The Right Side of the News

No, he hates America and conveyed it in his disgusting apologies to other nations. He should go run for office in Saudi Arabia.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

That's a bunch of wishful crap. Some of it is no more than hearsay, some of it is just "he said" such and such, and some of it may be factually true although with a liberal spin on it, but isn't a crime or other kind of offense. He's done nothing impeachable and I hope that gets established soon. Some Democrats, however, are guilty of TRULY criminal and/or impeachable offenses, and I hope THAT gets established soon.May all the truth come out.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

No, the maker of the list shows no reason to take any of it as impeachable, it's the usual lying innuendo, so I don't owe any support for my rejection of it.

Look, if any of that crap was impeachable the House Democrats wouldn't still be trying to find something impeachable. If the Mueller Report had found anything impeachable they wouldn't have needed to set up this whole "whistleblower" hoax -- a spy in the White House, working for the Democrats, formerly involved with Biden, who didn't even personally hear the phone call he supposedly blew the whistle on. These people all need to be rebuked and upbraided and kicked out of office. They've never found anything; all of it is a fishing expedition TRYING to find something, the most disgusting partisan hoax/fraud ever perpetrated on the American people. They have NOTHING, it's all innuendo, it's all smoke and mirrors, all wishful thinking. Charge him with something or shut up.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Ha ha, every day they have to change something or other to pretend they have something, which only proves the big nothing they have. Couple of weeks ago the "whistleblower" who was just a Democrat plant, was the big evidence to replace the earlier nonevidence, and now we've got some new nonevidence to replace the bogus whistleblower. Ha na and ho hum.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Perhaps he's talking about the big cities run by the Radical Left Dems where there are huge tent cities occupied by the homeless, mostly drug addicts who throw their drug needles everywhere to be a hazard, and defecate on the sidewalks, causing a health hazard for everybody, where old diseases are now proliferating again and the city does nothing to help them. I know of three such cities for sure: Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle, but there are at least half a dozen, maybe more in the rest of the country. I don't know if New York is one of them.

OK you celebrate her spirit, so if a bunch of us conservatives went and flipped off the liberal members of Congress as they come and go you'd celebrate our spirit too.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Clinton for sure who scrubbed her illegal server to cover up classified emails. Some who helped her acquire the totally false "dossier" supplied by the Brit Steele to try to discredit Trump during his campaign; any of those who acquired FISA warrants on the basis of that illegal dossier, not remembering names, Comey I think for exonerating Clinton of her crime. Clapper and Brennan are memtioned as criminally at fault. , Adam Schiff for making up the content of the President's phone call; probably the "whistleblower" who is really a spy in the White House probably acting for Schiff, having once worked for Biden, who did not hear the phone call he supposedly blew the whistle on. There are more but I'm not good at remembering these things.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This kind of homelessness is a new thing, there has never been such a danger to the society before the last few years. We're talking thousands upon thousands in these tent cities. We're talking police catching diseases from them as they try to deal with the problems among them. I remember when the mentally ill were released onto the streets of California because of liberal policies, where they threatened people and created a nuisance. It is still mostly the mentally ill on the streets, and they still threaten people who are just going about their business. There was a homelessness problem back in the days of the Depression I understand, the hobo population, but between then and the situation I describe above what problem existed? Certainly nothing like we are hearing about today which is a serious threat to the wellbeing of everybody including the homeless themselves. Where are the programs a liberal government should be providing?Of course your explanation focuses on conservatives but most of the homeless can't even hold a job due either to drug addiction or mental illness or both, so it's got nothing to do with income levels.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

True you can't impeach someone who is not in office, so she should go to prison instead.

But of course they would.

You've got a list of what, over fifty? allegations. Sorry, but there would have been a charge by now going into impeachment and there is NONE, nothing, nada, zip. Mueller's investigation was the same function as Starr's and Starr came up with eleven CLEAR FELONIES that Clinton could be impeached for, Mueller came up with NONE. They are still fishing and fishing and fishing. Nowe we've got this absurd "whistleblower" stuff BECAUSE Mueller didn't come up with anything. Coming up with nothing should have ended impeachment but it didn't because they have been determined to impeach Trump from the beginning and that's why they've been fishing, they've never had anything to charge him with. There shouldn't even have been a Mueller investigation because there was no legal reason to have it, there was no crime to investigate. This whole thing is a sham, a hoax, a fraud and it is continuing although they STILL have nothing. A long list of who knows what but long long past the point where they should have had something to charge him with. It certainly is. Trump released the transcript of that phone call, no more "witnesses" are needed, you can read the damn thing for yourself, there is nothing in it that they are alleging is in it. The "whistleblower" was a spy in the White House, a Trump hater, put up to it by Schiff, the master Trump hater, didn't hear the phone call himself so how can he blow any whistles anyway? The man worked for Biden. And you guys go on rationalizing all this stuff away though it is so far out of bounds everybody involved ought to be tarred and feathered and hounded through the streets of Washington.

NON OF THEM FOR INTERFERENCE IN THE ELECTION, AND THE ONLY INTERFERENCE IN THE ELECTION WAS BY CLINTON AGAINST TRUMP.THE MUELLER REPORT CONCLUDED THAT THERE WAS NO "RUSSIAN COLLUSION" OR HOWEVER THEY PUT THAT, BY TRUMP OR ANY OF HIS CAMPAIGN WORKERS IN THE ELECTION.

YES RUSSIANS INTERFERED BUT NOT ON TRUMP'S SIDE AND AGAIN TRUMP AND HIS WORKERS WERE CLEARED OF ANY "COLLUSZION.".

Everything I've been hearing is that Sondland DID NOT believe there was a quid pro quo, that has been misunderstood. And yes I know he changed his mind. So what? Why does his opinion or anybody's opinion matter? It's all opinion, meaningless.You are the one who has everything wrong according to my sources. Trump is right to withhold aid from a nation when there is any suspicion of corruption, and there was nothing wrong with asking for help with the investigation into the 2016 election. And there's so much confusxion about the Biden comment it's hard to be sure what it's all about but nevertheless my sources understand Trrump committed no impropriety there either.AND WHY WOULD HE RELEASE THE TRANSCRIPT, SO SURE IT SHOWED NO OFFENSES WHATEVER, IF IT DID?