Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
111 online now:
kjsimons, Percy (Admin), vimesey (3 members, 108 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 893,979 Year: 5,091/6,534 Month: 511/794 Week: 2/135 Day: 2/19 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Mueller Report On-Line and Downloadable
JonF
Member
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 12 of 43 (867756)
12-02-2019 5:55 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Faith
12-02-2019 5:00 PM


Re: the conclusion
Insufficient evidence to charge is not exoneration. Not allowed to charge slam-dunk cases because of administrative policy is not exoneration.

I note you cannot address the substance of the replies, just vomiting up the same bushwah. Oh, well, that's what we expect from Trumpistas.

Edited by JonF, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Faith, posted 12-02-2019 5:00 PM Faith has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Admin, posted 12-02-2019 8:30 PM JonF has taken no action

  
JonF
Member
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 13 of 43 (867757)
12-02-2019 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by PaulK
12-02-2019 5:22 PM


Re: the conclusion
House needed a really strong case to get past the Senate.

No case could be strong enough to pass Moscow Mitch and Leningrad Lindsey.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by PaulK, posted 12-02-2019 5:22 PM PaulK has taken no action

  
JonF
Member
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 17 of 43 (867762)
12-02-2019 6:48 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Faith
12-02-2019 6:21 PM


Re: the conclusion
No changes. Not indicted is no exonerated.

There's overwhelming evidence for Trump's real transgressions. No dreaming required.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Faith, posted 12-02-2019 6:21 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Faith, posted 12-02-2019 7:33 PM JonF has replied

  
JonF
Member
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


(1)
Message 30 of 43 (867789)
12-03-2019 9:23 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Faith
12-02-2019 7:33 PM


Re: the conclusion
Trump was not indicted solely because of a DOJ administrative opinion. If it were only a question of breaking the law he would have been indicted for multiple crimes.

That is, he got off on a technicality. He's guilty.

That's not exoneration in law or in public opinion.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Faith, posted 12-02-2019 7:33 PM Faith has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022