Catholics are making it up.

What ulterior motives would the critics of your dogma have?

Forget about that fairy tale. Talk about reality. Why would I want to discredit somebody who never existed? Point out the false logic. But you're the one who throws out the Bible. Jesus promoted inclusive humanism. Why are you afraid to discuss that?

You don't know half as much as you think you do.

We've been in the "last days" for two thousand years. Isn't that fairy tale getting a bit tired by now? We've had that for two thousand years - and for two thousand years before that and for two thousand years before that and....So, is #1 all you've got? HOW, in your addled brain, can you consider that a bad thing? Jesus said, "Whosoever." It's excusivity that's based on hatred. You're perfectly willing to watch the rest of us roast in hell. Again, nobody's trying to shut you up. Please, answer your posts. You don't need an enemy to do that for you.

And yet you didn't say anything at all about inclusive humanism.Try again. "Jesus promoted inclusive humanism." Discuss.

The topic is, "The CATHOLICS are making it up." I didn't do any such thing. I clearly said, "We've been in the "last days" for two thousand years. Isn't that fairy tale getting a bit tired by now?" Message 450 You're being dishonest. You know damn well that it's the same argument you use against the things you don't believe in. I'm not parroting anything. I don't even know the scholars' arguments.And you didn't answer the question. What possible reason could I have for discrediting somebody who didn't exist? Do you have a reason to discredit Frodo? Yes it is. It is the default literally by definition. Where does that come from? It has NOTHING to do with how much spare change you give out. It's about you throwing out the Bible. You throw out the part in Genesis 3 where God said as plain as day that "the Fall" was a GOOD thing. You throw out the part where Jesus told the rich man what he must do to be saved. You throw out the part where the Roman Church DID what Jesus told the rich man to do. You throw out the part where Jesus said that the judgement depends on what people DO for the least of His brothers. You throw out the part where He said that pretending to believe by mouthing, "Lord! Lord!" will not fool Him. Shall I go on? Or do you have the courage to defend your throwing out those passages? Nope. The false logic is obviously yours. You use the same logic as I'm using to deny the existence of leprechauns, etc. But you don't know the authors' motives. Even if it was evidence, it's evidence you don't have. Try using your head first. How can you use a book that was written two thousand years ago to back up your claims about what has happened since the book was written? So, for somebody who doesn't have a clue - in your words - it seems like I know Jesus better than you do. That's because you've been swallowing the snake oil.

I just Googled "limbo abolished" and "purgatory abolished". Every major news service seems to agree that limbo has beeb abolished.

So post something to support your viewpoint.