I Know That God Does Not Exist

Not me, Love. The world wide community of scientists.Not at all like you in the Flud threads claiming only you are right and the whole rest of the world is wrong.Talk about fallen mind. Yours hit the bedrock base below that last sediment layer ages ago. You can't lie to me like that, M'Lady. I know better.

You really are ignorant of everything, aren't you.If all they got is a supposed eye witness the DA drops the case before the judge kicks his ass down the hall.

I do have a ton of independent corroboration for my claims about Christianity. Yes I do.And as for claiming to be right and the rest of the world wrong, the point is that I'mn the only YEC on the thread and I'm not going to give up my observations just because everybody else subscribes to the establishment OE/ToE point of view. I don't think that's quite the same thing. And I've often accepted something said by the opposition, but only when it supports my view of course.The Flood is right and the Old Earth is wrong. That's not me, that's an independent source.ABE: I do think that anyone with an independent fair mind would have to agree with me about most of it.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Not ONE eyewitness. You need a number of eyewitnesses to make a case. But in the usual court case these days witnesses are not all you have anyway. But the Bible ONLY has witnesses to the evidence for the reality of God and His nature. You believe them or you don't.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

No it doesn't.I said that it is possible to demonstrate that something doesn't exist - but it doesn't work in every case.

I have forgotten what the point was. lol.

You don't even know what an independent source would be.To you an *independent* is another religionist with the same weak ideas of what constitutes evidence. And that would include the millions of independent scientists around the world. Except they don't agree with you. In fact they ignore you and your handful of fellow religionist apologists because you views are so contrary to evidence you are not worth the effort to address.Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.

In other words you have nothing. Well, at least these days we get the "don't" choice instead of "believe them or get burned at the stake."And that's not because of anything your religion has done but because secular humanism rules the law.We just need to watch the republican's in chambers to know that if you could resurrect your old powers you would burn us all.Your religion, its party, and its adherents are evil.

Well no. But there must be SOME independent fair minded people out there somewhere.But your description is kind of like how to you an independent source is another biased OE/ToE believer whose bias is shared by the whole Scientific Community. Well, no it wouldn't because they absolutely could not entertain for half a minute that any argument for the Flood could be right. They wouldn't even give it a thought. At all. About anything. They are committed to the establishment view. That is not an independent mind. Exactly. Neither independent nor fair.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Haven't you just described yourself? Aren't you committed to flood geology, no matter what the evidence is?

Yes the papacy lost its power to do that at the Protestant Reformation. But if the Protestant Reformation hadn't defanged the Roman papal system there would never have been any secular humanism. Besides which the Reformation itself stopped the burnings at the stake and created modern civilization, and gave us the Constitution of the US.. I don't identify with the Republican party for your information.However, the papacy is still working on getting its political power back and if they ever do THEY might indeed burn you at the stake, and me as well. Actually they'd probably start with me. Be careful who you call evil because if you are wrong it's the "good guys" in your opinion who are going to turn on you.For all your study of history you sure didn't learn much that matters. But then that's typical for secular education.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

How would it even be possible to get the whole scientific community to share the same bias?

You think any of them dispute the OE/ToE?

Well of course not. They'd have to be insane, feeble-minded, etc. to dispute the ToE. But that's because of evidence, not bias. The reason everybody accepts that the world is round is because of evidence, not bias.

It's because they THINK there's evidence, but there really isn't much.But you were the one who said it wouldn't be possible to get the whole scientific community to share the same bias. But obviously they do. And of course it's bias. And so is the belief that they have evidence. They ASSUME they have evidence, they rarely check it out, and they certainly don't pay any attention to a YEC.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.