|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Right Side of the News | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 195 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
he's not stupid, he knows such a personality is not likely to hold to his promises.
He's stupid. He doesn't know that Kim is not his or our friend.
quote:No caveats, just a declaration of victory. Which everyone with a clue knew was BS. Edited by JonF, : No reason given. Edited by JonF, : No reason given. Edited by JonF, : No reason given. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Well, actually there WAS no longer a nuclear threat from North Korea even if Un goes on as usual because Trump will hold him to his promises no matter what Un does. Trump does not follow the normal patterns for these things, that's all. He's not a politician. He flatters and schmoozes the enemy and hopes for the best, but he carries a big stick.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given. Edited by Faith, : No reason given. Edited by Faith, : No reason given. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 195 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Trump wasn't flattering Kim {that's his family name}, he was tooting his own horn for an "accomplishment" he hadn't accomplished and likely never will.
Trump will hold him to his promises no matter what Un does
Sure he will. How? Tweeting at him? Sanctions which don't bother Kim but kill his people? Thermonuclear war? What? Edited by JonF, : No reason given. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
It WAS an accomplishment. Wait and see.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 421 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
LOL
Trump said he would target cultural sites. The man is simply beneath contempt.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Arsenals and other military sites masquerading as cultural, of course. That's a standard tactic of Islamicists, known very well to the Israelis. The Palestinian terrorists put arsenals in innocent people's homes. The Israelis have to warn the people to get out when they plan to attack.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 421 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Faith writes: Arsenals and other military sites masquerading as cultural, of course. So, just like you make up what is in the Bible you are making up what il Donaldo said. He said cultural sites. Hopefully once he is out of office and all the places he has a business interest have finished taking him to court the International Court will have a go at him. Justice demands it. Christian principles demand it. Humanity demands it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Just the usual attack on an innocent man.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 421 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Yet the fact remains that he said "cultural sites".
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22499 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
marc9000 writes: The news media controls who the FBI, CIA and DoJ investigate now? Who knew!
They don't control who they investigate, they control how much the public will be informed about those investigations. And what investigations would those be that the news media isn't telling us about?
Speaking of news media omissions, have you heard about the lawsuit settlement to the Covington Catholic student Nicholas Sandmann, from CNN, who made assumptions and lied about just who confronted who? It didn't seem to make the news much. I heard about it at Fox news. When it did get a quick mention, as we can see from this link, dances were done about just what CNN did. You've gone free association again. What has this got to do with the news media failing to report about FBI, CIA and DoJ investigations? Anyway, of course I heard about it. CNN reported it: CNN settles lawsuit with Nick Sandmann stemming from viral video controversy | CNN Business
You just cited an opinion piece. And you never do that? As factual support? No, of course not. You're a good Trumpist, accusing others of what you do yourself.
What corruption did Hunter Biden commit that requires investigation? Please be specific and precise. quote: That's just one of several. Eight Things to Know About the Biden Family's Culture of Corruption And there's more detail at The Biden family’s strange business history – POLITICO, a more trustworthy source. Seems like Hunter has a long history of trying to cash in on his father's name and political connections, and there's suspicion of fraud. I find that despicable, but is this the corruption you want investigated? It doesn't have anything to do with the Ukraine, and the statute of limitations has passed, so I don't see why you care.
You have a million excuses. I have a great idea for you. If you don't have facts behind what you say, don't say it. Political discussions are about opinions,... Apparently *your* political discussion is only about your opinions, but please don't project your lack of facts onto others. I'm relying on the testimony of Trump administration officials before the House Intelligence Committee. If you have factual information about Hunter Biden corruption related to the Ukraine then please bring it forward. But if your accusations and opinions are without factual basis then I think you should seek out facts before giving them further voice.
...your constant proclamations about a future socialist utopia aren't fact based. I've never said anything like that. To paraphrase Trump, read the thread. Please stick to the facts, if you can find some. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 195 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
We waited..
We saw. Trump failed having any effect on Kim. BTW, how is Trump going to hold Kim to his promises, now that Kim has announced he's breaking any promise he made?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22499 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
So now to answer this ridiculous stuff DIRECTLY with the videos from Erica Kasraie in Message 4323 and Message 4324. She says that the supposed "love" for Soleimeini was all propaganda by the government, who even required their own employees to make it look like he was loved, whereas the Iranian people in general are very very happy that Solameini was taken out and yes actually tweeting Thanks to Trump. Why do you believe Erica Kasraie? She's an Iranian expatriate who's spent most of her time the last few years working on behalf of the Libyan National Army. There's nothing wrong with that. The point is that she hasn't spent much time in Iran any time recently. About how well liked Soleimani was in Iran, this is from Qasem Soleimani - Wikipedia:
quote: And yes also "liking" his tweet in Farsi in support of the Iranian people in unprecedentedly great numbers. This is an incomplete sentence, so I might not get your meaning quite right. There's very little access to Twitter in Iran, so the vast majority of the likes must have come from the Iranian expatriate community which largely opposes the government. Trump's tweet received a great deal of attention because he's president of the United States. Any American president posting such a message would receive a great many likes. Why are you attaching any significance to this?
She mentions that she was taught to say "Death to America" when she was only seven. I was taught the Pledge of Allegiance when I was five.
How many actual Iranians share that sentiment is open to question since it's forced on them by the government. Good point.
Please listen to these videos, at least two minutes of the first one from 1:00,... Please follow the Forum Guidelines and rule 5:
If you make a solid argument then I'll probably watch the video, but you'll also need to provide evidence of Kasraie's credibility.
...and it would be really nice if you'd actually apologize but I won't hold my breath. Well, that's out of the blue. What would I be apologizing for - you don't specify. Are you just generally offended when people disagree with you or show you've once again trusted an unreliable source? --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22499 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
Faith writes: As Kasraie said, going up against our powerful military would be a bad move. Ah, Karaie, your new hero. Young love! Yes, it would be a bad move for Iran, but we have our own disincentives. Our military is the most powerful in the world, but it isn't invincible. It couldn't win in Vietnam, Iraq or Afghanistan. Look at Iran on a map sometime. It has nearly four times the area of Iraq and more than twice the population. In a war with Iran we *would* win, but we'd also rack up horrific losses. Remember Scud missiles from the Gulf War? Iran has much better. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 421 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Plus, terrorism is not limited by Nation State limitations or geography. We cannot use sanctions against terrorists or confiscate the bank accounts of terrorists or embargo terrorists or ...
Our military is designed around the limitations of Nation State conflicts but what is needed when dealing with terrorism is closer the undercover police work.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
There's no argument on Kasraie's video, it's just her statement of opinion about what's going on, how Soleimani was a terrorist and we must be in the twilight zone to be mourning the death of a terrorist, and that Iranians are glad he was taken out by Trump, and how Iranians have been tweeting pictures of celebrating his death and thanking Trump. She's certainly right wing and would work for right wing causes so that alone would turn you against her. I have no reason to try to persuade you to watch it seeing your post on it.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024