Should we teach both evolution and religion in school?

Cheer leading empty blather.

Insults to God's word aside, no, I have no reason to ever deny evidence. I simply point out that your incessant splattering of your beliefs on to the evidence is not fact or science.

Just wait and see who silences opposing beliefs here. But since you were here a long time you already know. Why pretend?

quote:

---

Tree rings form because of..

---

Irrelevant. How anything forms now in this nature would only have relevance if you can prove this nature existed.
Finding other dead trees does not help if they also grew in that former nature.Carbon ratios do not matter if they were made in the former nature.

That is correct, NOW trees grow in a seasonal/yearly pattern. Now all we need is this present nature in the past so we could also say the same for rings in the far past!

If all you offered was fact and knowledge rather than diss Scripture that may be the case.

quote:

---

Religion is the greatest evil ever to infect the mind of humanity. Your scripture is evil in thought and deed. It is lie masquerading as truth to enslave the mind.

​

There is no utility for humanity, there is no relevance to reality, there is no good for the world in your scripture or your religion. There is nothing but blood, pain and death in its words. Enslavement is its goal.

​

Your book is nothing but an excuse to subjugate the people, enrich your priests and to kill the minds of the children. Your own conception of your god is as a bloodthirsty monster with the entrails of the innocent still in its teeth.

---

Thanks for the blasphemy and hatred of other peoples beliefs. I don't think you have any worries about moderation here. That puke apparently is accepted in a science thread.

quote:

---

Are you suggesting that kids should be taught that the existence of birds, mammals, reptiles etc. is a complete scientific mystery with no evidenced explanation?

---

Yes, of course. Anything else is fraud.

Not sure why you spam a bunch of links. Try posting a sentence or paragraph from a link and debate that, using a link only as a source we can check.
By the way, I am aware of the created trait of being able to adapt and evolve, so evolution is not an issue at all. Where evolving started or stopped is an issue. The TOE has no clue what evolved from what, or when or why, and has piled error on false belief and baseless assumptions, while totally misunderstanding the fossil record, genetics and other basics.Edited by dad, : No reason given.

So you like creationism? Or do you hate it? I can say I hate 'evolutionism'. So why would a majority of people in a jurisiction not be able to have taught the beliefs they choose and like?Edited by dad, : No reason given.

quote:

---

Tiktaalik was only discovered because evolutionary theory combined with geology predicted exactly where Tiktaalik should be found.

---

I suggest that this is nothing unique to your religion and belief set (you think of as science).I would also expect that some creatures in the migration out from Eden would rapidly evolve and adapt as needed. If a fish encountered areas that were swampy or had land and water, it might need to adapt to land in order to feed and survive. No big deal. That does not require your imaginary ages, or a godless origin.

quote:

---

No, science does not deal in proofs.

---

Neither do politicians or con men selling bridges they don't own. Nothing to brag about.

Real science is based on evidence. We can test and repeat and observe and etc. That is proof in a sense. There is no proof in any sense whatsoever for the whopper fables of origin so called sciences.
If you knew the limits of science and what it is really all about you would know that.

quote:

---

However, with this kind of vague understanding of evolution, you won't understand when and why more than a single selection pressure has to be used to achieve a successful treatment.

---

Who really cares about selection pressure when it comes to what was created or not? Who cares about why creatures needed to adapt and evolve after being created? If there was a creation, then who could really know what was here already, and what all came as a result of evolving from that starting point?If fish needed to adapt to land in the far past, well, big deal. If God created some fishy like thingies that were suited to both, that is fine also. Who really knows?

Keep blowing smoke. Too bad you haven't enough smoke to cover your busted beliefs that you thought were sciencey.