|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Right Side of the News | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5946 Joined: Member Rating: 5.5 |
{It Can't Happen Here by Sinclair Lewis} was an assigned reading back when I was in the 8th or 9th grade IIRC. About the same time 1984 and Animal Farm and Words in Thought and Action were mandatory reading. In 1969, my senior high school English teacher told us about it, which is why I read it. He also told us about Mark Twain's Letters From the Earth, which got me reading that anthology and other Mark Twain books (Roughing It was very enjoyable).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22479 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.7 |
RAZD writes: But you can't leave inflation out of the equation. Increased worker salaries mean that businesses must raise prices. But if the change is how profits are distributed within a company, inflation should not be an issue. I was speaking of entire industries increasing worker salaries, thereby increasing prices which contributes to inflation. I wasn't speaking of single companies. But considering just a single company, you suggest taking funds that would have been a company's profits and instead routing them to increased employee compensation. A company unilaterally raising wages within its industry would experience a number of negative consequences, including but not limited to lower competitiveness, increased cost of borrowing, lower dividends (if offered), lower stock price, decreased proceeds from stock offerings, and a diminished ability to expand the business or increase competitiveness.
Curiously I am amused by people so ready to accept a feudal type organization of corporations, when we fought a revolutionary war to get feudal type government out and replaced by a democratic system. You find it curious that you're amused?
The answer, of course, is worker owned cooperatives, where all the workers decide major company policies, like pay and benefits, and they hire and fire managers. Not surprisingly they are successful and have high worker satisfaction. They also seem to be more robust in startups than your standard business model companies. Mondragon Corporation - Wikipedia is a huge success story. I'm in favor of any successful way of running a company, of which there is more than one.
van Gogh I meant among people I know. And you don't wonder why there are no "van Gogh" type people in your circle of friends, but think you have a well rounded group. Interesting. I guess you don't know what you don't miss. You're responding to something never said. No claim of "well rounded" was ever made. You said "the $$ economy ignores" that "there is more to life than making money," and I responded that the larger and more important part of our lives outside of work is only made possible by working, that I don't know any families where neither parent worked, that I don't even know anyone who never worked. The point is that working makes possible the richness in our lives that we build outside of work. In personal terms, everyone I know is rich in terms of family and friends, which would not have happened had they not worked and earned money.
Yeah, sure, when I said "capitalism" I really meant "unchecked capitalism." "Capitalism" without any modifiers defaults to unchecked capitalism. What modifier should I use? Checked capitalism? Bridled capitalism? Restrained capitalism? Anyway, whatever modifier that might be, if you assume it's there every time anyone uses the word unmodified then you'll be right an astounding amount of the time. But getting to the point, you said, "It's a question of cultural values," and asked if we can't aspire to more than being a "money sucking CEO." Repeating the question, is capitalism antithetical to cultural values?
Capitalism is amoral, while socialism provides a moral culture. Done democratically it is OF the people FOR the people BY the people. I don't like the word "socialism" because it's become a loaded term, but if I understand you then we agree, social programs are very important. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1425 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
But considering just a single company, you suggest taking funds that would have been a company's profits and instead routing them to increased employee compensation. A company unilaterally raising wages within its industry would experience a number of negative consequences, including but not limited to lower competitiveness, increased cost of borrowing, lower dividends (if offered), lower stock price, decreased proceeds from stock offerings, and a diminished ability to expand the business or increase competitiveness. Why? We see companies with substantially higher wages making similar or higher profits > Costco for one example, cooperatives for another. You seem to miss the point. All wages are paid out of gross profits. We currently have businesses with CEO pay 700 times lowest worker wages. The Mondragon cooperatives have a limit of 9 to 1 for highest pay to lowest. They account for substantial portion of the Spanish Economy (~1/3) It's just a matter of how wages are allocated from gross profits.
