|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Corruption in the media and the political party nomination process | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LamarkNewAge Member (Idle past 738 days) Posts: 2236 Joined: |
I was in a discussion with Theodoric, and he offered me a link, which was attempting to show racism against blacks in Lyndon Larouche's writings. He said I had to start another thread if I challenged anything in the links.
Here was his link. Account Suspended Here was the part that caused me to find the actual article (I had to do a google past to find the PDF):
quote: I suspected the quote was out of context. I figured Theodoric's source might be attempting to make it look like LaRouche was calling African culture "disgusting". So I tracked down the source. https://larouchepub.com/...sh_of_the_nasdaq_informat-lar.pdf LaRouche actually said that Greeks got their culture from Egyptians (a very important issue in the American black community, mind you), and the Romans started the degeneration. He was attacking serfdom and slavery:"a form of serfdom is typical of ancient Mesopotamian cultures". He wrote an article that would be seen as complementary toward black contributions to the best of humanity's offerings. It was an article about the evolution of man, but he saw man as already having intrinsic abilities. It was a very theological article. He said Mandeville and Adam Smith saw man as a beast. That was the referent that the "Hence, those who, like unreconstructed relics of the Confederacy" referred back to. The Mesopotamian artistic depictions of man as part beast was also a derivation from Mandeville & Smith type of thinking.
quote: I just do not see this as LaRouche saying that he feels the "beast-men" status (chattel slavery) of African Americans during the Confederacy indicates they were legitimately & reasonably - to LaRouche - seen as such. It had nothing to do with anything LaRouche believes. Edited by LamarkNewAge, : No reason given. Edited by AdminPhat, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminPhat Inactive Member |
Thread copied here from the Critical thinking test:Question about a source's quote & citation another poster used thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LamarkNewAge Member (Idle past 738 days) Posts: 2236 Joined: |
EvC Forum: The Right Side of the News
I will attempt to engage any comments or debate with fellow posters. This is not going to be a particularly fun set of issues to address though. (For various reasons)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
OK, spell it out for me..(no links...just your motive for the topic)
You quoted: LNA writes: I only want to comment on the issue of LaRouche being a racist against blacks. So you and Theo opened this discussion. Am I to conclude that the motive of this topic is to defend larouche? If not, what is it that you want to talk about?
LNA writes: What specifically is it that you wish to educate/inform the peanut gallery about? Its a Free For All...I put you over here to give you a topic to run with. Is Theo wrong about Larouche or is this issue bigger than Larouche?? I will attempt to engage any comments or debate with fellow posters. This is not going to be a particularly fun set of issues to address though.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4344 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.9
|
Why does anyone care about LaRouche? He's dead and he was a nut. We used to watch his long conspiracy commercials on late night TV to make fun of him. He could never have become president because he was a convicted felon. He was a pathetic character.
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LamarkNewAge Member (Idle past 738 days) Posts: 2236 Joined: |
quote: It is not a defense of LaRouche on every issue related to ethnic attacks (I think his overall combination of anti-Zionism + the endlessly specific mentioning of Jewish ethnicity among individuals behind various "bad things" in history = anti-Semitic leanings), but it is a response to completely out-of-context quotations when it comes to issues specifically about the African race. It is the fact that LaRouche was attacked as a "racist" in extremely short media reports (when any coverage was extremely rare, and he was subject to a news media blackout) about him during his Presidential runs from 1976-2004. His anti-Semitic stuff (though not based on any racial theory, and not due to whatever "skin color" issues some might feel exist when looking at Jewish people) complicates the issue for sure, and to annoying levels. LaRouche was indeed anti-Semitic during every Presidential run from 1976-2004. But he was not racist against humans with dark skin, during his Presidential runs. (When one looks at historical reports from a 2019 vantage point, this issue is admittedly complicated by the fact that LaRouche did begin to spout racist words after 2007/2008, and they were all aimed at Obama)
quote: I think it is bigger than LaRouche. Much bigger. The whole LaRouche story gets to corruption in the media and the political party nomination process.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
I think it is bigger than LaRouche. OK. I edited the title of this thread, as a favor to you since your topics can become convoluted and scattered. Lets focus on corruption in the media and the political nomination process. Does that sound fair? Much bigger. The whole LaRouche story gets to corruption in the media and the political party nomination process.Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
Subjectivism may very well undermine Christianity.In the same way that "allowing people to choose what they want to be when they grow up" undermines communism.~Stile
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18262 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.1 |
LNA writes: Because Phat is no longer an administrator and cannot reply to you on a topic that has not been promoted. Moose has the call on this, so take it up with him. Phat has been farting about inflation for a while now. Economists used to say that any unemployment rate under 5% spelled inflation. It is about 1% in my city of 300,000 people. And there is, indeed, inflation. Why is Phat, now, refusing to phart out loud? For the record, consensus on inflation is far from settled. The government is addressing it with the Feds bag of tools and tricks, but the jury is out on what territory the US and Global economies now are in. What we really need to do with you is give you one thread (perhaps in Free For All) and let you blather on about each new topic that springs up in your head. We can call it LNAs Musings. Your topic would of course have to be approved and I no longer can do that. Edited by Phat, : spelling"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain " *** “…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”- Dr.John Lennox “A God without wrath brought men without sin into a Kingdom without judgment through the ministrations of a Christ without a Cross.” “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” — Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LamarkNewAge Member (Idle past 738 days) Posts: 2236 Joined: |
Yea, well:
I want to start an inflation thread, "Phat's Phartings"! 0% tariffs would bring inflation down, with an economic shoot-up that would create an inflationary cross-current. Any economic growth will create inflation - to a certain extent. Targeted regulations ( including price controls!) can do wonders against inflation. But one must understand the market & economic forces, so as not to create shortages. (Most simply do not understand economics at all, and it does not stop them from pontificating)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22392 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
If you display the Coffee House forum and peer just above the word "Topic", what does it say about new topics?
--Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 412 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
Phat said that? Strike me blind! OK, spell it out for me..(no links..."I call that bold talk for a one-eyed fat man!" -- Lucky Ned Pepper
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024