Wookie B writes:
Whereas your last prior post stated the subject was about the source of independent information, as I pointed out the subject wasn't about the source, but that independent information exists.
The two are inextricably intertwined. If something exists, it has a source.
Wookie B writes:
The information that distinctly makes up Macbeth, did exist in the mind of Shakespeare.
You have not provided any evidence about how the information got there - i.e. the source. My contention is that it was created in situ, in Shakespeare's brain. Your claim is that it had some abstract existence independent of Shakespeare's brain. You need to support that claim.
Wookie B writes:
There is no evidence that meaningful information is dependent on matter.
Again, you have it backwards. We have no evidence that information is independent from matter. We have no evidence of unicorns. Same thing.
Wookie B writes:
So, if your claim is that there is no evidence that information is 'not dependent' on matter, that means there is evidence that information is not 'not dependent' on matter, or that there is evidence that information is dependent on matter.
Seriously, do you think that pile of multiple negatives makes any sense?
"I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"