(strike the last word)
It makes the point that foreign leaders regard Trump as a joke. Your post doesn't reflect an understanding of what parody is.
I understand where parody belongs and where it does not. It's fine on SNL, on political commentary shows, on talk radio be it liberal or conservative, in everyday conversations involving just about anybody. Pelosi and others have claimed that this impeachment process, is very serious, very grave, very unfortunate. Official statements about it by a congressperson, let alone a committee chair, is where it DOES NOT BELONG. Who, in an attempted walk-back of Schiff's LIE, coined the term, "parody", for this lie? It was Schiff himself. It's amazing how many others quickly attempt to help him with damage control.
Cover for him how?
By taking off and running with his "parody" excuse.
He received a lot of criticism in the mainstream media for acting in a way inappropriate and undignified for a House Committee Chairman.
I guess that depends on what the definition of "a lot" is.
So when Trump calls Schiff a "maniac" and "a deranged human being" and "a very sick man" and a liar and that he deserves to be in jail, that's justified because of insults directed at Trump after his 2015 announcement over four years ago?
Schiff only seems to have grown horns recently. He's been a member of the House since 2001. He agreed with Bush 43 about the invasion of Iraq. I never noticed him being in the news at all until very recently. He doesn't seem to have a nasty, tyrannical ambition like...Bernie Sanders, Beto O'Rourke, Tom Steyer, many others. He really seems like he could be a nice guy. What could have caused him to turn out to be a such a partisan liar so suddenly? My common sense suspicion, that you scoff at, is that he's
after a money prize. That is what has turned him into a deranged maniac, a liar. Need some evidence that he's a liar?
Adam Schiff Reading Self Written Clown Parody LIED To Congress
Adam Schiff credibility crumbling amid Donald Trump impeachment push - Washington Times
MSNBC | Washington Examiner
Adam Schiff Lies About Vindman Testimony in Next Hearing
Adam Schiff Lied That He Doesn’t Know The Identity Of The Whistleblower – Def-Con News
Adam Schiff Caught in Another Major Lie
I only have one guy I'm tracking insults/attacks from, and that's Trump. I'm not deep searching the web for Trump attacks/insults, they're all right there in the headlines from all news media, including Fox News usually. If these attacks/insults were actually instigated by attacks/insults from Democrats then they should be very easy for you to find, so find them.
This List Of Attacks Against Conservatives Is Mind Blowing | The Daily Caller
The 7 Worst Liberal Attacks on Donald Trump's Family
Liberal attacks on Trump are so unhinged, it might get him killed
https://cowgernation.com/...ting-the-catholic-apostles-creed
quote:
When 95% of media donates to Democrats it is no surprise that 90% of the stories they run about Trump are nasty smears and character assassinations.
The Mainstream Media has become a 24/7 Attack on Trump • iPatriot Contributers •
My "'splainin'" comment was just a riff on I Love Lucy to indicate that you'd already told us all we needed to know, but thank you for the additional clarification about your homophobia.
Do you have a derogatory name for those who started this organization?
NLGJA: The Association of LGBTQ Journalists - Wikipedia
Hetrophobes? No? Double standard?
But I don't know of their existence. I know you keep claiming they exist, but you can't seem to produce any examples. Every attempt you've made has been rebutted nine ways from Sunday.
See above, get busy. Schiff has been shown to be a liar nine ways from Sunday. Need more links?
But unlike you, I can prove what I say is true. For any particular adjective you'd like to challenge I'll have no trouble finding a post from me documenting Trump displaying that exact trait. Perhaps you'd like to start with "cruel" (treatment of illegal immigrants at the border). How about "vengeful" (so many examples, I'll chose just one, tweeting insults at Yavanovich while she was testifying). Maybe you prefer "misogynistic" (can objections to this even be raised?). Then there's "racist" (Charlottesville). And "scheming" (the plot to force Ukraine to investigate a domestic political rival). Pick your adjective, they're all easily proven.
"Cruel", every single past U.S. president can be accused of being cruel at one time or another during their presidency. Was FDR cruel when he ordered Japanese Americans rounded up shortly after Pearl Harbor? It's only one example - all your adjectives come from a liberal political view. If they were simple true facts about who he is, he wouldn't be president, and wouldn't have the support he has from somewhere around half the population.
marc9000 writes:
Fox news is less biased than the mainstream media.
So even Fox News isn't an acceptable source for you? You're going to have to tell me your supposedly legitimate unbiased news sources.
How in this world do you take from my comment about Fox News' lack of bias to mean that I don't find them acceptable?
ABC World News Tonight averages about 8.6 million viewers nightly, which is about 3.4% of the adult population. It is not "the only news source for many Americans." Like I said, the reason you say so many incorrect things, nearly everything you write, is because you never take the trouble to check whether what you think has any factual basis.
Point taken, that was my mistake. ABC World News Tonight claims to be "America's most watched news source". They obviously lie.
You need serious help with logic and analysis. Trump sought to pressure Ukraine to make a public announcement of an investigation of Biden corruption to hurt Joe Biden's chances of obtaining the Democratic nomination.
Or maybe it was just an attempt to get justice for serious past U.S. government corruption. What evidence do you have to show that Trump was nervous about facing Biden in the 2020 election, well over a year before that election? Ever since all these Democrats have come forward seeking the nomination, Trump and most conservatives clearly see that none of them are much of a threat to defeat Trump in 2020. All the scrambling, the new billionaires like Bloomberg, Steyer etc recently jumping in, and other things make it obvious.
Of course you can't prove it. You're using a Trumpism, just like the one Trump used in the White House transcript of the phone call with Zelensky where he says, "They say Crowdstrike." Who's "they?" Trump does this all time. "They're saying this" and "they're saying that" when the only person saying it is Trump. This is what he does when he's making things up and can't prove what he's saying. That's why you just now had to add that you can't prove what you're saying, because saying stuff like "I've heard it somewhere" is not only not proof of anything, it's just a false way of trying to lend weight to something with no evidence.
Most posters here say things without constantly providing links to back them up. And often when they do, they only link to remarks from others who are opinionated just like they are. Check out the links in
Message 3594 They're pretty useless, as are most claims of "proof" that are linked on message boards. I lend weight to things that I see in my life's experiences. A reader can accept them, or dismiss them. It's the way I choose to do it, you can censure me or ban me if you feel the need.
If moving forward on impeachment is only going to hurt them, then you should be delighted that the Democrats are doing this. It's not just you saying this, many Republicans and many voices in the conservative media are claiming that impeachment just hurts the Democrats. In that case you should all be urging the Democrats on in their self destructive ways.
But you're not,
How do you know I'm not? I've had the hearings on in the background today off and on, and I'm enjoying it.
because at least inside you understand that the Democrats' actions hurt Trump. They hurt themselves, too, because a significant proportion of the electorate believes Trump did nothing wrong.
Compared to Obama, he hasn't.
realclearpolitics.com
Review & Outlook: Obama's Abuse of Power - WSJ
quote:
The Obama administration was full of scandal, though we have a lazy and partisan news media that is determined to see no scandal in it.
Obama’s Many Scandals: Abuse of Government Power Worse Than Sex Scandals | National Review
Now, let's see how quickly you dismiss the links I've provided in this message, and maybe you'll see why I limit my time and effort in doing it.
I yield back.....
™ Version 4.2
(1)