Summations Only

Actually as I have said before the Amnesty international makes no mention of race, culture or immigration status. None whatsoever.You accuse me of poisoning the well and say I am making a racial thing out of it? Show me where I have done that. This is another strawman of yours.
Please show where the amnesty international report backs up your wild ass assertions. The Amnesty international report you presented as evidence sys no such thing. In fact it states that this is a long time problem in the Scandinavian countries with no reference at all to recent immigrants. Another strawman. Bringing up culture is not defense against racism. All cultures except the western European culture are brown and black. You try to sound all high and mighty by saying culture but you are reciting racist tropes because you lump all MENA immigrants into the same category and have yet to provide any evidence that they are the cause of a new rape problem in Sweden. All I want is evidence and facts. Tired of assertions.

I tell you what I address some of your strawman arguments. As they are not much better than your original claim about immigrants being responsible for a "rape wave" in Sweden. Your source does not support you. You should read the full article and it's conclusions before you assume, because of it's title, that it supports you.

quote:

---

This disproves the commonly held view in Western Europe/Norway that the rise in rape cases — or the rape wave — is primarily to be blamed on the MENA immigrant’s influx to Western societies.

---

You might want to at least read the full conclusions.
Here are some important parts.

quote:

---

First, there is the obvious cultural clash between sexual norms and gender roles between the predominantly patriarchal, conservative and Muslim regions, and the predominantly gender equal, liberal and secular Western Europe. Second, there is also an overwhelming feeling of society’s discrimination and exclusion of the MENA immigrant community in Norway. This holds true for several other Western European countries as well. Even those who were born and raised in Norway to immigrant parents, testified being subject to a significant extent of discrimination in multiple layers of the society, as seen in the examples of labor market experiences, access to welfare system benefits, and so forth...
If racism and discrimination is occurring, or any other kind of maltreatment towards an ethnic minority, it will often stir social tensions. Regardless if it is happening at the workplace, at a top-down level in society such as any kind of public platform, or at a bottom-up level such as mainstream’s stereotypes and notions, it could provoke increased crime rates. This could be particularly relevant for rape crimes, as these crimes are often judged to be crimes in which the assailant seeks to exercise power or control46 — a logical reaction to humiliation. Last, but not least, the media and political public discourse’s frequent use of anti-immigrant rhetoric has also contributed greatly to shaping society’s prejudice view on MENA immigrants.

---

This Journal article is 22 years old. Do you really think it is still relevant? What does it say? What are the claims the article makes abut islamic immigrants being responsible for an increase in rapes in Sweden? That is what we are discussing. Again you build another strawman argument. How about sticking to your original claim about immigrants being responsible for a "rape wave" in Sweden.

Another strawman? No on has made such a claim. But go you.The 22 year old journal article is the other link your posted. You could tell I was talking about it because I quoted your link right above the comment you have quoted.Journal Article
Immigrants, Crime, and Criminal Justice in Sweden
Peter L. Martens
Crime and Justice
Vol. 21, Ethnicity, Crime and Immigration: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives (1997), pp. 183-255From the header. Keep up.Again I will reiterate. No article you have linked to supports your original contention that recent immigrants are responsible for a rape wave in Sweden. You are just engaging in a Gish Gallop right now. Since you can not support your original assertion then I guess I am done. I am tired of knocking down strawman after strawman.

More evidence that Sinclair Broadcasting is a propaganda arm of the right wing. Sinclair gives Trump official 'must-run' airtime to mislead on Trump immigration policy

quote:

---

Sinclair Broadcast Group kept up its quest to be Fox News, Only More So this week with an interview giving U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services acting director Ken Cuccinelli the chance to explain how wonderful and humane Trump administration immigration policy is. The interview, in one of Sinclair’s loathed must-run segments featuring former Trump staffer and Sinclair messaging thug Boris Epshteyn, is framed by Epshteyn as a response to the recent ICE raids in Mississippi, though Cuccinelli says not a word about them in what aired.

