Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8936 total)
256 online now:
Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus) (1 member, 255 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: martygraham
Post Volume: Total: 861,912 Year: 16,948/19,786 Month: 1,073/2,598 Week: 319/251 Day: 47/43 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The pristine question
ssope
Junior Member
Posts: 2
From: elmwood park
Joined: 09-04-2019


Message 1 of 4 (862617)
09-08-2019 2:42 AM


If evolution is truly a mindless bio-chemical process, I'm confused on how it would produce an organism with a motivation to stay alive. How does a chemical reaction produce a molecule that prefers one future outcome over another (life or death). How do you motivate a mindless molecule to actively pursue life. Why would it care. How could it care

---> ssope


Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminPhat, posted 09-08-2019 5:46 AM ssope has responded

  
AdminPhat
Administrator
Posts: 1920
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-03-2004


Message 2 of 4 (862619)
09-08-2019 5:46 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by ssope
09-08-2019 2:42 AM


Rewording the topic starter
Hello Tyler and welcome to EvC. Is your question basically asking how life came from non-life? As the topic originator, do you plan on making a case for a Supreme Intelligence behind the design, a flat-out apologetic of God (through Jesus Christ) as Creator of all seen and unseen? Or do you want to approach this topic scientifically in the hope that some of these questions can be rationally tackled without resorting to Faith?

Feel free to edit your topic and revise the wording in the direction you want to go, so I will know which forum to put you in should you get promoted.

EvC is a place of learning and discussion. There are many educated people that post here. Then you have a few flakes like me who are unabashed believers. But we can challenge you too, should you lean towards Faith & Belief.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ssope, posted 09-08-2019 2:42 AM ssope has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by ssope, posted 09-09-2019 1:31 AM AdminPhat has not yet responded

  
ssope
Junior Member
Posts: 2
From: elmwood park
Joined: 09-04-2019


Message 3 of 4 (862640)
09-09-2019 1:31 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminPhat
09-08-2019 5:46 AM


Re: Rewording the topic starter
My question is partly probing the idea that scientific explanations bottom out at a certain point, particularly at this point. I don't know how much more I can say because I feel I worded the question in the most concise way possible. Ultimately I am making a case for intelligent design, but I am not explicitly going to express my aim to the reader, nor should the question indicate my belief,. I want the reader to question themselves while recognizing any gaps in their knowledge. To answer your question, yes, this topic is to be approached scientifically. As to where this topic belongs, I see no difference between the Biological Evolution forum, the Human Origins and Evolution, and the Intelligent Design forum.

Edited by TylerDurden, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminPhat, posted 09-08-2019 5:46 AM AdminPhat has not yet responded

  
AdminPhat
Administrator
Posts: 1920
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-03-2004


Message 4 of 4 (862644)
09-09-2019 2:28 AM


Thread Copied to Intelligent Design Forum
Thread copied to the The pristine question thread in the Intelligent Design forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019