You're responding to something never said. No claim of "well rounded" was ever made. You said "the $$ economy ignores" that "there is more to life than making money," and I responded that the larger and more important part of our lives outside of work is only made possible by working, that I don't know any families where neither parent worked, that I don't even know anyone who never worked. The point is that working makes possible the richness in our lives that we build outside of work. In personal terms, everyone I know is rich in terms of family and friends, which would not have happened had they not worked and earned money. Now I would say that doing things with other people makes possible the richness in our lives. I have participated in many community orchestras and bands, was a boy scout leader for many years, and other volunteer programs, been part of our towns planning board, etc. and I find friends in all places, several of which I value more than any from work. Our town has an art renaissance zone to promote art and a historic society to preserve local history. To me there is much more to life that work and fellow workers. All these volunteer organizations are part of our social economy but not part of the $$ economy.
What modifier should I use? Checked capitalism? Bridled capitalism? Restrained capitalism? ... One you've used is regulated.
... Anyway, whatever modifier that might be, if you assume it's there every time anyone uses the word unmodified then you'll be right an astounding amount of the time. Except when listening to republicans. Take marc9000 for instance and his claim that a free market will regulate itself better than government regulation.
I don't like the word "socialism" because it's become a loaded term, but if I understand you then we agree, social programs are very important. And yet socialism is highly and increasingly popular in the youth these days. Republicans overplayed their hand in demonizing it. The bugbears have failed to be worse than the GOP. Enjoyby our ability to understand RebelAmericanZenDeist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Mississippi Republicans Steal Millions From Welfare Programs | Crooks and Liars
quote:It's OK If You're A Republican. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 188 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, for obeying the law and telling the truth.
National Security Council attorney Yevgeny Vindman, for being the brother of an enemy of the state (AKA Trump). Ambassador Gordon Sondland, for obeying the law and telling the truth. Absolute fealty to the God-emperor is mandatory! Dissent will not be tolerated! The Constitution and our laws are null and void.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22479 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.7 |
RAZD writes: But considering just a single company, you suggest taking funds that would have been a company's profits and instead routing them to increased employee compensation. A company unilaterally raising wages within its industry would experience a number of negative consequences, including but not limited to lower competitiveness, increased cost of borrowing, lower dividends (if offered), lower stock price, decreased proceeds from stock offerings, and a diminished ability to expand the business or increase competitiveness. Why? Because of their reduced profits relative to other companies in their industry.
We see companies with substantially higher wages making similar or higher profits > Costco for one example, cooperatives for another. Who are you comparing Costco to? What are you comparing cooperatives to?
You seem to miss the point. All wages are paid out of gross profits. Employee compensation is an expense deducted from revenue. At a gross level of detail, revenue minus expenses equals profits.
We currently have businesses with CEO pay 700 times lowest worker wages. CEO compensation is a separate issue from unilaterally raising employee compensation within an industry, but I of course agree that executive compensation is out of control.
The Mondragon cooperatives have a limit of 9 to 1 for highest pay to lowest. They account for substantial portion of the Spanish Economy (~1/3) Spain's GDP was $1.3 trillion in 2017. Mondragon's revenues were $6.5 billion in 2018. It's less than 1% of the Spanish economy.
It's just a matter of how wages are allocated from gross profits. Employee compensation is an expense, not a deduction from profits. Think about it. If employee compensation was paid out of profits, then companies with no profits could not compensate their employees.
Now I would say that doing things with other people makes possible the richness in our lives. I agree, and in most jobs you are doing things with other people.
I have participated in many community orchestras and bands, was a boy scout leader for many years, and other volunteer programs, been part of our towns planning board, etc. and I find friends in all places, several of which I value more than any from work. Our town has an art renaissance zone to promote art and a historic society to preserve local history. To me there is much more to life than work and fellow workers. Of course. That why's I talked of all the richness of life outside of work. Naturally people value all their friends, whether they met them through work or not.
