Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9071 total)
43 online now:
Minnemooseus (Adminnemooseus) (1 member, 42 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Upcoming Birthdays: Percy
Post Volume: Total: 893,075 Year: 4,187/6,534 Month: 401/900 Week: 107/150 Day: 0/38 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did the Flood really happen?
dad
Member (Idle past 566 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1606 of 2370 (876916)
05-30-2020 12:41 PM
Reply to: Message 1603 by Admin
05-30-2020 11:57 AM


Re: Moderator Request
So you want to call them science threads when they are religious nonsense and not be challenged in the fraud. I see.

Edited by dad, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1603 by Admin, posted 05-30-2020 11:57 AM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1610 by Admin, posted 05-30-2020 5:56 PM dad has replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 6626
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 3.1


Message 1607 of 2370 (876940)
05-30-2020 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 1605 by dad
05-30-2020 12:40 PM


Re: Layers build slowly over time ... lots of time
they are just beliefs painted onto evidences.

So pick one and show us how these scientific facts are just beliefs. Show us *your* evidence that contradicts what has been presented. Show us that "faulty premise" we cannot support.

You're big on spouting words denying our facts but you do not show how/where/why they are wrong.

You want to show us we are wrong? Quit with the big mouth jabbering and present your evidence.


Factio Republicana delenda est.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1605 by dad, posted 05-30-2020 12:40 PM dad has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1608 by dad, posted 05-30-2020 5:00 PM AZPaul3 has replied
 Message 1620 by dad, posted 06-19-2020 2:19 AM AZPaul3 has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 566 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1608 of 2370 (876941)
05-30-2020 5:00 PM
Reply to: Message 1607 by AZPaul3
05-30-2020 4:07 PM


Re: Layers build slowly over time ... lots of time
Tree rings. If threes grew in weeks obviously rings did not represent a yearly pattern as they now do. You believe nature was the same. You can't prove it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1607 by AZPaul3, posted 05-30-2020 4:07 PM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1609 by AZPaul3, posted 05-30-2020 5:19 PM dad has taken no action
 Message 1611 by jar, posted 05-30-2020 5:56 PM dad has replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 6626
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 3.1


Message 1609 of 2370 (876949)
05-30-2020 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 1608 by dad
05-30-2020 5:00 PM


Re: Layers build slowly over time ... lots of time
You know we have seasons and we *know* the winter/summer cycle is responsible for each ring in a tree. You know we understand how seasons occur. These are demonstrable facts that you cannot deny unless you want to look really stupid like a flat Earther.

What makes you think trees grew in weeks instead of years? What evidence can you present that the ring could result without the winter/summer cycle? Or, what evidence can you present that the yearly cycle was so much faster just a few thousand years ago?


Factio Republicana delenda est.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1608 by dad, posted 05-30-2020 5:00 PM dad has taken no action

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12787
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 1610 of 2370 (876955)
05-30-2020 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 1606 by dad
05-30-2020 12:41 PM


Dad Suspended 24 Hours
See Message 1606.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1606 by dad, posted 05-30-2020 12:41 PM dad has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1613 by dad, posted 06-01-2020 3:35 AM Admin has replied

  
jar
Member
Posts: 33887
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 2.8


Message 1611 of 2370 (876956)
05-30-2020 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 1608 by dad
05-30-2020 5:00 PM


Just as the fact that there is no "Bible™" ...
... there is NO science in the Bible.

We can begin with the fact that only an utter **** would believe that Genesis 1 was a creation tale.

Since the absurdities in Genesis 1 can be discarded by anyone who has had at least a third grade education a reasonable person would ask why the author of Genesis 1 wrote such utter nonsense in the format of a Creation Myth.

Once we can place Genesis 1 within the realm of reality we can move on to the next fantasy.


