Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 59 (9025 total)
44 online now:
kjsimons, PaulK (2 members, 42 visitors)
Newest Member: JustTheFacts
Post Volume: Total: 883,364 Year: 1,010/14,102 Month: 2/411 Week: 23/168 Day: 2/21 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Faith vs Facts Opinion Piece
Suspended Member (Idle past 231 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001

Message 4 of 5 (866362)
11-10-2019 11:38 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by AdminPhat
11-10-2019 10:06 AM

You do not say, “I believe that my dog is alive.” The fact is so obvious it is not worth stating. You simply talk in ways that presume the dog’s aliveness — you say she’s adorable or hungry or in need of a walk. But to say, “I believe that Jesus Christ is alive” signals that you know that other people might not think so. It also asserts reverence and piety. We seem to regard religious beliefs and factual beliefs with what the philosopher Neil Van Leeuwen calls different “cognitive attitudes.”

There's something logically wrong here. There are no "different cognitive attitudes" involved, there are two entirely different things being discussed that have to be described differently. Same cognitive attitude, just the usual necessary distinctions between different things. The dog is alive in the usual familiar sense that physical beings are alive, but Jesus Christ is alive in the ******* sense that He is alive after having died and **** this physical world. His alieveness has to be identified in ******* terms because it is a different state of being from the aliveness of the dog and all the other beings who are alive in this physical world.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by AdminPhat, posted 11-10-2019 10:06 AM AdminPhat has acknowledged this reply

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021