Mankind and dinosaur side by side ? ?

"Since you ask "Where are your transitional species ?, I repeat, what would you accept as a transitional?"
--I don't think the argument is rightly posed as 'where are the transitionals', but more it should be 'where is the transition'.------------------

What about is the quantity of seemingly carnivorous Dinosaur fossils found?------------------

"Well, creationists think that any evidence that contradicts creationism is being interpreted wrongly."
--My opinion on interperetation of evidence and data on the question of where is it valid, is that if it contredicts creationism, I should either find out what has not been considered, be willingly ignorant, or change my system of belief on Earth history. In my opinion, scientific discovery is superior. Though obviously, let us not take this to our heads. I have always found that the more I understand any concept or scientific observation, the more compatable it becomes, this is my personal reason for believing what I believe. Though ofcourse, the more this happens, the more I must fashion my inference on the past to be harder and sharper, which is infact, the strength of science, not its weakness.------------------

--I think that the opposing participants in this forum are bashing techristian a bit too harshly here, almost every one of his posts gets on average about 5-7 replies from the active OE's here. Though this may be because he shows a considerable amount of arrogance, and much too much convidence in each one of his assertions. I'd like to be part of this somewhat, my post #47 was a short enough question, anyone for some insite?-------------------

"JM: TC, do you mean, how many carnivorous Dinosaur fossils have been found? Your question is a bit vague."
--Yes it is rather vague, though it is what is to be looked for,
to be specific, it would be to sort these various carnivores into a table for how many of each type found. I know that there have been very few relatively complete T. Rex's found, and if it is the same for the many others, there is little to be validly conclusive in this argument."I also want to call your attention back to your flood model thread. Are you preparing an answer, or have you abandonded the topic?"
--Yes, I am going down the list in the forums, I'm of course in Evolution now. I am not abandoning the topic, but like, unto the same I cannot give a conclusive answer, most especially to the workings of your equation. Simply because it requires an input of variables, to find these variables, research needs to be done.------------------

"JM: I've been banned repeatedly from CARM. It's sort of an on-again, off again thing and I finally just quit posting. The ruler of that site is also pretty heavy, if unevenly, handed about censorship. He also had one creationist pushing him to 'ban' me. I finally got so frustrated with the 'you're allowed' and 'you're not allowed' to and fro, that I gave up. "
--I've heard of the CARM forum, though after attempting to handle two forums, creationweb.org and percipients , I find it much too difficult, as usual at the time I was heavily bombarded with commentary and replies, many significantly extensive. I think I have found that Percipients forum suits me well, appetizing navigation and the frequent participants are in the most part, intelligent and worth the while in contributing with.------------------

"New" opponents usually get the most attention. When we get used to them it settles down a little bit. But often they vanish before that happens. First few weeks are probably very hard on them."
--Yes this is evidently true. I never left this forum and continued discussions in the most part, my frequent posts seemingly attracted opponents, as you can see in this forums history, it basically started to take off right around the vicinity of my joining in mid December."As for your question, what do you mean? By species or by individual finds?"
--If I read you correctly, both? See my reply #83.------------------

"TC, maybe you could visit his site and give us your thoughts."
--Thank you for your inquisition for my incite. Well you most certainly can tell that techristian and the writer in the article he supplied is his own! My thoughts on Australopithecus is that it was a rather unusual ape, now extinct as is numerous other types in the fossil record and the same is happening today. Australopithecus was an unusual knuckle walking ape with their longer curved fingers and toes. Some such as ICR and AIG make the claim that 'CAT scans of australopithecine inner ear canals (reflecting posture and balance) by anatomist DR Fred Spoor and his colleagues at University College, London, showed they did not walk habitually upright', unfortunately, I haven't too much knowledge on this process so I would not use it as support, still speculative, it is interesting.------------------

​

[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 04-19-2002]

"I've also pulled the plug after noticing the bannings, leaving benind a few comments. I think it will be a very quiet message board with very little difference of opinion - probably the way the manager prefers it. I invited him to come out of his haven and try a quality board such as this one. I won't hold my breath in anticipation."
--That would be nice to have him over here, I do recall someone giving him credibility in intelligence. Though by other comments I would have to guess that he is very arrogant. Mabye If he tried this quallity board, I might be able to rub off on him --Also, is he more into the science, or biblical philosophy, or what catagory would you place him in as dominantly discussiong or showing knowledge of.-------------------

"TC, I linked the board in messge #87. You may care to peruse and make up your own mind, I wouldn't want to prejudice your view. "
--That bad huh? ------------------