My Sister's Website: Rose Hill Studios     My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1608 by dad, posted 05-30-2020 5:00 PM dad has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1612 by dad, posted 06-01-2020 3:34 AM jar has taken no action
 Message 1618 by dad, posted 06-19-2020 2:15 AM jar has taken no action

  
dad
Member (Idle past 566 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1612 of 2370 (876984)
06-01-2020 3:34 AM
Reply to: Message 1611 by jar
05-30-2020 5:56 PM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible™" ...
There is no science in so called sciences that deal in origins. The name is falsely applied.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1611 by jar, posted 05-30-2020 5:56 PM jar has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 1614 by vimesey, posted 06-01-2020 4:10 AM dad has replied
 Message 1615 by ringo, posted 06-01-2020 12:45 PM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 566 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1613 of 2370 (876985)
06-01-2020 3:35 AM
Reply to: Message 1610 by Admin
05-30-2020 5:56 PM


evc Suspended 24 Hours
Ha

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1610 by Admin, posted 05-30-2020 5:56 PM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1616 by Admin, posted 06-02-2020 2:12 PM dad has taken no action
 Message 1626 by Phat, posted 06-19-2020 10:49 AM dad has taken no action

  
vimesey
Member
Posts: 1306
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 1614 of 2370 (876986)
06-01-2020 4:10 AM
Reply to: Message 1612 by dad
06-01-2020 3:34 AM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible™" ...
There is no science in so called sciences that deal in origins. The name is falsely applied.

Assertion.
No evidence.
Fail.


Could there be any greater conceit, than for someone to believe that the universe has to be simple enough for them to be able to understand it ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1612 by dad, posted 06-01-2020 3:34 AM dad has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1617 by dad, posted 06-19-2020 1:38 AM vimesey has replied

  
ringo
Member
Posts: 19517
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 1615 of 2370 (877010)
06-01-2020 12:45 PM
Reply to: Message 1612 by dad
06-01-2020 3:34 AM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible™" ...
dad writes:

There is no science in so called sciences that deal in origins. The name is falsely applied.


Again, you do not get to define science. Nobody cares what you think science is.

"I'm Fallen and I can't get up!"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1612 by dad, posted 06-01-2020 3:34 AM dad has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1619 by dad, posted 06-19-2020 2:16 AM ringo has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12787
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.2


(1)
Message 1616 of 2370 (877043)
06-02-2020 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 1613 by dad
06-01-2020 3:35 AM


Dad Suspended 24 Hours
dad writes:

Ha

Continues to display a disregard for board moderation.

Suspensions can range from 24 hours to permanently.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1613 by dad, posted 06-01-2020 3:35 AM dad has taken no action

  
dad
Member (Idle past 566 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1617 of 2370 (877587)
06-19-2020 1:38 AM
Reply to: Message 1614 by vimesey
06-01-2020 4:10 AM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible™" ...
Do you assert that the stories of science about origins are true?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1614 by vimesey, posted 06-01-2020 4:10 AM vimesey has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1622 by vimesey, posted 06-19-2020 5:16 AM dad has taken no action

  
dad
Member (Idle past 566 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1618 of 2370 (877590)
06-19-2020 2:15 AM
Reply to: Message 1611 by jar
05-30-2020 5:56 PM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible™" ...
Satanic blather aside, science has nothing to say about it either way.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1611 by jar, posted 05-30-2020 5:56 PM jar has taken no action

  
dad
Member (Idle past 566 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1619 of 2370 (877591)
06-19-2020 2:16 AM
Reply to: Message 1615 by ringo
06-01-2020 12:45 PM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible™" ...
No one gets to define science, what, you though you did?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1615 by ringo, posted 06-01-2020 12:45 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1623 by ringo, posted 06-19-2020 10:32 AM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 566 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1620 of 2370 (877592)
06-19-2020 2:19 AM
Reply to: Message 1607 by AZPaul3
05-30-2020 4:07 PM


Re: Layers build slowly over time ... lots of time
The issue is whether orin sciences use beliefs in models not whether they are wrong or right.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1607 by AZPaul3, posted 05-30-2020 4:07 PM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1621 by AZPaul3, posted 06-19-2020 3:43 AM dad has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022