Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8915 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-17-2019 8:23 AM
33 online now:
jar, Percy (Admin), Son Goku (3 members, 30 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Happy Birthday: lopezeast0211
Post Volume:
Total: 856,853 Year: 11,889/19,786 Month: 1,670/2,641 Week: 179/708 Day: 6/40 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
RewPrev1
...
1415161718
19
Author Topic:   Some states protect women's rights
vimesey
Member
Posts: 967
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011
Member Rating: 6.1


Message 271 of 283 (856813)
07-03-2019 6:17 AM
Reply to: Message 267 by ringo
07-02-2019 10:11 PM


Re: Partial birth abortion is not an accurate term
Can we please be very careful with the term “healthy”, when it is applied in relation to disability. My stepson is heavily autistic, for example, but that does not make him unhealthy.

Could there be any greater conceit, than for someone to believe that the universe has to be simple enough for them to be able to understand it ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 267 by ringo, posted 07-02-2019 10:11 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 274 by ringo, posted 07-03-2019 12:19 PM vimesey has responded

    
ringo
Member
Posts: 16806
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 272 of 283 (856843)
07-03-2019 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 269 by Sarah Bellum
07-02-2019 10:36 PM


Re: Partial birth abortion is not an accurate term
Sarah Bellum writes:

"One doctor reported that on some occasions a wrong diagnosis had been given and the dead foetus was found to have no disability"


So mistakes are made. Are you going to ban heart surgery because it doesn't always work?

It's becoming pretty obvious that "partial-birth abortion" is a lie.


All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-02-2019 10:36 PM Sarah Bellum has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 275 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-03-2019 12:28 PM ringo has responded

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 16806
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 273 of 283 (856844)
07-03-2019 12:17 PM
Reply to: Message 270 by Sarah Bellum
07-02-2019 10:37 PM


Re: Is the fetus a human being? Is it a living creature that we allow you to kill?
Sarah Bellum writes:

Like I said, you're standing by your story.


And like I said, nobody but you is objecting to my story. I can assure you that there are plenty of people around here who wouldn't hesitate to point it out if I was wrong.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 270 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-02-2019 10:37 PM Sarah Bellum has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 276 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-03-2019 12:32 PM ringo has responded

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 16806
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 274 of 283 (856845)
07-03-2019 12:19 PM
Reply to: Message 271 by vimesey
07-03-2019 6:17 AM


Re: Partial birth abortion is not an accurate term
vimesey writes:

Can we please be very careful with the term “healthy”, when it is applied in relation to disability.


If you can suggest a better word, I'll be glad to use it.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 271 by vimesey, posted 07-03-2019 6:17 AM vimesey has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 277 by vimesey, posted 07-03-2019 12:36 PM ringo has responded

  
Sarah Bellum
Member
Posts: 224
Joined: 05-04-2019
Member Rating: 2.4


Message 275 of 283 (856847)
07-03-2019 12:28 PM
Reply to: Message 272 by ringo
07-03-2019 12:13 PM


Re: Partial birth abortion is not an accurate term
I'll take that as an acknowledgement that your question has been answered.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 272 by ringo, posted 07-03-2019 12:13 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 278 by ringo, posted 07-03-2019 12:46 PM Sarah Bellum has responded

    
Sarah Bellum
Member
Posts: 224
Joined: 05-04-2019
Member Rating: 2.4


Message 276 of 283 (856849)
07-03-2019 12:32 PM
Reply to: Message 273 by ringo
07-03-2019 12:17 PM


Re: Is the fetus a human being? Is it a living creature that we allow you to kill?
Since you have agreed that substantial numbers of people agree that restrictions on late-term abortions are reasonable, your statement "nobody but you" about your use of the word "dictatorial" is incorrect.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 273 by ringo, posted 07-03-2019 12:17 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 279 by ringo, posted 07-03-2019 12:51 PM Sarah Bellum has acknowledged this reply

    
vimesey
Member
Posts: 967
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011
Member Rating: 6.1


Message 277 of 283 (856850)
07-03-2019 12:36 PM
Reply to: Message 274 by ringo
07-03-2019 12:19 PM


Re: Partial birth abortion is not an accurate term
With additional or special needs is fine.

