The Right Side of the News

we don't have Mueller's summary we have Barr's. And Barr's summary does not claim that there was no evidence of collusion but that it "did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities." which is not the same thing as "no evidence". he couldn't exonerate trump on the claim of obstruction of justice in regards to the firing of Comey. Again at least that's what Barr's summary claims. The investifation did find criminal activity, that's why there have been, multiple indictments, guilty pleas and a conviction.Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.

Again there isn't "no evidence". just that they could not establish collusion (again according to Barr's summary of the report).

Here is a link to Barr's summary, where does he claim that the Mueller invesigation found "no evidence"Read Attorney General William Barr’s Summary of the Mueller Report - The New York Times

so the various criminal charges, guilty pleas and convictions were all faked? Where did Mueller say there was no evidence of collusion Faith? The report hasn't been released, all we have is Barr's summary. Where in the summary are the words "no evidence of collusion". what lie? According to the summary the report does not prove obstruction nor does it exonerate the president of obstruction. Being accused of something and being found not guilty does not mean that your accusers were lying.

we have his personal lawyer's sworn statement that he was directed by Trump to pay off the women he had affairs with, these payments would be violations of campaign finance laws.

He also has the cancelled checks from Trump reimbursing him. But you've now gone from "no shred of evidence" to "i don't believe this evidence". talking heads on the TV aren't the justice system, they don't determine what is and isn't a crime.

Confederate statues celebrate the people who kept slaves and became traitors to the United States of America in order to keep keeping slaves. Fuck the confederacy, there are no good people on that side.

The germans manage to preserve their history without putting up statues of hitler.

He just fought for a system that viewed other human beings as inferior and which sought to keep them as property and profit off their misery. he owned slaves. And even though his feelings on the matter of slavery were mixed he still viewed blacks as inferior to whites Honorable people who wanted to keep other humans as slaves.in short: Fuck robert e lee, and the rest of the sister fucking hillbillies who would defend the confederacy.

yes the person who thinks the enslavement of black people is a bad thing is the racist. You're a fucking idiot.

oh please Faith you're always whining about the "enemy of the people" and here you are bending over backwards to defend literal enemies of your country. what kind of person would respect someone who fought to preserve the institution of slavery?Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.

I've never owned slaves, that puts me wayyyyyyyyyyyyy above Robert E Lee and any other confederate shitbags in terms of morals. it's not the history of the south, it's the history of the confederacy and the history of the Confederacy is the institution of slavery and the oppression of black people, fuck anybody who would try to defend that.

as soon as you stop your defence of white supremacy.

and we all live in a virtual reality simulation created by robots that use our bodies as batteries. i saw it in a movie, it must be true.

one side was Nazis/Supporters of the confederacy/sister-fucking hillbillies, fuck those assholes and fuck anyone who's stupid/racist enough to think that there's fine people among them.Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.