Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 88 (8947 total)
35 online now:
AZPaul3, Coragyps, DrJones*, Percy (Admin), Theodoric, xongsmith (6 members, 29 visitors)
Newest Member: ski zawaski
Post Volume: Total: 866,004 Year: 21,040/19,786 Month: 1,437/2,023 Week: 388/557 Day: 81/47 Hour: 1/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Testing The Christian Apologists
Thugpreacha
Member
Posts: 13258
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 1 of 2 (864975)
10-19-2019 4:35 PM


I wanted to attempt and bring this specific topic here. ringo has challenged me to discuss the apologists whom I listen to and defend (or expose) them appropriately. I will say from the outset that the argument has already been done informally through us here on the forum. It boils down to faith vs evidence, which in my mind is inconclusive because I won't allow evidence to be the only default standard used when discussing concepts that have no way of being objectively proven initially to begin with.

The first Christian Apologist that I want to present is Frank Turek.

quote:
Turek was a Naval Flight Officer in the U.S. Navy, and has a master's degree in Public Administration from George Washington University and a Doctor of Ministry in Apologetics from Southern Evangelical Seminary. He has also taught classes in Leadership and Management at George Washington University.
I was listening to the following podcast this morning:
What Makes Something Right Or Wrong? In it, Dr.Turek brought up one of our old arguments which we have discussed to death here at EvC, namely that God can have foreknowledge without sacrificing human free will. It is at about the 25-30 minute mark. Dr.Turek has a passionate argument. Listen to the 5 minutes and see if anyone can spot dishonesty or logical errors...I am sure they are there. (I don't see him as dishonest, but my critics might)

I dont have time to write it all out at the moment, but it can be rediscussed here. We have done it before, and I feel that there was no conclusion. Free Will vs Ultimate Foreknowledge

I may find a transcript later.

Edited by Thugpreacha, : No reason given.


Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. ~RC Sproul
"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain "
~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith

You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo

“As the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, so the denial of God is the height of foolishness.”
? R.C. Sproul, Essential Truths of the Christian Faith


Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3908
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 2 (865001)
10-19-2019 9:39 PM


Thread Copied to Faith and Belief Forum
Thread copied to the Testing The Christian Apologists thread in the Faith and Belief forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019