Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,471 Year: 3,728/9,624 Month: 599/974 Week: 212/276 Day: 52/34 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did the Flood really happen?
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1764 of 2370 (878832)
07-05-2020 12:57 PM
Reply to: Message 1757 by ringo
07-05-2020 9:20 AM


Re: the world that then was
quote:
All you have to do is present some evidence that nature changed.
Unless you can prove it was the same there is no need. We believe what we choose. The claim that nature was the same is not falsifiable. (able to be proved to be false). Science cannot prove it false or true!
quote:
you'd have to propose some explaination for HOW it changed
Since science doesn't know either was no one needs to or can show how some unknown nature in the past changed. All that is needed is to realize science only believes and does not know.
quote:
you'd have to propose some explaination for HOW it changed
Showing a one liner that has no content or specifics to be false is not denial.
quote:
...It does tell "us".
How does a dead tree tell you how fast it used to grow 4600 years ago exactly?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1757 by ringo, posted 07-05-2020 9:20 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1768 by ringo, posted 07-05-2020 1:22 PM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1765 of 2370 (878833)
07-05-2020 12:58 PM
Reply to: Message 1763 by ringo
07-05-2020 12:53 PM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible" ...
It is arrogant of you to pretend science knows when being shown unable to demonstrate it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1763 by ringo, posted 07-05-2020 12:53 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1773 by ringo, posted 07-05-2020 7:36 PM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1766 of 2370 (878834)
07-05-2020 12:59 PM
Reply to: Message 1759 by Capt Stormfield
07-05-2020 11:18 AM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible" ...
Not a scientific basis, sorry. Maybe keep playing in the sand or whatever.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1759 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-05-2020 11:18 AM Capt Stormfield has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1771 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-05-2020 7:28 PM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1767 of 2370 (878835)
07-05-2020 1:02 PM
Reply to: Message 1758 by Phat
07-05-2020 10:03 AM


Re: the world that then was
You switch from tree rings to deep space. You seem to be all over the map here. OK, so light is seen here in the area of the solar system only. We do not go out into the universe and see it at source, you realize this much?
Now, we also do not know what time is like out there at all. We do not see time or space. So what time is involved in anything happening out there is absolutely unknown.
You with me so far?
Edited by dad, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1758 by Phat, posted 07-05-2020 10:03 AM Phat has not replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1769 of 2370 (878839)
07-05-2020 2:30 PM
Reply to: Message 1768 by ringo
07-05-2020 1:22 PM


Re: the world that then was
quote:
Now that is a really silly thing to say. Unless we can show that it didn't change, you will assume that it did?
Unless you know and can prove that the nature you use in all models of the past was as you claim, I have no reason to assume it was. None at all. In fact, Scripture and even ancient history to some extent records that it was not the same. So I do not consider it a question, we already have the record. When you claim otherwise I naturally demand real evidence.
quote:
So tomorrow you'll come to EvC assuming that it has changed to the website for Major League baseball?
I think that nature follows certain forces and laws and as long as that nature exists, we can expect those laws to be valid.
However, I also happen to know that one day soon that nature will change again! So I will not be the one hiding under rocks wishing to die when predicted changes occur. ( I hope).
quote:
The pattern of the rings - e.g. wide narrow narrow wide extra-wide, etc. - can be compared from tree to tree.
Let's see a close up of tree rings over 5000 deep? Let's look at that pattern for that time. We wait.
If you pass that bar, we will then ask the question 'have you any reasons that fast growing trees in the different past nature would not have a similar pattern, though the rings represent parts of a month or week or day rather than seasons'?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1768 by ringo, posted 07-05-2020 1:22 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1772 by ringo, posted 07-05-2020 7:33 PM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1774 of 2370 (878849)
07-05-2020 8:21 PM
Reply to: Message 1771 by Capt Stormfield
07-05-2020 7:28 PM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible" ...
It's not up to me to prove your beliefs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1771 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-05-2020 7:28 PM Capt Stormfield has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1778 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-05-2020 8:49 PM dad has not replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1775 of 2370 (878850)
07-05-2020 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 1773 by ringo
07-05-2020 7:36 PM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible" ...
You have comprehension issues if you think Razd's belief based arguments demonstrated anything.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1773 by ringo, posted 07-05-2020 7:36 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1783 by ringo, posted 07-06-2020 9:36 AM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1776 of 2370 (878851)
07-05-2020 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 1772 by ringo
07-05-2020 7:33 PM


