The Right Side of the News

I knew I had heard of this group. Unabashed racists.

quote:

---

In August 2018, FAIR's former press secretary, Joe Gomez, filed a complaint with the Washington, D.C. Office of Human Rights, alleging racist, xenophobic, and ableist harassment at FAIR. Gomez alleges that he was called a "spic" by a fellow employee, that FAIR's communications director would often address him with Spanish phrases and that other colleagues would sometimes fake a Hispanic accent. He also accused FAIR's president of asking Gomez to raise his arm (he suffered from anxiety that caused him to shake) and laughed while Gomez's arm shook.

---

SPLC classifies them as a hate group. Anti-Catholic right up your alley. I will go through there study and see what facts they actually use. Should be a hoot.

Cato institute, a very non-liberal organization, has already destroyed this study.

quote:

---

FAIR’s report reaches that conclusion by vastly overstating the costs of illegal immigration, undercounting the tax revenue they generate, inflating the number of illegal immigrants, counting millions of U.S. citizens as illegal immigrants, and by concocting a method of estimating the fiscal costs that is rejected by all economists who work on this subject.

---

https://www.cato.org/...gal-immigration-study-fatally-flawedI seem to remember you presenting this in the past and destroying it then too. Recycling old debunked arguments?

Classic Faith.

quote:

---

Don't confuse me with the facts. My mind is made up.

---

Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Wrong!
You might want to know a little about the subjects you are discussing.

But that is not what you have claimed is it.

Some of the information Michael Steele presented cam from Russian sources. The dossier did not originate in Russia. To make such a claim is to not be accurate and confuses the facts. Accuracy is not nit pickery. It is presenting the actual facts not some fever dream manipulation of the facts.

You know that isn't what GOP voter suppression is doing. You are still a racist.

Faith is a troll and a racist. She knows the actual facts but doesn't care because her religious hate is more important.

But neither you or donnie's voting commission could find any evidence. If you have the evidence present it, if you don't shut up about it. Because claiming otherwise would be a lie. But neither you or donnie's voting commission could find any evidence of this being an actual issue.
If you have the evidence present it, if you don't shut up about it. Because claiming otherwise would be a lie.

Faith's response to this(if there is one) will certainly expose the morality she possesses. Though we have seen plenty examples so far.

Multiple examples of wrongful convictions leading to execution.
Wrongful execution - Wikipedia

Your morals are warped and disgusting.

Oh she is so brave. Whined like a baby and lied when they arrested her. Doesn't even have the conviction of her own beliefs and own up to what she did. Hypocritical loser.

Please define what are?
The term makes no sense.

I don't really want to listen to your idiocy. Here an actual scholar destroys the whole notion. Remember Jonah Goldberg is a grifter and a fraud. He only says what he says to make money off of the rubes.The Scholarly Flaws of "Liberal Fascism" | History News Network

quote:

---

Jonah Goldberg tells us he wrote this book to get even. The liberals started it by “insist[ing] that conservatism has connections with fascism” (p. 22). Conservatives “sit dumbfounded by the nastiness of the slander” (p. 1). “The left wields the term fascism like a cudgel” (p. 3). So Jonah Goldberg has decided it is time to turn the tables and show that “the liberal closet has its own skeletons” (p. 22). After years of being “called a fascist and a Nazi by smug, liberal know-nothings” he decides that “responding to this slander is a point of personal privilege” (p. 392).
Feeling oneself a victim is wonderfully liberating. Anything goes. So Jonah Goldberg pulls out all the stops to show that fascism “is not a phenomenon of the right at all. It is, and always has been, a phenomenon of the left” (p. 7). The reader perceives at once that Goldberg likes to put things into rigid boxes: right and left, conservative and liberal, fascist and non-fascist. He doesn’t leave room for such complexities as convergences, middle grounds, or evolution over time. Thus Father Coughlin was always a man of the left, and so was Mussolini (Giacomo Matteotti or the Rosselli brothers, leaders of the Italian left whom Mussolini had assassinated, would have been scandalized by this view). The very mention of a “Third Way” puts one instantly into the fascist box.

---

If you could read I would tell you to read the whole article. But you won't.