Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,405 Year: 3,662/9,624 Month: 533/974 Week: 146/276 Day: 20/23 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Methods of Historical Science to demystify the process for the public:
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4411
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


(1)
Message 11 of 33 (848668)
02-12-2019 9:34 PM


Wow, a good old fashioned Gish Gallop. No evidence, just a bunch of PRATTs.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Theodoric, posted 02-12-2019 10:00 PM Tanypteryx has seen this message but not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4411
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


(1)
Message 22 of 33 (848696)
02-13-2019 8:31 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by candle2
02-13-2019 7:53 PM


Re: Evidence
The HGP proved conclusively that there was a human population bottleneck. MtDNA and Y chromosomes clearly point to four men and four women around 4500 years ago.
You are going to have to do better than this. Show us a reference to scientific papers reporting that anything you said here is true.
It is known that humans are degrading. Each successive generation has over 100 more mutations than the previous one.
Sorry, this is incorrect. Every individual, on average, has 100 new mutations that were not in their parent's genome, so that's millions of new mutations per generation.
Considering that we live longer and healthier than our ancestors, it would seem your claim that the mutations are "degrading" humans is bullshit.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by candle2, posted 02-13-2019 7:53 PM candle2 has not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4411
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.4


(2)
Message 29 of 33 (850782)
04-14-2019 12:17 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by candle2
04-14-2019 6:40 AM


Wrong! Wolves, dogs, foxes, dingoes, and coyotes are of the same kind. Sometimes they do interbreed, but the results are always the same: all offsprings are of the same kind.
So, you are saying wolves give birth to dingoes and foxes give birth to wolves and dogs give birth to coyotes because they are all the same kind?
Don't take this personally, because it is not meant that way. But, none of the animals in this group (kind) can produce an offspring of a different kind; only a total idiot would suggest otherwise.
Don't take this personally, but only a lying idiot would would claim, right to our faces, that we suggest that.
When someone says "don't take it personally" they mean you should take it personally.
Evolutionists scream and squeal that it is possible (for a male and a female of the same kind to reproduce an offspring of a different kind) if we allow billions of years for this to happen. But, this isn't science; it is fantasy.
This is your fantasy. You are making false claims (lies) about evolution and the scientists who study it. You made this up and cannot document any scientist saying it.
I u/s that evolutionists claim this process occurs in small incremental steps, but that which is impossible remains impossible, regardless of the amount of time involved.
Profound.
Evolutionists confuse"variation" within a species as micro evolution (which is a misnomer). Then they make a jump to macro by adding long periods of time.
Evolutionary biologists on the other hand recognize that variation within species are the results of mutations and that there are new mutations in every generation. This leads to the obvious conclusion that each and every generation has a slightly different genetic makeup than the parent generation. This has been documented millions of times.
Observable science clearly proves that kind produce kind.
Science has documented that the genetic makeup of every offspring is slightly different genetically from the parents.
You are a typical ignorant creationist who makes totally false claims about evolution and then makes more false claims that are unsupported by any scientific evidence that you have refuted your strawman.
We have seen hundreds of your kind here over the years and not once has any documented evidence supported your silly arguments.
You should take everything I said here personally.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by candle2, posted 04-14-2019 6:40 AM candle2 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Faith, posted 04-14-2019 12:56 PM Tanypteryx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024