The Right Side of the News

quote:

---

Article Two, Section 1, Clause 7: Salary:
The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.

---

1. Impeachable offenses.
   
   Most of these are collectively referred to as "high crimes and misdemeanors" (follow the link for more information). This is an old English legal term which basically describes a public official not performing his duties and betraying the public trust that he had been given such that he should be removed from office (impeachment -- our system makes removal a second step of the process). As that link lists possible high crimes and misdemeanors:

   quote:

   ---

   The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct by officials, such as dishonesty, negligence, perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of public funds or assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, refusal to obey a lawful order, chronic intoxication, or tax evasion. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, but perhaps with different standards of proof and punishment than for non-officials, on the grounds that more is expected of officials by their oaths of office. Indeed the offense may not even be a breach of criminal statute. See Harvard Law Review "The majority view is that a president can legally be impeached for 'intentional, evil deeds' that 'drastically subvert the Constitution and involve an unforgivable abuse of the presidency' even if those deeds didn’t violate any criminal laws."

   ---

   In addition to that, Article Two Section 4:Impeachment says:

   quote:

   ---

   The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

   ---

   ​

   Obviously, the emoluments clauses would go under high crimes and misdemeanors:
   Article Two, Section 1, Clause 7:Salary
   

   quote:

   ---

   The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.

   ---

   Meaning that the president's salary is set at a constant and the president may not receive other compensation from either the federal or any state government.
   And Article One, Section 9, Clause 8:Titles of nobility
   

   quote:

   ---

   No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

   ---

   ​

   Obviously, Trump's profiting off of his golf trips would be covered under the domestic emoluments clause. Trump receiving profits from foreign dignitaries staying in his hotels could be considered foreign emoluments, especially when a foreign power reserves large blocks of rooms for extended periods of time, though that might also be covered under bribery.

   ​

   Part of the point is that trying to quibble over whether an action violates any particular law is completely moot here. Of course, violation of an actual law is an added plus, but is not required.

   ​

   Note also that an impeachment is not a judicial proceeding, but rather a political remedy to a political problem of an official violating his duties and oath of office. The only result of an impeachment and conviction is removal from office and that stain on that official's record. No imprisonment nor fines nor any such consequences. Though in the President's case, his removal will also remove that artificial OLC memo's protection against indictments, leaving him open to further prosecution in actual judicial proceedings, which is what Trump is so desperately trying to prevent (basically, his primary reason to attain reelection, saving his own rancid skin).

   ​

   On a side note, collusion with Russia may have no legal definition as a crime (the given reason for Mueller to never even consider it), but it is still very much an impeachable offense. And the Mueller Report shows massive collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign (in which, like in every other Trump operation, nothing happens without Trump's approval or knowledge).
   ​
2. Violations of the law.
   These are very serious indeed. But we have in place on the federal level those ill-advised OLC memos that a sitting president could not be indicted for a crime. Granted, they were written in a nave environment when we assumed that the president would act in a civilized manner and comport to the Rule of Law. Unfortunately, they never anticipated such a lawless executive as Donald Trump and thus were unprepared for the rampant lawlessness of his administration.

   ​

   Now, once a sitting president has been removed from office, he will still be liable to facing indictments for whatever laws he had violated.

   ​

   Now, these are the crimes for which an ex-president can be duly indicted, prosecuted, convicted, and punished for.
   ​
3. Crimes against humanity.
   
   Concentration camps on our borders. Children of all ages separated from their families with absolutely no plan in place for bringing them back together. Abysmal conditions in those concentration camps while prisons-for-profit companies make a killing -- at over $700 a day, what does it really cost for the most basic personal care?

   ​

   Becoming party to the ethnic cleansing against our ally, the Kurds.

   ​

   These crimes against humanity will need to wind their way into the international courts. Nothing may ever come of it, but it very richly should!