|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1464 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Right Side of the News | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Oh, I forgot to include: word is he's a pretty good golfer and could win quite often without cheating.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
The Impact of the 2018 Trade War on U.S. Prices and Welfare
quote: Which, of course, is obvious to anyone left or right who gives the most cursory thought to the question. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Remember Female Genita Mutilation?
There's been a law against it for 20 years.
quote: Worker threw exception | www.rawstory.com | Cloudflare
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Wow, so many lies.
Muller explicitly told Barr when Barr asked if he'd misrepresented the report in his four page note on its principal points that no, he hadn't. Muller said he was bothered by the media coverage but not that Barr had misrepresented the report. But the false story sticks anyway.
Sorry, the story is true. Mueller made it clear that Barr had misrepresented the report and the media had nothing to do with it.
quote: Trump WAS exonerated of obstruction of justice
Trump was not exonerated. Volume two contains hard evidence that Trump obstructed justice at least 10 times and would be indicted except for the DOJ opinion that the President could not be indicted while president.
Nevertheless they've been screaming for Barr to break the law and let them see the whole thing.
Wrong. The Democrats have been screaming to see the unredacted parts of the report that Barr can legally release to COngress. We're also asking that Barr and the Democrats request a judge to release the Grand Jury testimony. Whatever the judge decides the losing party will appeal and the Supreme Court will have the final say. If Barr refuses to join the request the Democrats may take further legal action. All lawful and common. Edited by JonF, : No reason given. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
917 of them as of now. STATEMENT BY FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS. There's an updated CSV there.
quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Dupe.
Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
There were all the elements for an obstruction charge. As has already been pointed out Mueller did not indict because DOJ policy does not allow indicting a sitting President.
In the report he made it clear that's the only reason he didn't seek an indictment. I"ve read enough of it for myself to know that's true. Of course you'd never hear that truth from your sources.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Nope, as usual. It"s not one or the other.
He didn"t find sufficient evidence for a collusion indictment. He did find some evidence. So he didn't exonerate anyone. . The obstruction lie has been covered in this thread already. Denying it doesn't affect reality. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
Nope. It's against DOJ policy to indict a sitting President,no matter how criminal he is.
You're pretty slow on the uptake.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Then why did you say the repoft exonerated him?
There's a lot of possibilities you're ignoring between charges and exoneration He explicitly would have brought charges except for DOJ policy, not for any lack of evidence. Repeating latantly false and long*debunked claims doesn't change reality.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
917 former Federal prosecutors.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf is the official electronic copy.
They printed it, scanned it, and OCR"d it, so there are many OCR errors.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Dupe. .
Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
No, as the quote already posted showed, the report clearly stated that they didn't seek indictments because of the DOJ policy. When I get b to my computer I will dig out a quote if one isn't posted by then.
Meanwhile you will dig up a quote showing "It was clearly stated that the policy against indicting a sitting President had absolutely no part in the conclusions of the report", right? Mueller found lots of evidence of collusion, just not enough to support criminal prosecution. Mueller presented strong evidence of Trump’s obstructions and explicitly stated that he was following DOJ policy by not indicting him. Otherwise Trump would be indicted.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Of course she couldn't, and if she could she wouldn't. She cares not for trurh, just stoking her hate and rage.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024