All these volunteer organizations are part of our social economy but not part of the $$ economy. Volunteering is a great way to contribute to the community, but I think most volunteer organizations would be part of the $$ economy. The YMCA has hundreds of thousands of volunteers, but it's definitely part of the $$ economy, as I think most if not all nonprofits would be. And volunteers get significant discounts on member and program fees, so they're compensated for their volunteering. Towns are part of the $$ economy, even if committee work is done by unpaid volunteers. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9140 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.3
|
But considering just a single company, you suggest taking funds that would have been a company's profits and instead routing them to increased employee compensation. A company unilaterally raising wages within its industry would experience a number of negative consequences, including but not limited to lower competitiveness, increased cost of borrowing, lower dividends (if offered), lower stock price, decreased proceeds from stock offerings, and a diminished ability to expand the business or increase competitiveness. More conventional wisdom, that is not wisdom. Conservative economic truths seemingly do not survive when the real world is looked at. Costco was mentioned as classic case. Out here in WI/MN are we have convenience store chain named Kwik Trip. They pay a starting wage $2-4/hour higher than the competition. They offer benefits to even their part time employees. 40% of pre-tax profits go back to employees. The profit sharing bonus averages to about 5-9% of an employee's annual salary.So how is Kwik Trip doing? They are kicking the competitions ass. Most chains in Duluth-Superior have left. Kwik Trip has motivated happy employees. Customers see that and appreciate that. The chain with the highest employee costs is the most successful. Jobs at Kwik Trip I don't like the word "socialism" because it's become a loaded term
What term should be used? Instead of coming up with inaccurate words maybe we should actually educate people about what terms like capitalism and socialism mean.Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 414 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Theo writes: What term should be used? Instead of coming up with inaccurate words maybe we should actually educate people about what terms like capitalism and socialism mean. Can I get a BIG AMEN! We have utterly failed in the task of educating citizens in the US and unfortunately one of the biggest causes has been STEM. The goal of education should not be just training workers. When we concentrated on that we threw out the humanities as well as all civic education and yet expect our voters to be able to make reasoned fact based decisions. Ain't gonna happen! Edited by jar, : fix sub-title
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22479 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.7 |
Percy writes: More conventional wisdom, that is not wisdom. Conservative economic truths seemingly do not survive when the real world is looked at. What "conservative economic truths" are you referring to?
Costco was mentioned as classic case. Mention was all that was done, but my position is that there are many ways to organize successful companies. I'm happy for Costco that they're doing so well (I have only your and RAZD's word for that, I haven't looked this up), but just because Costco is doing well doesn't mean that their corporate approach is the only way of being a successful company.
So how is Kwik Trip doing? They are kicking the competitions ass. Most chains in Duluth-Superior have left. Nothing against Kwik Trip, I know nothing about them, but fact checking your claim, if you enter "duluth mn convenience stores" into Google Maps it displays more Holiday Stationstores than Kwik Trips. "Duluth mn kwik trip" shows 9 locations, while "Duluth mn holiday stationstores" shows 17. I don't consider Google Maps authoritative, but that's the only data I have. You and RAZD are making claims that you're not backing up with evidence. Where does your evidence of the success of Kwik Trip, Costco, cooperatives, etc., come from? When RAZD mentioned Mondragon he included one checkable fact, that it was 1/3 of the Spanish economy, and that turned out to be overstated by a factor of nearly 70. It's actually about 1/200 of the Spanish economy, or half a percent. By way of contrast, the biggest company in the US, Walmart, is 2% of American GDP. Again, I have nothing against Kwik Trip, Costco, cooperatives, Mondragon, or any other company. I think it's wonderful that they're successful, but I'd like to have a fact-based rather than unsupported-claim-based discussion.
I don't like the word "socialism" because it's become a loaded term What term should be used? Instead of coming up with inaccurate words maybe we should actually educate people about what terms like capitalism and socialism mean. I don't think the term "capitalism" is being misused (correct me if I'm wrong), but "socialism" is. Socialism means state ownership of business and industry. What people like Bernie Sanders mean when they say socialism is actually a shortened form of democratic socialism, but that's not all that different from plain old socialism if you look it up: Democratic socialism - Wikipedia. People are in favor of social programs and a social safety net, not socialism. Trump will slaughter anyone embracing the socialist label in November. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8527 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.2 |
You would have gotten a BIG AMEN if you hadn't go off into the STEM BS.
