Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Electro-mechanical engines of Perpetual Motion and Natural Selection
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 137 of 202 (85369)
02-11-2004 11:14 AM
Reply to: Message 136 by Dr Cresswell
02-11-2004 10:17 AM


Re: HE IS A NUTCASE - PURE AND SIMPLE
You simply could not stay away could you? Like the male polecat sniffing for his old scent markings. You do not breed on this patch anymore. Thats called Evolution.
Monkeys do not type. You confuse them with mathematical statisticians.
How strange that I never get e-mails intended for you. I find you evasive, shallow and ignorant and utterly incapable of indepedent and original thinking.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 10:17 AM Dr Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 11:29 AM Alan Cresswell has replied
 Message 141 by Percy, posted 02-11-2004 12:30 PM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 138 of 202 (85371)
02-11-2004 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 133 by Zero
02-11-2004 6:56 AM


Don't worry about maths. Just make sure that everthing you do has a spin velocity component. That gets you there.
[This message has been edited by Alan Cresswell, 02-11-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Zero, posted 02-11-2004 6:56 AM Zero has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 11:36 AM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Dr Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 139 of 202 (85372)
02-11-2004 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 137 by Alan Cresswell
02-11-2004 11:14 AM


Re: HE IS A NUTCASE - PURE AND SIMPLE
quote:
I find you evasive
Well, I think if you answer the questions that have been posed for you first then you may consider calling others evasive. And, in English please. Simply, clearly, without all your strange allusions to irrelevancies. Preferably backed up by maths that is recognisable as maths. Oh, and while you're at it using conventional meanings for words like "energy" and "power".
quote:
shallow and ignorant
Hmm, who around here knows no more physics than a couple of buzz-words and names of physicists? Who hasn't bothered to engage in discussions elsewhere on this forum? (OK, I admit it's been a few months since I posted here)
quote:
utterly incapable of indepedent and original thinking
Well, the examiners of my PhD thesis thought I did OK in that regard. And the referees of several research papers. In science original work is done by building on the work of others, "standing on the shoulders of giants" as some have said, not throwing out what is currently known on a whim. Or do you mean "independant and original" to be the kind of thoughts produced by indulgance in hallucinogenic substances?
I'm wondering just which Alan Cresswell these comments refer too ... anyone else wish to comment who they fit best?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by Alan Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 11:14 AM Alan Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by Alan Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 4:56 PM Dr Cresswell has replied

  
Dr Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 140 of 202 (85375)
02-11-2004 11:36 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by Alan Cresswell
02-11-2004 11:21 AM


Do worry about maths
Remember, if you play around with numbers and symbols enough you can "prove" anything. All very clever, but unless you are rigourous in applying formal logic and mathematical convention there is no way any such "maths" will ever be taken seriously.
Get your maths right and your argument is irrefutable. Start by assuming 1=2 (or some equal mathematical stupidity) and it'll be treated as nothing more than a joke.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Alan Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 11:21 AM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22388
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 141 of 202 (85383)
02-11-2004 12:30 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by Alan Cresswell
02-11-2004 11:14 AM


Guidelines Update
Hi, All!
Alan Cresswell writes:
How strange that I never get e-mails intended for you. I find you evasive, shallow and ignorant and utterly incapable of indepedent and original thinking.
I hope everyone feels comfortable that the Forum Guidelines are being applied somewhat more leniently in this thread. I don't want to spoil the fun.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by Alan Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 11:14 AM Alan Cresswell has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Abshalom, posted 02-11-2004 5:27 PM Percy has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 142 of 202 (85451)
02-11-2004 4:56 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by Dr Cresswell
02-11-2004 11:29 AM


Re: HE IS A NUTCASE - PURE AND SIMPLE
Stop appealing for comments from anyone else. Stand on your own two feet and do not look for comfort through a herd instinct.
Applying the Conservation of Energy to a Bernoullui liquid spin vortex gives 2H=H. Elementary centrifugal force/spin chamber area. Maybe you feel the need for a peer review to discuss this. You clearly cannot handle it and pretend never to have read my stuff. You have though and could only prove me right but lack the ability to handle it properly.
The luvvies you call peers weighed your papers. They did not read beyond page one. Why is the world not reeling from your findings? Why do you look for comfort in a crowd?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 11:29 AM Dr Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by wj, posted 02-11-2004 5:29 PM Alan Cresswell has not replied
 Message 145 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 5:36 PM Alan Cresswell has replied

  
Abshalom
Inactive Member


Message 143 of 202 (85464)
02-11-2004 5:27 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by Percy
02-11-2004 12:30 PM


Re: Guidelines Update
Permissive Percy says, "I hope everyone feels comfortable that the Forum Guidelines are being applied somewhat more leniently in this thread. I don't want to spoil the fun."
Thanks, Percy, it is rather humorous even though I have no earthly idea which Cresswell is which, which is legit, or even if they both are one entity or maybe some sort of two-psyche, bicranial, Siamese-schizo twins.
Anyhow, will someone someday clue me in to the maths of it all?
Peace in Percyville.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Percy, posted 02-11-2004 12:30 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 5:40 PM Abshalom has replied

  
wj
Inactive Member


Message 144 of 202 (85466)
02-11-2004 5:29 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by Alan Cresswell
02-11-2004 4:56 PM