---

More on this softball interview.
Sinclair teams up with immigration official Ken Cuccinelli to defend ICE raids and demonize asylum-seekers | Media Matters for AmericaEdited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

You might want to listen to or read the actual transcript.

Answer the damn question. How did you prove the birth certificate is a forgery? What are your credentials for documentary analysis? How did the birth announcement get put in the local HI paper?

On what basis did you conclude it was a forgery? What is your expertise in document analysis? Have you published your findings?
Will you give an actual answer to at least the first question?
OK we all know the answer to that.

Enough of your blithering gab. That is the birth certificate. There is not another one. You think maybe you were lied to again?
Nothing you have claimed as evidence supports you at all. It has been shown to all be lies and smoke and mirrors.

You said you determined it was a forgery. If you determined it was a forgery you must have had some reasons. What were the reasons?

So you have no reasons. Lies? There is no other birth certificate. The one posted is it. If you have no evidence it is a forgery quit claiming that you do.

If they were you could provide the data that supports you. Alas, you can not and will not.

The forgery is laughable. This is my favorite part.

quote:

---

The document is dated 17 February 1964 and a bears a legend identifying it as having been issued by the Republic of Kenya, but Kenya (a former British colony) didn’t officially adopt that name until 12 December 1964. In February 1964, it was known as the Dominion of Kenya.

---

Is This Barack Obama's Kenyan Certified Registration of Birth? | Snopes.comThe evidence shows that he is actually an alien.

The Hawaii birth certificate is similar to the formats almost all birth certificates are in now days. All the info is in databases. The clerk pushes a button and this is what spits out.
In a lot of places in the USA, there is no "long form" birth certificate available.
Ignorant people have claimed that Obama never supplied an original birth certificate. There is no such thing as an original. In WI birth certificates come with the heading "Original Certificate of Live Birth". I have 5 copies of my sons. So the document is not an original in the idea that there is one original.
Also, since my son is adopted there is probably an earlier birth certificate that has a different name for him and different parents. This whole thing was created by racist people that were and are too stupid to understand how the process even works. And too stupid to understand what the Constitution and law actually says. Even if Barack Obama was not born in a US territory he would still have been eligible to run for President.
I have never seen a legitimate argument to counter that.

quote:

---

just three years after the drafting of the Constitution, the First Congress established that children born abroad to U.S. citizens were U.S. citizens at birth, and explicitly recognized that such children were natural born Citizens. The Naturalization Act of 1790 provided that the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States . . . . The actions and understandings of the First Congress are particularly persuasive because so many of the Framers of the Constitution were also members of the First Congress. That is particularly true in this instance, as eight of the eleven members of the committee that proposed the natural born eligibility requirement to the Convention served in the First Congress and none objected to a definition of natural born Citizen that included persons born abroad to citizen parents

---

On the Meaning of Natural Born Citizen - Harvard Law ReviewIsn't it funny how Constitutional originalists don't follow that interpretation when it does not agree with their prejudices.

Lies especially lies in the political arena always matter. The sad thing is like most lies from the right, this one was very easy to disprove. The problem is a sizeable group of people prefer hate over the truth. You are one of them.The whole Q thing is the current incarnation of the need of people to suspend truth and facts in order to embrace their hate.

You have never shown this birth certificate. As I stated before a birth certificate is not a particular document. A birth certificate is produced by the technology of the time. The birth record is kept in government records. Now days it is probably not even an entry into a book. The information is kept in government databases. The birth certificate is produced on a printer on special paper the county uses. There is no such thing as an original birth certificate. I have a birth certificate that was typed out in 1981. If I requested one now it would be printed out by a computer. Both birth certificates would be considered an original. Request your birth certificate and see what you get.Are you really this dense or does your hate blind you? The inability for the rightwing haters to even attempt to understand what they are talking about is stunning. Yet no one has provided corroborating evidence for this memory. No one has been able to show this supposed foreign student was Obama. The postman admits he was not told his name. There is no evidence Ayers and Obama ever met before 1995.
Other than that thestory is still worthless