Time Dilation, the Hubble Shift and God's Eternal Universe

I don't intend to begin a new debate here, but I just want to note that 2 days ago the Journal of Cosmology began its first new volume in 3 years based on my model.Vol #27: "Time Dilation Cosmology in the Evolving Spacetime/Quantum Continuum: General Relativity & the Hubble Shift".

d

quote:

---

It is still not a real scientific journal. It is an online vanity press.

---

This explains why, after 14 months of peer review, they have not only published a paper by, but made it the center piece of, the first new volume they have begun in 3 years, by a newcomer?The journal was begun in the tradition of John Maddox of Nature magazine. It is peer reviewed in the respect that other scientists believe it has enough merit to be considered in a public forum. Especially since current "theories" are pretty much nonsensical.Now, my friend, be careful what you say next...... I will discuss it, but I will not allow libel to go unanswered. I am the "fight a duel over honor" type... a Fed academy grad... where we had an honor code....and I have the resources to pursue legal action...

quote:

---

when MIT, Perimeter or Stanford invites you to guest lecture on your model

---

A Harvard/Smithsonian astrophysicist just made my model the basis of a new volume in his journal, that hasn't published a new volume in 3 years.....Schild also told me he is also going to ref my intro to the new journal and my model in two papers he is currently working on.I find it sad that my simple "heads up" about the great news for me, where a paper in a volume of a journal that might get 30 views a month is now the latest volume (after 3 years) on the home page of the journal that gets 60K/mo views.....Which, of course, also proves my point about.....what my origins section says.... If you jokers can't see what is happening in MY life, and has been for soooooo loooong.... and can't understand the words coming out of my mouth, I am sorry. I really am. I am working to end that pain of hopelessness you feel.You are not alone. I have posted in three forums. The folks in ScienceForums hate me, like, sadly, you do, (even though I lost my mom ) (They, sadly, don't know about my mom. ) but I actually got help there as I worked things out..... Credit due...In the respectable NakedScientists forum moderated by Cambridge University, no one has challenged me at all for, I guess, over a year, in the two threads that have remained hot topics for all that time and in the one thread had over 12K views since I had the last word and the other, that I began, over 7K.....I'll settle gladly for 1 in 3, especially when that one is sponsored by, and moderated by, Cambridge.Sadly you folk just want to diminish anything, or any one, you don't understand outside your BB "THEORIES".You both could have just let my update be simply that, but you are in spiritual pain, feel lost, and where you want to attack and diminish your fellows if they have a different "point of view". You are insecure, and it shows, my friends. So, hush, now.As, really, all we are is "different points of view", see the dilemma here? The cause of inquisitions and war and genocide?You don't debate anything here, like at least they do in ScienceForums, and those folk really know their stuff, and got really nasty like you folk, over the course of a heated 11 day debate that left me unbloodied. All of this, even though you know I lost my mom , albeit, as it turns out, in '95.And, sadly, your minds are closed, and have been for a loooooonnnnggg time to OTHER theories and models even though YOUR THEORY doesn't work without "placeholder": "I don't knows".Sooo, once again, if anyone has legit things to discuss without the vile bile of the injured, hateful, violent souls....in the words of Frazier, "I'm listening".I would be happy to discuss the spiritual implications of my model in another thread..

I didn't say you libeled me, I just cautioned you.The original owners of the journal did pursue "life in space" issues, exploring possibilities. Ownership changed after Vol. 14.CBS: Jun 28, 2019 - "New research being presented at the Astrobiology Science Conference shows the International Space Station has an irritating mould problem not only on the inside, but the outside, too. The spores which astronauts spend hours cleaning every week can survive X-ray exposure...... "As I noted in a previous post, I do not see life coming from space. Life spreads from within: We are all of us more of us coming forth from within us. If the right building blocks (H2O and C) are present in the right conditions, life begins building structures.I would also note that life grows matter "up" against the direction of gravity and what I see as a forward direction of time.I don't know who reviewed the paper. there were at least 4 and of the 4 they were split 2 for and 2 against...Others may have been consulted, but I don't know any other details.....

Typical non-responsive personal attack....Ho Hum

I cautioned you because you are over the edge with anger and are prone to wild name calling and accusations and violent outbursts like this. Sad, really.