Our schools are just a start of a basic education. Awareness that things are out there. The real education comes at people every day starting in high school and then forever brought to you by the constant blare of biased media. And they get to pick and choose which media is most entertaining to them since entertainment, not education, is the goal of the 10th grade mentality of the majority of American society. We *could* educate our low mentality populous to higher levels with consistent and accurate explanations but there are too many large, loud, moneyed voices out there with strong political interests in doing the opposite. STEM is NOT the cause of this issue. It holds promise as a major fix with its reliance on critical thinking skills. No, jar. You get a BIG BOO! for that one. Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 414 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
STEM is simply systematic of the belief that the goal of basic education is to make workers.
Sorry but STEM is a BIG problem because it is the cover for eliminate teaching people how to think.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8527 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.2 |
Disagree, strongly. You've moved onto a different planet, jar.
You can't teach core STEM curriculum without teaching critical and creative thinking skills. Science and mathematics require the mental discipline of critical thinking and technology and engineering require the creative juices that comes from critical thinking. The more scientists we make from our schools the more critical of political and social bullshit this society will become.Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 414 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
That might be true if STEM was actually implemented like you claim but what I see in the so called STEM schools is hardly producing critical thinkers.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9140 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.3 |
What "conservative economic truths" are you referring to?
That investing in human capital; wages and benefits; is detrimental to the competitiveness and success of a company. You, yourself, have made such a claim.
Mention was all that was done, but my position is that there are many ways to organize successful companies. I'm happy for Costco that they're doing so well (I have only your and RAZD's word for that, I haven't looked this up), but just because Costco is doing well doesn't mean that their corporate approach is the only way of being a successful company.
But they are a prime example that high wages and benefits does not make a company uncompetitive. Sure companies can be successful with low wages and crappy benefits; Walmart. But no one made that claim. You are throwing out a strawman. Walmart's success is on the shoulder of public benefits programs those on the right excoriate.
quote: 3 Reasons Costco Is a Great Company They attract the best, so get above average productivity. And Costco employees are not dependent on public assistance.
Nothing against Kwik Trip, I know nothing about them, but fact checking your claim, if you enter "duluth mn convenience stores" into Google Maps it displays more Holiday Stationstores than Kwik Trips. "Duluth mn kwik trip" shows 9 locations, while "Duluth mn holiday stationstores" shows 17. I don't consider Google Maps authoritative, but that's the only data I have.
This where a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. First of all Holiday Stores have been in the Duluth area for over 25 years. Kwik Trip first entered the market in 2015. Second of all, in order to get a feel for the number of stores you can not just search Duluth. The area around here is known as the Twin Ports. It includes Duluth, Superior, WI and surrounding cities and towns. By pulling up the websites for these companies I can get an accurate count of stores in the area. As Kwik Trip was not even in this area before 2015, I am going to include the area that encompasses their expansion post 2015. Holiday Stationstores has 20 locations, Kwik Trip has 21. All of Kwik Trips were built post 2015. The newest Holiday Store is at least 15 years old. But this is all another strawman. I never said they were the only chain in the area or that no one else is successful. Your claim is that higher wages and better benefits makes a company uncompetitve, This is patently not true.Find your nearest Kwik Trip location - Kwik Trip | Kwik Star https://www.holidaystationstores.com/Locations/Search You and RAZD are making claims that you're not backing up with evidence. Where does your evidence of the success of Kwik Trip, Costco,
Are you claiming they are not successful? Do I Have to post articles showing their growth? Here is one.Here’s Where Costco Is Opening in 2019 Would an unsuccessful company be making $2.5 billion in capital improvements in next 5 years https://madison.com/...9abd-8d5e-59e3-874a-901d2e15f863.html What more evidence do you want to show that Costco and Kwik Trip are successful companies?
Socialism means state ownership of business and industry
In fact using Wiki as you did, this is not correct.
quote:Socialism - Wikipedia quote:State ownership - Wikipedia What you have defined is state socialism.
quote:State socialism - Wikipedia Trump will slaughter anyone embracing the socialist label in November.
But no one is embracing that label are they? You seem to want to pin it on them, but no one is embracing it. Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9140 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.3 |
It is really just a cop out. A sop to your feelings.
quote:Newsflash: You Can’t Be Financially Conservative And Socially Liberal – FEM Newsmagazine Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie? |
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024