Did the Flood really happen?

The problem with your explanation; " They were eroded away as they uplifted."; is that that takes time. Millions of years.But Faith "knows" it all happened in the year of the flood and the few thousand years before the drawings were made.

Today that is true. What is Ocean base today is not the land. But much of what is today land was once Ocean base.The problem is that that is simply another piece of evidence that the Earth is NOT 6000 years old but rather billions of years old.

It doesn't matter how many times you repeat utter nonsense, it still remains nonsense; just boring nonsense.

Continuing to pretend you have actually provided evidence that shows the geological is not continuing to grow and change over time is not actually providing evidence that shows the geological is not continuing to grow and change over time.What evidence is there that the process that has created the Geological Column as exists today does not continue?

Then you can provide a link to the posts where you provided the information.Or stop lying.Whichever is easier.

If I have a stack of coins and I put a new coin on top, do I still have a stack of coins?

Yes, Faith, yes you are. And in fact that is exactly what is seen in reality; stacks that contain different types of rock. Of course not. And in fact that is exactly what is seen in reality; the cores in the geological column from different places will have differing layers of rock.Thank you Faith, you have just agreed that the geological column is still growing and that no two geological columns from different areas will be exactly the same.It really is that simple Faith.The Flood and Young Earth are simply silly.

Imagine a stack of coins with coins from many different countries. Now imagine that several different kids made stacks using the coins that they had found, again, coins from many different countries.Now imagine a scientist examining each of the different stacks. He will look at each coin and be able to tell what country it came from and even what type of coin it is.That's exactly what we see in the cores made all over the world, layers that can be identified individually showing the type of material and even it's source; whether it was from an ocean floor or lake bed or volcano or forest or river bed or desert or ...Each core from the geologic column from all over the earth is unique and each column is constantly changing; sometimes material being added and sometimes material being removed. But the changes all come at the very top of the stack.

Again, trying to take Baby Steps for Faith. See Message 1022.

And as a matter of fact it is possible to look at the cores and determine the original source of the materials in each layer as shown in the very images Faith included in one of her posts.

No Faith, despite your delusions the Bible is not a scientific text and since it is filled with contradictions and two mutually exclusive flood tales it would never qualify as a scientific text under ANY conditions.Reality once again shows you are wrong and even the Bible itself shows you are wrong.

That and physics, chemistry, geology, archeology, paleontology, radiometric data, anthropology and of course the Bible itself.

The Bible is filled with falsehoods, fantasy, contradictions and just plain errors.The two Flood Myths as well as the two Creation Myths and the Conquest of Canaan and the Exodus are just a few such examples.

You have no theory Faith and have never even shown that you have a clue what a theory is.But there is NO tectonic activity in either of the Flood myths and no model, mechanism, method, process or procedure for any flood to create mountain raising tectonic activity.The Biblical Floods are not alternative theories but just fantasy.AbE:You and your cult can create God and Bible in your image but you cannot create physics, chemistry, geology or reality in your image.Edited by jar, : see AbE:

Once again you are simply creating a Bible in your own image. There are no earthquakes mentioned in either Biblical Flood tale.