Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 88 (8947 total)
39 online now:
Newest Member: ski zawaski
Post Volume: Total: 865,995 Year: 21,031/19,786 Month: 1,428/2,023 Week: 379/557 Day: 72/47 Hour: 5/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Believe in UFOs? This editorial's for you!
Faith
Member
Posts: 33739
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001
Member Rating: 1.2


Message 136 of 139 (865976)
11-03-2019 2:30 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by ringo
11-03-2019 2:24 PM


Re: Optical illusions and optical delusions
Vallee did because he doesn't believe in tne supernatural you snarky mizzerable slimebucket. Yeah suspend me whoever.

{Percy is becoming the Mad Censor for sure. "Mis(z)erable"?}

_


This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by ringo, posted 11-03-2019 2:24 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by ringo, posted 11-03-2019 2:38 PM Faith has responded

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 17580
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 137 of 139 (865977)
11-03-2019 2:38 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by Faith
11-03-2019 2:30 PM


Re: Optical illusions and optical delusions
Faith writes:

Vallee did because he doesn't believe in tne supernatural....


You said in Message 132, "...Jacques Vallee who rightly concluded that they simply do not obey physical laws...."

That's supernatural.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Faith, posted 11-03-2019 2:30 PM Faith has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 11-03-2019 2:59 PM ringo has responded

  
Faith
Member
Posts: 33739
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001
Member Rating: 1.2


Message 138 of 139 (865979)
11-03-2019 2:59 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by ringo
11-03-2019 2:38 PM


Re: Optical illusions and optical delusions
OH LET ME BE MORE ACCURATE THEN MR. SNARK. HE DIDN'T BEFORE HE DID HIS STUDY. HE DISCOVERED THAT WAS THE ONLY REASONABLE EXPLANATION. I DON'T KNOW IF HE USED THAT TERM EITHER, "SUPERNATURAL," BUT HE WAS REFERRING TO THE "BEINGS" DESCRIBED IN "FOLKLORE."

Edited by Faith, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by ringo, posted 11-03-2019 2:38 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by ringo, posted 11-03-2019 3:25 PM Faith has not yet responded

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 17580
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 139 of 139 (865986)
11-03-2019 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 138 by Faith
11-03-2019 2:59 PM


Re: Optical illusions and optical delusions
Faith writes:

HE DISCOVERED THAT WAS THE ONLY REASONABLE EXPLANATION.


It isn't a "reasonable" explanation. It's an excuse to stop looking for an explanation.

Faith writes:

I DON'T KNOW IF HE USED THAT TERM EITHER, "SUPERNATURAL," BUT HE WAS REFERRING TO THE "BEINGS" DESCRIBED IN "FOLKLORE."


It doesn't matter what term he used. It's clear he was taking the easy way out with folklore/superstition.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 11-03-2019 2:59 PM Faith has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019