|
Author
|
Topic: Topic Proposal Issues
|
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 78 days) Posts: 16112 Joined: 07-20-2006
(2)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Guido Arbia's thread
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 495 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-16-2017 12:17 AM | | Dr Adequate has not yet responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 497 by Rrhain, posted 10-16-2017 3:10 AM | | Dr Adequate has not yet responded | | | Message 498 by RAZD, posted 10-16-2017 8:11 AM | | Dr Adequate has not yet responded |
|
Rrhain
Member (Idle past 899 days) Posts: 6349 From: San Diego, CA, USA Joined: 05-03-2003
|
Re: Guido Arbia's thread
Dr Adequate writes: quote:
This looks like it would be fun.
Why? It starts with a fundamental misunderstanding of what the Big Bang is, how it is said to have happened, and what it means. Because of that, we will be spending all of our time correcting that base error, which will necessarily be rejected, and nothing will come of it. We'll spend hundreds of posts going nowhere.
Rrhain
Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.
Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 496 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-16-2017 12:19 AM | | Dr Adequate has not yet responded |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 432 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Guido Arbia's thread - put it in Is It Science?
| This looks like it would be fun. |
I agree, and The Sudden Dawn of the Cosmos and the Constancy of Physical Laws would be a golden opportunity to educate people on the physics. Hopefully Guido Arbia would participate in the thread to keep it going. I'd put it in Is It Science? Enjoy
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 496 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-16-2017 12:19 AM | | Dr Adequate has not yet responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 499 by nwr, posted 10-16-2017 11:39 AM | | RAZD has responded |
|
nwr
Member Posts: 5810 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: 08-08-2005 Member Rating: 5.0
|
|
Message 499 of 507 (821956)
10-16-2017 11:39 AM
|
Reply to: Message 498 by RAZD
10-16-2017 8:11 AM
|
|
Re: Guido Arbia's thread - put it in Is It Science?
To me, it looks like a topic in creationism, might be more appropriate in Theological Creationism and ID.
Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 498 by RAZD, posted 10-16-2017 8:11 AM | | RAZD has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 500 by RAZD, posted 10-16-2017 12:23 PM | | nwr has responded |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 432 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 500 of 507 (821957)
10-16-2017 12:23 PM
|
Reply to: Message 499 by nwr
10-16-2017 11:39 AM
|
|
Re: Guido Arbia's thread - put it in Is It Science?
But the central question is whether physics laws are constant. That would require scientific evidence to challenge them, not ad hoc wishy-washy theology fantasy responses. Personally I lose interest on anything on the faith side of the forum. Enjoy
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 499 by nwr, posted 10-16-2017 11:39 AM | | nwr has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 501 by RAZD, posted 10-16-2017 12:38 PM | | RAZD has acknowledged this reply | | | Message 502 by nwr, posted 10-17-2017 12:03 AM | | RAZD has acknowledged this reply |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 432 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 501 of 507 (821958)
10-16-2017 12:38 PM
|
Reply to: Message 500 by RAZD
10-16-2017 12:23 PM
|
|
Re: Guido Arbia's thread - put it in Is It Science?
| Guido Arbia writes: Message 3: Re: Science or Theology ?
Hey. I wish there was a category that could cover both. But I guess the topic should go wherever is most appropriate. |
Sounds to me like Is It Science? quote:
Is Creationism science? Is evolution? What is the nature of science, and is either one really science?
Enjoy Edited by RAZD, : .
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 500 by RAZD, posted 10-16-2017 12:23 PM | | RAZD has acknowledged this reply |
|
nwr
Member Posts: 5810 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: 08-08-2005 Member Rating: 5.0
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 502 of 507 (821984)
10-17-2017 12:03 AM
|
Reply to: Message 500 by RAZD
10-16-2017 12:23 PM
|
|
Re: Guido Arbia's thread - put it in Is It Science?
| But the central question is whether physics laws are constant. |
We know that they are not constant. . Newtons laws were different from those of Aristotle. Einstein had yet another set of laws. And now we have QM. | That would require scientific evidence to challenge them, not ad hoc wishy-washy theology fantasy responses. |
I see it as more a philosophical question. | Personally I lose interest on anything on the faith side of the forum. |
As do I. And I have already lost interest in Guido Arbia's new topic.
Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 500 by RAZD, posted 10-16-2017 12:23 PM | | RAZD has acknowledged this reply |
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 432 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 503 of 507 (857984)
07-14-2019 11:45 AM
|
|
|
Zygosity
re: Zygosity for FaithSorry, I didn't see the edit note "Took the "for Faith" out of the topic title. I think that shooting topics at an individual member is bad form (OSLT)." I looked for explanation in the replies, didn't see one and assumed it was a copy error, I only saw the promotion note from Phat (Message 5): "Thread copied here from the Zygosity for Faith thread in the Proposed New Topics forum." So I'll go with plain vanilla Zygosity. Thnks
|
RAZD
Member (Idle past 432 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: 03-14-2004
|
|
|
Message 504 of 507 (861551)
08-23-2019 10:02 AM
|
|
|
Another IDology challenge -- complete with complaints of harsh treatments ...
|
AZPaul3
Member Posts: 6034 From: Phoenix Joined: 11-06-2006 Member Rating: 3.7
|
|
|
Message 505 of 507 (862739)
09-11-2019 11:30 PM
|
|
|
SPAM Message 1 and Message 1
Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.
|
Adminnemooseus
Director Posts: 3938 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 506 of 507 (862745)
09-12-2019 12:22 AM
|
Reply to: Message 505 by AZPaul3
09-11-2019 11:30 PM
|
|
Every once in a while I like to let a spammer have a chance, just for the ambience
The party in question looked pretty dubious, but I couldn't really pin any spammer history on him. His (2) spam messages have been banished to a viewable by admins only place. About 95% of this forums registration attempts are by people I can document as being spammers, and they get permanently suspended without ever getting their registration approved. Probably about half of those that I do approve, never complete the registration process, and just disappear from the record. See https://www.evcforum.net/MemberList.php?control=dtreg to get an idea of the number of spammers I reject. Note all the little red dots in the far right column. Adminnemooseus
Or something like that©.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 505 by AZPaul3, posted 09-11-2019 11:30 PM | | AZPaul3 has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 507 by AZPaul3, posted 09-12-2019 12:36 AM | | Adminnemooseus has acknowledged this reply |
|
AZPaul3
Member Posts: 6034 From: Phoenix Joined: 11-06-2006 Member Rating: 3.7
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Every once in a while I like to let a spammer have a chance, just for the ambience
This place is remarkably clean of crap spam for an internet address. You do a good job. I can imagine it would be easy to fake a registration then revert to scheme. No intended slap at you and your efforts you great big beautiful Moose.
Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 506 by Adminnemooseus, posted 09-12-2019 12:22 AM | | Adminnemooseus has acknowledged this reply |
|
™ Version 4.0 Beta
