|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,482 Year: 3,739/9,624 Month: 610/974 Week: 223/276 Day: 63/34 Hour: 0/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Did the Flood really happen? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
Don't bother if all you have is unsupported fantasies. That is, don't just repeat what you have posted already.
You won't come up with anything other than pipe dreams.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Let me know when you have an independent source of information from any ancient time period to verify this method of dating.
Since you don't know anything about the many different processes involved in radioactive decay or how the many different and independent methods of radiometric dating work, it's pointless to explain why the methods verify each other. Ar-Ar dating measured the date of the Vesuvius eruption in 79 AD. Since the laws of physics haven't changed that's verification for all time. Of course carbon dating agrees with Lake Suigetsu varves, Cariaco Basin varves, and Fairbanks corals, none of which involve radioactivity. They all agree back to 50,000 years ago. And of course there's Message 555.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Yeah, I don't care about making my views match with all the scientific claims
Or with reality.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
The age of the Earth and life is solidly settled science, not conjecture. Your interpretation of the Bible is wrong in many particulars.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Well, it ain't wrong. Therefore it fits and your interpretation of the Bible is wrong.
You've claimed infallibility many times. You're fallible.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Nope, Bible's infallible, not me.
So you admit your interpretation is fallible. Thank you.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Rivers underground carve out very different channels than rivers on the surface do.
It's trivial to tell the difference. Typical underground:
Buried rivers:
Current surface rivers:
Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
It's trivial to tell the difference between a buried surface river and an underground river. The former shows a tree-like branching pattern, the latter has few branches.
We know this by looking at surface rivers and underground rivers today and understanding the physics of flowing water.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Dupe
Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
In both cases it would have branches.
The context is your claim that buried surface rivers are really rivers that were always underground.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
can't think in terms of buried surface rivers. I can't figure out how to explain them in relation to the Flood.
Nobody can. It can't be done. It takes time to cut river channels, even in soft sediment. It can't happen underwater. Buried surface rivers look nothing like underground rivers. There was no global fludde. Edited by JonF, : No reason given. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
It's a channel more or less shaped like a riverbed
It's a channel not at all shaped like a surface river. Surface rivers have extensive tree-like branching patterns. Channels formed underground have very few or no branches, and they aren't tree-like. Buried surface rivers are trivial to identify.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
a one time event is pretty much the definition of nonrepeatability observations Edited by Admin, : Fix quote.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 190 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Maybe if you say it 100 times more it will become true.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024