Re: HE IS A NUTCASE - PURE AND SIMPLE
The English love their eccentrics.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by Alan Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 4:56 PM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Dr Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 145 of 202 (85469)
02-11-2004 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by Alan Cresswell
02-11-2004 4:56 PM


Re: HE IS A NUTCASE - PURE AND SIMPLE
Well, fluid mechanics isn't my strong point but a quick Google is very informative. Within Bernoulli's theorem, the quantity H (incidentally, dimensions of energy per unit mass ... it's not clear at all on your page what you're using H for as nothing is clearly laid out with relevant dimensions) is assumed constant. So then using that to try to determine changes in H does seem a bit odd, to say the least.
quote:
The luvvies you call peers weighed your papers. They did not read beyond page one.
Well, judging by the fact that I've yet to receive a referees report that hasn't commented on things throughout the paper, I assume they did read the whole thing. On the otherhand, if anything you've submitted for publication is like your webpage I doubt anyone could manage to supress their hysterics to get beyond the first paragraph.
quote:
Why is the world not reeling from your findings?
Probably because I'm no more than a small cog in the big wheel that is good science. I've collected and reported a lot of data, maybe someday someone else will be able to use some of that data in formulating an earth shattering theory. I doubt it, but you never know.
I do know that as you show no evidence of either learning from, or contibuting to, the work of others you will always be just some nutter out there having no impact on the world of science apart from as some toy for people to play with. "Hey, want a good laugh? Look at this lunatic ... wants to tell us we're wrong and can't even tell the difference between force and energy"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by Alan Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 4:56 PM Alan Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by Alan Cresswell, posted 02-13-2004 12:09 PM Dr Cresswell has not replied

  
Dr Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 146 of 202 (85474)
02-11-2004 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by Abshalom
02-11-2004 5:27 PM


Re: Guidelines Update
I'm me, he's him ... I think
Yes, we are different people who just happen to have the same name. I'm legit, he's a loon.
And, don't worry about the maths ... it's total nonsense. A bit like trying to understand a sentance in English but written according to the rules of Chinese grammar. Except it's worse than that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Abshalom, posted 02-11-2004 5:27 PM Abshalom has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by Abshalom, posted 02-11-2004 5:57 PM Dr Cresswell has not replied

  
Abshalom
Inactive Member


Message 147 of 202 (85480)
02-11-2004 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by Dr Cresswell
02-11-2004 5:40 PM


It's All Greek to Me
Well, thanks. That totally clears it up for me, Doc.
Hmmmmm.
I am you are we and he is all together ... coo coo cah choo ...
[This message has been edited by Abshalom, 02-11-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 5:40 PM Dr Cresswell has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 148 of 202 (86085)
02-13-2004 12:09 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by Dr Cresswell
02-11-2004 5:36 PM


Re: HE IS A NUTCASE - PURE AND SIMPLE
Let peace and love reign today. Even for you my beloved. My Google window is full of hearts and cherubs and I am full of remorse for kicking your arse when I should have turned the other cheek and sent you flowers.
I am 66 on Sunday but if you send me a love card and a bottle of very, very cheap champagne, I shall change my name by deed poll and resign my position as the worlds leading intellectual.
Greater love have no man. Unless its you of course.
I miss you. My box is empty. I miss you ALL.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-11-2004 5:36 PM Dr Cresswell has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Eta_Carinae, posted 02-13-2004 1:09 PM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4374 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 149 of 202 (86117)
02-13-2004 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 148 by Alan Cresswell
02-13-2004 12:09 PM


You sir, are a
nut.
A pure and simple, 100%, case of dementia.
Question: Is your website meant as comic relief OR (what is more frightening and likely) do you really believe this nonsense?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by Alan Cresswell, posted 02-13-2004 12:09 PM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Melchior
Inactive Member


Message 150 of 202 (87959)
02-22-2004 10:04 AM


I would like some sort of step by step explanation of the
quote:
VI in = VI out + Eddy Current heat to cooling oil
to
quote:
ZERO = I2R Eddy current heat = conceivably EVERYTHING = -Mc2 fission
process.

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by Dr Cresswell, posted 02-26-2004 8:03 AM Melchior has replied
 Message 153 by Alan Cresswell, posted 02-28-2004 5:52 AM Melchior has replied

  
Dr Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 151 of 202 (88776)
02-26-2004 8:03 AM
Reply to: Message 150 by Melchior
02-22-2004 10:04 AM


Good luck. I asked the same question, in almost identical form, back in September and still haven't got a reply.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 150 by Melchior, posted 02-22-2004 10:04 AM Melchior has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by Melchior, posted 02-26-2004 8:29 AM Dr Cresswell has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024