The Right Side of the News

LaRouche received .7% of the total votes in all primaries that year. So how was he ripped off?

So a non-sequitor

Done here. All you are doing is a gish gallop. Throwing random crap out in order to pretend you have won the debate. You have moved the goal posts and changed your argument numerous times. You have posted so many strawman arguments it is impossible to even count them all. I am not even sure what your actual argument is.
Seemingly you think LaRouche would have been the Democratic candidate for President at some point. This is laughable on its face. There is no evidence of more than even a modicum of support for LaRouche as President. He was a felon and a nutball. He was a racist and an anti-Semite. He marketed himself as an amazing economist, but facts show he was wrong on almost all his predictions on the economy.It seems you are a member of the cult. Good for you.
But like every time I get into a debate with you go total gish gallop and post random incoherent bs and gobbledygook. Like times before. I am done.
Good day, Sir.

And the gallop continues.I apologize for being part of the problem that has led this thread astray. Those that know my style know that I will not stand aside and let historical revisionism go unchallenged.If anyone is following this conversation I will end my participation with a couple links to the many racist and anti-Semitic comments and positions of Larouche.

quote:

---

We will present the grotesque spectacle of individuals and sections of the pop music business competing in racialist serf-identification, tribal genealogy, and racist psychosis--the psychological truth of the whole affair being perhaps best summarized in the racist and anti-Semitic adage of the old South, 'Jews are only Niggers turned inside out.'"

---

Account Suspended
Account SuspendedLaRouche on Obama - background of racist rantI understand Lamark will dismiss all of this and probably not even read the information provided. All of the above links use original source material. As a matter of fact they have links to the original source material.Prior to this discussion I knew very little about LaRouche. I understood he was a manipulative conspiracy theorist that was a perennial candidate for President. My research to counter the revisionism presented took me down many rabbit holes. My research further supports the conclusion that he was a racist and an anti-Semite. After reading the evidence presented in the links above I think reasonable minds will agree.If anyone has reasoned arguments and evidence to challenge my conclusions please start a new thread. As LamarkNewAge will just continue to move goal posts, present strawmen and gishgallop(from his last post I am not sure he understands the term), I will not be responding to him on this subject again. I will continue to respond to any new historical revisionism he attempts to present.

He is not showing them much support. He doesn't want to piss of the chinese government. He has no spine.

How about we look at the human rights abuses on our own southern border? Maybe lets some children out of the jails and concentration camps they are in. You seem to have your priorities put of whack.

Can you post the link to that quote? I would like to use it. It is a strong argument as to how much this admin is concealing the truth.

Your mantra continues to be.
"Do not confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up."

But you have no facts or evidence for you side. Absolutely none. If you did you would post them.

The vast majority are not here illegally. They are attempting to apply for asylum. The government will not allow them to apply. Thus the administration is manufacturing the crisis in order to he cruel and inhumane. The people being inflicted wit the most cruelty are children. People like you disgust me.

I care about the rule of law, the reputation of my country and the just treatment of all people. Especially children. Things you obviously do not care about.

The vast majority of people in the southern border ARE trying to go through proper channels. Seeking asylum is a proper legal channel.

You really should understand the subject matter before you speak.

quote:

---

To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.

---

Obtaining Asylum in the United States | USCIS
That would be the U.S. Government saying that.There is no way to apply for asylum abroad. That is not how it works.
PolitiFact | No, immigrants cannot apply for asylum at U.S. embassies or consulates abroad

quote:

---

A U.S. consulate or embassy is clearly outside the U.S., so you can’t apply for asylum at a U.S. consulate or embassy," said Stephen H. Legomsky, an emeritus professor at the Washington University School of Law in St. Louis who served as chief counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services from 2011 to 2013.

---

You should really research those alt-right talking points before you post them.

I myself am done letting fascists hurt and kill people. Sitting back and hoping they are nice is a failed tactic. They hit me or anyone else I hit back.Rise up.

Go take a flying leap. I will not miss you. I do not suffer fools and racists gladly.