Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1

A bit more detail might be helpful, including quoting the particular portion of the message you're addressing.

Your last three messages have been one sentence. This is a discussion board, not Twitter.Participation in the science forums assumes a familiarity with basic science. Threads on specific topics will not be turned into discussions of basic science. They will be kept on topic by moderators.But even the most basic science or scientific principle can be challenged. Simply propose new topics over at Proposed New Topics.

I have the same reaction as JonF. Perhaps one of the Social and Religious Issues forums might be better suited for you. For example, take a look at Faith and Belief and Bible Study.Or you could propose a thread over at Proposed New Topics arguing that the Bible story of creation should be considered scientific.

JonF does not mention Noah in Message 1288 that you replied to. There was a great deal of factual information in that post. You ignored all of it.

I've been too busy to moderate lately but I'm going to attempt to begin moderating both this thread and the Did the Flood really happen? thread.Going forward all posts should be evidence based. All content-free or snarky posting should cease. When someone posts several such messages I'll issue a one day suspension.Please try to avoid handing out reading assignments of old posts from way in the past, which is similar to a bare link. Summarize the evidence and argument and provide a link to the old post as a reference.