|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Did the Flood really happen? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
That is rich. You claim that because you can't see anything else but your beliefs colouring evidence, that they must be that color!
I won't bother responding to the usual blasphemy and hatred spam bits of your post.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
quote: All religions say that. Ho hum.
quote: That is why you must stop offering beliefs as facts or science.
quote:Since you insist in engaging in name calling for other beliefs, I guess I should indulge. Satan is often pictured as a goat. Even in the bible the sheep are separated from the goats. So called science then, is the goat book. quote: The science models of the past are based on the belief nature was the same. Do you have any evidence outside your goat book of fables and beliefs from hell that nature was the same? Those wishing to elevate their goat book to science must have real evidence and be able to produce it here. Work on that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
Rather than an intelligent reply we get blather about 'oh, I am the only one who knows what science really is, but I can't post it'. Seriously?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
Computers are not evidence stellar evolution in deep space is valid. Focus. Nor are computers evidence a worldwide flood never happened. Etc.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
Of course scientists dealing in the real world usually know what they are doing (even if in some cases it is evil as hell)
The so called sciences dealing in origins stories have no practical application in the real world though.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
When you know something you should be able to post it rather than brag you could post it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
If you offer computers or anything else in this world as evidence that so called science that deals in origins fables knows what it is talking about, you need to show the connection.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
No they don't find ages of rocks. Finding oil doesn't involve that as much as you thought it did.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
Planes do not fly to the edges of the universe. Really. Planes big or small, or toy planes have zero to do with origin arguments. Your Buzz LightYear imagination is showing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
Origin claims get no results. Fables are like that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
The stories science tells about the origins of life and the universe etc. Those ones.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
You can say you know more than God if you like...for all it's worth. The thing is you need to post it, not talk big.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
TOE, and the BB.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
Well, the topic here is Geology and the Flood. One of the key articles of debate on this issue is the dates. Science says 65 or seventy million years ago (If the KT was near the flood time) and Scripture and Jewish tradition say something closer to 4500 years ago.
The main reason science uses old ages is because of radioactive decay dating. The main reason they do this is because of a belief that laws and forces/nature were always the same on earth. (not talking about the far universe here). So, prove (evidence solidly) that it was? Otherwise, why would we not assume much of the ratios we see were part of creation, and that the former nature also affected ratios? Why must we believe your positive claim?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
dad Member (Idle past 1337 days) Posts: 337 Joined: |
quote:Because they do not disagree with me about the actual reasons they find oil. The past left us patterns of layers laid down. We have discovered that in certain areas and layers oil and certain things tend to be more likely. It doesn't matter about what phantom imaginary ages people imagine that layers were formed in! Whether a layer was put down 5500 years ago in the former nature, or whether it was put down (insert belief based ages based on a same nature in the past here). The result is the same we would tend to see oil in certain layers. That's why.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024