|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Right Side of the News | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
His BS is spreading as usual with no fact checking. I've seen it on two other right wing sites.
quote:Lots more screen shots at the link. How A Conspiracy Site Spread MisInformation About The El Paso Shooter Edited by JonF, : No reason given. Edited by JonF, : No reason given. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9140 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.3
|
I should remind him that in 1960, Louisiana had 3,257,022 people reside there, and over a quarter of the people were black. Blacks were mostly Republican then.
Not sure what this has to do with the 2000 Michigan primary. That is the primary that was meaningless. Absolutely nothing you posted here has anything to with my post. Just your typical random gobbledygook.Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9140 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.3
|
LaRouche received .7% of the total votes in all primaries that year. So how was he ripped off?
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LamarkNewAge Member Posts: 2313 Joined: |
quote: It has to do with Democrats being used to getting away with stealing their own votes, and preventing people from voting or being counted. It is a party tradition.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LamarkNewAge Member Posts: 2313 Joined: |
quote: His Arkansas delegates were ripped off. The media blackout. The fact that the Democratic party kept him off of some of the state ballots, like Georgia and Florida. (He got 1.91% in 2000, and 5.9% in 1996. Clinton got about 89% in 1996.) 2000 Democratic Party presidential primaries - Wikipedia LaRouche would have done better had there not been the dishonest reporting, which ignored everything LaRouche - to the point that they lied about candidates relative standing in the "fundraising race". He got more support than Bill Bradley at the March 25 Democratic Caucus in Wyoming. 7.28% verses 4.98%. Yet the media blackout was in full force. Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given. Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4409 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.4 |
LaRouche received .7% of the total votes in all primaries that year. So how was he ripped off? As a convicted felon it seems like he could not be U.S. President anyway, so how indeed was he ripped off?What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9140 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.3 |
So a non-sequitor
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
[tweet=1158548808323780608A]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
From Evangelical Warren Throckmorton Patheos Evangelical Blogger Says El Paso and Dayton Shootings Appear to be False Flag Operations (UPDATED) – Warren Throckmorton
quote:{emphasis in original}
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member
|
Once you’re familiar with the pattern, you’re able to identify them. Is the pattern "a shooting occurred"?It says something about the qualities of our current president that the best argument anyone has made in his defense is that he didn't know what he was talking about. -- Paul Krugman
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9140 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.3
|
Done here. All you are doing is a gish gallop. Throwing random crap out in order to pretend you have won the debate. You have moved the goal posts and changed your argument numerous times. You have posted so many strawman arguments it is impossible to even count them all. I am not even sure what your actual argument is.
Seemingly you think LaRouche would have been the Democratic candidate for President at some point. This is laughable on its face. There is no evidence of more than even a modicum of support for LaRouche as President. He was a felon and a nutball. He was a racist and an anti-Semite. He marketed himself as an amazing economist, but facts show he was wrong on almost all his predictions on the economy. It seems you are a member of the cult. Good for you.But like every time I get into a debate with you go total gish gallop and post random incoherent bs and gobbledygook. Like times before. I am done. Good day, Sir. Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
Juanita Jean (the world's most dangerous beauty salon) has the perfect reply. "We have those. They're called prisons."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LamarkNewAge Member Posts: 2313 Joined: |
quote: Talk about a "gish gallup"! "It seems you are a member of the cult" takes the cake. I can't even remember your initial issue. Wasn't it about delegates?
quote: When did I say that? You make up so much crap, that it is unreal. I almost did not quote anything, because I did not know where to start.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LamarkNewAge Member Posts: 2313 Joined: |
This post is a question to Theodoric. It has nothing to do with my views (infact very little of what I have said about the Democratic party process - involving LaRouche - is about my own views on political positions).
Theodoric said:
quote: Aside from anti-Semitic stuff,when did he make racist comments against anybody? Like during the time he ran for President (1976-2004) Please show evidence and have evidence from each decade, not some random b.s. (like LaRouche, while a guest on a radio program, laughing at a caller's "monkey" joke about Obama in 2010) As for the anti-Semitic stuff, here was a New York Times review (of the Dennis King book) from: George Johnson, an editor of The Week in Review of The New York Times, is the author of ''Architects of Fear: Conspiracy Theories and Paranoia in American Politics.''
quote: So, do you care to offer any actual substance, Theodoric. You are high on false accusations (which were based around issues that were NOT the topic anyway), so do you care to offer anything useful on these issues you choose to throw out? Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9140 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.3
|
And the gallop continues.
I apologize for being part of the problem that has led this thread astray. Those that know my style know that I will not stand aside and let historical revisionism go unchallenged. If anyone is following this conversation I will end my participation with a couple links to the many racist and anti-Semitic comments and positions of Larouche.
quote:Account Suspended Account Suspended LaRouche on Obama - background of racist rant I understand Lamark will dismiss all of this and probably not even read the information provided. All of the above links use original source material. As a matter of fact they have links to the original source material. Prior to this discussion I knew very little about LaRouche. I understood he was a manipulative conspiracy theorist that was a perennial candidate for President. My research to counter the revisionism presented took me down many rabbit holes. My research further supports the conclusion that he was a racist and an anti-Semite. After reading the evidence presented in the links above I think reasonable minds will agree. If anyone has reasoned arguments and evidence to challenge my conclusions please start a new thread. As LamarkNewAge will just continue to move goal posts, present strawmen and gishgallop(from his last post I am not sure he understands the term), I will not be responding to him on this subject again. I will continue to respond to any new historical revisionism he attempts to present.Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024