier for science to believe that in the beginning, matter reacted rather than an idea or thought to be the initial cause. Science has conditioned you to always require the physical before the mental. ...ideas can only exist in physical minds. They're not free-floating entities that we can trap and use. (...)it takes a physical thing to have a thought. How would I be able to show you otherwise? That would be Gods job.
ringo writes: Are you suggesting that "you defining it" is more rational? How can a "you" that existed in the last seconds of Carl Sagan's cosmic calendar define the other 365 days and 83,520 seconds? Why does the definition emerge in the last seconds of a cosmic year calendar than it would in the first second? "It defining you" is the epitome of irrationality.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
Tangle writes: So in essence, the beginning of modern science and wisdom used in defining the universe and all that is seen and unseen didn't start until humans evolved enough to begin our cognitive processes? And that's wishful thinking.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
ringo writes: Are you thus arguing that the book is *not* made up? Again, the book is the only source you have. Everything else is made up.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
Of course. Humans are the only things in the universe known to define anything.
ringo writes:
Are you suggesting that "you defining it" is more rational? "It defining you" is the epitome of irrationality. Phat writes:
Because a definition is - by definition - something that humans use to describe a human idea. Why does the definition emerge in the last seconds of a cosmic year calendar than it would in the first second?And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
Are there any ideas that are not human ideas?
Is reality a human idea? Are we to conclude that anything a human cannot define or describe does not exist for all practical purposes?Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
Of course the book is made up - but at least it's stable. What you make up is strictly ad hoc. You make up a touchy-feely God and then try to link it somehow with the Jesus who IS in the book. Are you thus arguing that the book is *not* made up?And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9504 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
Phat writes: This explains why its easier for science to believe that in the beginning, matter reacted rather than an idea or thought to be the initial cause. How many times Phat?? Science doesn't believe anything. It forms conclusions from evidence.
Science has conditioned you to always require the physical before the mental. Sciences studies both the 'mental' and the physical. It's able to do this because the 'mental' is physical. The 'mental' happens inside a physical organ called the brain. Did you have somewhere else in mind (sic) for this idea to exist?
How would I be able to show you otherwise? That would be Gods job. Right, You know it exists but sadly it's invisible and leaves no physical trace.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.I am Finland. Soy Barcelona "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
We've been through that already. Are there any paintings that are not made of paint?
Are there any ideas that are not human ideas? Phat writes:
Reality is what it is regardless of any human ideas about it.
Is reality a human idea? Phat writes:
"For all practical purposes", certainly. Try walking into a store and asking for something that you can't define or describe. Are we to conclude that anything a human cannot define or describe does not exist for all practical purposes?And our geese will blot out the sun.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18310 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
ringo writes:
OK, lets go back to The History Of Our World In 18 Minutes which is a made up concept known as Big History. What you make up is strictly ad hoc.The author concludes that "the universe" creates its own complexity. How is this not also ad hoc? Reality is what it is regardless of any human ideas about it. Cant argue with you there.
Are there any paintings that are not made of paint? Are there any universes that *may* exist that we cannot yet define or describe? If we correlate the word paint to the word idea, we thus hypothetically have possible universes, multiverses, or dare i say Gods that exist as ideas not yet defined. Edited by Phat, : No reason given.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9504 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
Phat writes: So in essence, the beginning of modern science and wisdom used in defining the universe and all that is seen and unseen didn't start until humans evolved enough to begin our cognitive processes? In as much as I can understand that, defining and understanding the universe couldn't have started until we obtained the conscious ability to do it. Surely that is obvious? We started the process by making up stories to 'explain' things - hence your current beliefs. Science continues this process but in a rational way, based on observation and objective testing in order to separate the real from the imaginary.Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London.I am Finland. Soy Barcelona "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024