Could there be any greater conceit, than for someone to believe that the universe has to be simple enough for them to be able to understand it ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 274 by ringo, posted 07-03-2019 12:19 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 280 by ringo, posted 07-03-2019 12:54 PM vimesey has responded

    
ringo
Member
Posts: 16806
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


(1)
Message 278 of 283 (856852)
07-03-2019 12:46 PM
Reply to: Message 275 by Sarah Bellum
07-03-2019 12:28 PM


Re: Partial birth abortion is not an accurate term
Sarah Bellum writes:

I'll take that as an acknowledgement that your question has been answered.


Yes, your inability to provide examples of partial-birth abortions has always been an answer to the question. It's not as conclusive as you openly admitting that it's a lie, but it will do.

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 275 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-03-2019 12:28 PM Sarah Bellum has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 282 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-03-2019 10:29 PM ringo has acknowledged this reply

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 16806
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 279 of 283 (856853)
07-03-2019 12:51 PM
Reply to: Message 276 by Sarah Bellum
07-03-2019 12:32 PM


Re: Is the fetus a human being? Is it a living creature that we allow you to kill?
Sarah Bellum writes:

Since you have agreed that substantial numbers of people agree that restrictions on late-term abortions are reasonable, your statement "nobody but you" about your use of the word "dictatorial" is incorrect.


That doesn't follow at all. If millions of people agree that the trains should run on time, that doesn't mean Mussolini was not a dictator.

But you're dishonest as well as wrong. I was refering to people HERE on EvC not objecting to my use of the word "dictatorial".

Edited by ringo, : No reason given.


All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 276 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-03-2019 12:32 PM Sarah Bellum has acknowledged this reply

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 16806
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 280 of 283 (856854)
07-03-2019 12:54 PM
Reply to: Message 277 by vimesey
07-03-2019 12:36 PM


Re: Partial birth abortion is not an accurate term
vimesey writes:

With additional or special needs is fine.


So we're talking about a fetus with special needs?

All that are in Hell, choose it. -- CS Lewis
That's just egregiously stupid. -- ringo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 277 by vimesey, posted 07-03-2019 12:36 PM vimesey has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 281 by vimesey, posted 07-03-2019 1:01 PM ringo has acknowledged this reply

  
vimesey
Member
Posts: 967
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011
Member Rating: 6.1


Message 281 of 283 (856855)
07-03-2019 1:01 PM
Reply to: Message 280 by ringo
07-03-2019 12:54 PM


Re: Partial birth abortion is not an accurate term
If you want to be particular about it, a foetus that will have additional or special needs, yes.

Could there be any greater conceit, than for someone to believe that the universe has to be simple enough for them to be able to understand it ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 280 by ringo, posted 07-03-2019 12:54 PM ringo has acknowledged this reply

    
Sarah Bellum
Member
Posts: 224
Joined: 05-04-2019
Member Rating: 2.4


Message 282 of 283 (856892)
07-03-2019 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 278 by ringo
07-03-2019 12:46 PM


Re: Partial birth abortion is not an accurate term
Have a nice day.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 278 by ringo, posted 07-03-2019 12:46 PM ringo has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 283 by Theodoric, posted 07-04-2019 9:21 AM Sarah Bellum has acknowledged this reply

    
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 6392
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.8


(1)
Message 283 of 283 (856929)
07-04-2019 9:21 AM
Reply to: Message 282 by Sarah Bellum
07-03-2019 10:29 PM


Re: Partial birth abortion is not an accurate term
Verifiable evidence is all we ask for. Instead you present an uncorroborated news story from a British tabloid paper. That is the sum total of your evidence? And now you are dismissive?

Good day, Ma'am.


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 282 by Sarah Bellum, posted 07-03-2019 10:29 PM Sarah Bellum has acknowledged this reply

    
RewPrev1
...
1415161718
19
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019