|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Did the Flood really happen? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I have no idea what you are talkinjg about, and leave my messages alone.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Faith writes: Uh huh, but there's no point in pretending I haven't answered a nonsensical point when I have, whether you like it or not. Continuing to pretend you have actually provided evidence that shows the geological is not continuing to grow and change over time is not actually providing evidence that shows the geological is not continuing to grow and change over time. What evidence is there that the process that has created the Geological Column as exists today does not continue?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Well, but I HAVE provided such evidence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ooh-child Member (Idle past 344 days) Posts: 242 Joined:
|
I guess I missed them. Faith, you say you post quite frequently from the public library? Look around you next time you're there. Books! Definitions! Explanations! Woo-hoo!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 168 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Well, it does speak of it as a "stack" while the ocean deposits aren't deep enough to be a stack
The pictures we have posted show lots of layers. A stack is "a pile of objects, typically one that is neatly arranged". They are a stack.
They are obviously newer than the geological column as we find it on all the continents,
Why? And, were that true, why would that be an issue?
the column does not exist on the sea floor
6,886 unsupported assertions which are contradicted by those definitions. 128,785,965,702 to go.
and since they do not build upon that familiar well known geological column that defines all the time periods it's not part of it.
Since they don't build upon your made-up version of the geologic column but do build on the geologic column as it is defined by everyone but you, it's part of the geologic column.
And may I also point out that since it is new and does not build on the geological column
No, you may not, because that's false as shown by those definitions. Of course you could produce a definition from some source other than you, except no such source exists. The definition of the geologic column does not restrict it to land. Edited by Admin, : The spaces in the 128 billion number made it hard to read, maybe just me, but removed them. Also, corrected typo in quote from Faith's message: continenents => continents
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DrJones* Member Posts: 2284 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 6.8
|
the column does not exist on the sea floor,
actually correct, the column is not on top of the sea floor, the column is under the sea floor. The top of the column under the ocean is the top surface of the ocean bed.It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds soon I discovered that this rock thing was true Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world And so there was only one thing I could do Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On *not an actual doctor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Faith writes: Well, but I HAVE provided such evidence. Then you can provide a link to the posts where you provided the information. Or stop lying. Whichever is easier.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4344 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.9
|
Faith writes:
Then you can provide a link to the posts where you provided the information. Well, but I HAVE provided such evidence. Or stop lying. Whichever is easier. What a dilemma, stop lying and tell the truth. Everyone here knows how that will go...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 168 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Well, but I HAVE provided endless repetition of my unsupported claims
FIFY Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 168 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Look at what I bolded in the "quote"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 168 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
Whichever is easier.
She literally can't. She is unable to detect any difference between her inventions and reality. She believes deep down in her soul that repeating claims is discussing and supporting. See Message 920 where she repeated her claim that the geologic column does not exist under the sea floor as "evidence" against the definitions that contradict it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1405 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Oh dear, the hubris of wanton ignorance ... so many erroneous assertions ...
Well, it does speak of it as a "stack" while the ocean deposits aren't deep enough to be a stack. ... The "stack" goes down to the bottom of the crust, so it does exist on the sea floor as the sediment there goes down to the crust.
... They are obviously newer than the geological column as we find it on all the continenents, ... ... because they are areas of net deposition, where the geological column is building. In contrast to you narrow vision myopic view of land geological columns that are in areas of net erosion -- part of the geological cycle pr message Message 913. You CAN educate yourself on this rather than try to make it all up.
... the column does not exist on the sea floor, and since they do not build upon that familiar well known geological column that defines all the time periods it's not part of it. It does exist on the sea floor because that is not the bottom of the crust. We can see this clearly from the ...
quote: See that gray layer of marine sediment being deposited on top of the green layer of "ocean crust (Basalt/Grabbro) ~5-7 km" thick? that is the geological column in those areas. Below that is the orange lithosphere mantle ... the top of this mantle layer is the bottom of the geological column in this area. The sedimentary deposits are in the process of forming the layer that will define the "anthropocen age". Time has not ended, it continues, just as the geological processes and cycles continue. Probably most notable for the high levels of radioactive material ...
And may I also point out that since it is new and does not build on the geological column, ... Except that it is built on the geological column/s in the ocean floor/s.
... AND the geologtical column IS found across continents, ... ... AND everywhere on earth, INCLUDING across the Oceans.
... AND the geologtical column IS found across continents, ... ... that were once ocean bottoms in the past.
... this alone is evidence for the deposition of the geological column before the continents split, which is evidence for the RFlood. Nope. It is evidence that the sedimentary deposits occurred when that area was under water, oceans covered much of NA in times past. Plate tectonics explains it, the flood does not.
Ba Da Boom. Or whatever. Only in your dreams. Bada BING. (so much fun) Enjoy Edited by RAZD, : .by our ability to understand RebelAmericanZenDeist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1405 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Well, but I HAVE provided such evidence. Looking only at areas of net erosion does not provide evidence that geological processes have ended. Why? Because you ignore area of net deposition where the geological column is actively growing. In fact the area of net erosion also show that geological processes have not stopped, because they are actively eroding ... and that sediment from the erosion is going somewhere ... Think about it, Faith. All you need to do is really think about that missing sediment ... what is it doing? Enjoyby our ability to understand RebelAmericanZenDeist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
The "stack" begins with precambrian rocks and ascends through the sedimentary layerss from Cambrian through Holocene, variations of which is what we find on the continents;
it does not exist on the sea floor. What is being laid down on the sea floor is therefore not building on the geological column. You guys are kidding yourselves. The Geological Column or Timescale is OVER AND DONE WITH. Ba Da Boom! Edited by Faith, : No reason given. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
There is no problem with defining the Geo Column as the strata we find in various forms on all the continents from Precambrian to Holocene. Nothing else is necessary to the definition and by this definition we have no further growth of the Geological Column. It is OVER AND DONE WITH.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024