Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8936 total)
256 online now:
Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus) (1 member, 255 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: martygraham
Post Volume: Total: 861,912 Year: 16,948/19,786 Month: 1,073/2,598 Week: 319/251 Day: 47/43 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   More on the “1st Century Mark” affair
PaulK
Member
Posts: 15395
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 1 of 4 (862120)
09-01-2019 6:42 AM


Blogger and academic Brent Nongbri has a series of posts on recent developments, starting here

The affair goes back to 2011 when Scott Carroll, Tweeted about a new Gospel fragment, older than any known. It really came to the fore in 2012 when conservative Bible scholar Daniel Wallace dropped the news as a bombshell in a debate with Bart Ehrman. Wallace indicated that it would be published in the near future, but it took until 2018 when it was revealed as a late 2nd or early 3rd Century manuscript.

In the meantime there were a lot of questions and claims about the manuscript - unsurprisingly given the claimed date and the lack of information. Most of the claims turned out to be false.

One of the mysteries in the affair was the ownership of the papyrus fragment. Although the fragment was eventually identified as belonging to the Egyptian Exploration Society it was earlier claimed that it had been bought for the Hobby Lobby Green Collection ( linked to their Museum of the Bible). Even though the EES denied that it had ever been for sale.

It seems that the Green Collection had signed a purchase agreement for it - and three other alleged “1st Century” Gospel fragments - but not from the EES. They had been buying it from Dirk Obbink, the respected papyrologist who has been working with them, and who had supplied the erroneous dating.

All very suspicious. Especially as we know that the Green Collection has not been entirely scrupulous with regard to acquisitions.

Edited by PaulK, : Corrected position of quote mark in title

Edited by PaulK, : Added some background at Percy’s request


Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 09-01-2019 8:37 AM PaulK has responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12626
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 2 of 4 (862123)
09-01-2019 8:37 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by PaulK
09-01-2019 6:42 AM


Could you add a paragraph about what the "1st Century Mark" affair is?

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by PaulK, posted 09-01-2019 6:42 AM PaulK has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by PaulK, posted 09-01-2019 9:29 AM Admin has not yet responded

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 15395
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 3 of 4 (862125)
09-01-2019 9:29 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Admin
09-01-2019 8:37 AM


Added a couple of paras.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 09-01-2019 8:37 AM Admin has not yet responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12626
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 4 of 4 (862134)
09-01-2019 4:15 PM


Thread Copied to Bible Study Forum
Thread copied to the More on the “1st Century Mark” affair thread in the Bible Study forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019