New submissions go into existing relevant volumes. Sorry if you don't care for the subjects they cover, but as I noted earlier, these things need discussion and airing.For instance, even though the government has declassified and shown UAP (UFO) objects flying alongside our fighters, that topic can not be discussed in any journal. Not even the JofC.Some of the scientists published in the JofC are doing coordinated research on how they communicate and how they are making quantum leaps to get here and maneuver like they do. But not a single one of them will even try to put anything in any journal on that subject.Yet we, the people of planet Earth, should be openly doing this.... It is idiotic to just stare at them and say, "duh".In the Editors' opinion my model warranted a new volume, even though they initially had it in the MECO volume as it uses MECOs.Edited by Captcass, : No reason given.

Sorry for the assumption. My bad.As far as I can tell, most of the scientists are also published in the mainstream journals on other subjects. The journal covers many of the non-mainstream topics they cannot get into the other journals but want to discuss.But, no UAP's!

quote:

---

there is only supposed photos and video of

---

governmetn declassifies ufo phots by piolots - Google Search

quote:

---

all you have is supposition and wild ass guesses

---

Not true. As we know what they are not doing, technologically, it narrows down what they are doing. A lot of work has been and is being put into this by serious, published, scientists. An example is:https://www.amazon.com/...ousness-Intelligence/dp/1721088652

I would say they simply don't get that number of submissions on the topics they cover...

quote:

---

I am not impressed with self published scientific books

---

OK. You are entitled to your opinion. My point was that a lot of serious scientists are looking at these things. I have no problem with them publishing their own papers in books or anywhere else.

quote:

---

there has been no evidence that they are some sort of alien craft

---

I had a long, 2 hour, experience with one about 300' in diameter that came within 1/4 mile when I was 16. It maneuvered in physically impossible fashions. It made Newsday the next day as so many people in Patchogue, a town to the east of where I was, saw it.No one on this planet could possible keep such technology a secret. Too many people would be involved.

No. There is a lot they do not cover.In cosmology, the mainstream journals will not publish anything that contradicts BB and expanding universe theories. They serve those theories like they are already proven, just as many here take them as gospel truth.It is also very difficult to get into the mainstream journals, hence the advent of vixra.org, a simple repository for new papers on all kinds of subjects..... This is a great, healthy environment that encourages the development of new ideas....

No, Faith, not about UFOs, I was just using them as an example. I don't mean to get into all of that.

quote:

---

take them as gospel truth.

---

lol. I forgot the real biggie that no journal in any discipline will publish any paper that even mentions a creator or any spiritual reference. Even the JofC had me edit out the "faith" and other such terms from my paper you will find in my vixra version, even though they have 2 volumes on Astro-Theology.

quote:

---

Do you have evidence of this Newsday article

---

I had Newsday send me a copy of it years ago. How do you paste a jpg in here?

quote:

---

BTW, how much did they charge you to publish the paper in the journal?

---

Only the reviewer's fee."Article Processing Fee: The Journal of Cosmology is a Peer Reviewed Open Access journal and requires the payment of a $35.00 Article Processing Fee to cover costs for processing and managing the peer review process. Manuscripts will not be processed until all Processing Fees have been paid.All articles are peer reviewed. This $35.00 fee is not refundable if the article is rejected.Article Publication Fee: If the article is accepted, there is a $150.00 Publication Charge, that will be billed to and must be paid by the submitting author following the acceptance of the article for publication.Accepted articles will not be published until the publication fee is received."I was not charged the publication fee. Schild told me they used to have a per page fee, but dropped that so people from poorer nations could afford it, and they wave those fees completely if the individual cannot afford them.I hope you see one. If you then tell me they are not "alien".....By the way, no one has specified WHERE they come from..... "outer" space, adjacent dimension...??? But they most certainly are "alien". Edited by Captcass, : No reason given.

quote:

---

and make no contact whatsoever

---

You had visual contact, others claim physical contact.What I saw was "alien"...from where? I don't know. I have had 2 other observations, one of which i caught on film. Please note we get very little samll plane/helo activity here. It is the jump off point for the GC routes to Asia, so we get a lot of high altitude traffic.
http://captcass.com/UFO.htmAnd why would they want to make contact with such a violent race? My understanding is that the first contact will involve an autopsy because the governmental consensus is we have to know how to kill them....Edited by Captcass, : No reason given.Edited by Captcass, : No reason given.