The Right Side of the News

the crime was russian interference in the 2016 election, multiple people connected to said interference have been indicted. the articles of impeachment come after the investigation which is still underway. first hand knowledge is not a requirement for whistleblowing. what evidence do you have for this accusation? contrary to trump's claims the "transcript" isn't a perfect reproduction of the call, it says right on it that it is based on multiple people's notes and recollections of the call. Witnesses are needed to fill in the gaps and provide information.edit: here is the link to the "transcript": https://www.whitehouse.gov/...019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdfas you can see right one the first page it states it is not a verbatim record of the conversation.Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.

lie, multiple russians have been indicted for interference. they couldn't establish collusion, but that isn't the same as Russian interference. The trump campaign might have been cleared, there was still multiple Russians indicted for interference. Seriously Faith just read the report.

right so by identifying and indicting said Russians the Mueller investigation carried out it's primary purpose. Thus invalidating your claim that there was no reason for the Mueller investigation, thank you for agreeing with my position that you're full of shit.edit: also the report concluded that the russian efforts were to help trump's campaign.Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.

cause he's not a very smart person.

Trump ordered to pay $2M in Trump Foundation settlement, admits misuse of funds | Fox News misusing charitable funds is illegal. that was from the AG of New York Faith, the person who brought the case against the trump foundation. it's not an unsupported claim, there was an actual trial that Trump just agreed to settle.

Lie. The purpose of the Mueller investigation was to look into Russian interference in the 2016 election and any other crimes they came across in their investigation. Multiple russians have been indicted for interference in the election.

this isn't a trial yet Faith, you really should get your memory checked you've been told this multiple times. Trump can come testify before the committee anytime he pleases. any evidence for this assertion? it was on hold until people started asking about it. lie

he'll have his chance at the actual trial, in the senate. so some guy says he knows who the whistblower is but doesn't name him, how does this prove that the whistleblower worked for Biden? Lie.Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.

and what is your evidence that he is the whistleblower?

first hand knowledge is not required to be a whistleblower.

and was only released after the whistleblower report was made public. right "you do A and then I give you B" is textbook quid pro quo. Quid pro quo = something for something (translated from the Latin).Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.

because the whistleblower exposed their scheme, the aid was released only after the whistleblower's report was made public and people started asking why the aid was being held up of course there was "I get A, you get B" is the literal definition of quid pro quo.

there is also the lie that Crowdstrike is a Ukrainian company owned by a Ukrainian, it's Americian company owned by an American.

Crowdstrike isn't associated with the Steele Dossier, that was Fusion GPS. The people who've bought into the russian misinformation campaign allege that Crowdstrike is behind the "disappearance" of the DNC server.

not possible, Javelins are man portable anti-tank weapons they have a max range of 3 miles.