Re: the world that then was
No one thinks Scripture is reliable to those who have rejected God.
Razd did not cover how trees grew in the past. By the way I don't see him around..?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1772 by ringo, posted 07-05-2020 7:33 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1782 by ringo, posted 07-06-2020 9:29 AM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1777 of 2370 (878852)
07-05-2020 8:25 PM
Reply to: Message 1770 by AZPaul3
07-05-2020 3:46 PM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible" ...
Because reality involves more than imagination and belief.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1770 by AZPaul3, posted 07-05-2020 3:46 PM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1779 by Capt Stormfield, posted 07-05-2020 8:54 PM dad has not replied
 Message 1780 by AZPaul3, posted 07-06-2020 4:11 AM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1785 of 2370 (878876)
07-06-2020 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 1780 by AZPaul3
07-06-2020 4:11 AM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible" ...
How long do we know it was the same on earth? Certainly the world described in early Sumer seemed different, since they have people living many centuries. They also had spirits living with us in Egyptian records. That would not be natural now.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1780 by AZPaul3, posted 07-06-2020 4:11 AM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1793 by AZPaul3, posted 07-06-2020 7:53 PM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1786 of 2370 (878877)
07-06-2020 1:43 PM
Reply to: Message 1781 by Phat
07-06-2020 8:28 AM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible" ...
quote:
OK, so first off, who is *we*?
We are those living on earth. We choose what we believe generally.
quote:
Science in this context means the collective critical thought process and data analysis of the scientiofic community-at-large correct?
No.
Definition of science
1 : the state of knowing : knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding
Not the state of having hunches beliefs of feelings or assumptions.
You are welcome to your beliefs. Present them as such.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1781 by Phat, posted 07-06-2020 8:28 AM Phat has not replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


(2)
Message 1787 of 2370 (878878)
07-06-2020 1:45 PM
Reply to: Message 1782 by ringo
07-06-2020 9:29 AM


Re: the world that then was
Sorry to hear that, he was a lively debater.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1782 by ringo, posted 07-06-2020 9:29 AM ringo has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1801 by Admin, posted 07-07-2020 10:13 AM dad has not replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1788 of 2370 (878879)
07-06-2020 1:47 PM
Reply to: Message 1783 by ringo
07-06-2020 9:36 AM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible" ...
The main reason that stuff seems unchallenged is because dissent was quashed and opposing opinions.
There is nothing in the thread I could not deal with handily.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1783 by ringo, posted 07-06-2020 9:36 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1790 by Tanypteryx, posted 07-06-2020 2:16 PM dad has replied
 Message 1791 by ringo, posted 07-06-2020 3:29 PM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1789 of 2370 (878880)
07-06-2020 1:48 PM
Reply to: Message 1784 by JonF
07-06-2020 10:37 AM


Re: We don't ASSUME the past was the same
Scripture and ancient historical records of the past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1784 by JonF, posted 07-06-2020 10:37 AM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1792 by JonF, posted 07-06-2020 3:39 PM dad has replied

  
dad
Member (Idle past 1359 days)
Posts: 337
Joined: 05-29-2020


Message 1794 of 2370 (878898)
07-06-2020 10:15 PM
Reply to: Message 1790 by Tanypteryx
07-06-2020 2:16 PM


Re: Just as the fact that there is no "Bible" ...
Then post your best shot from it and watch the action.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1790 by Tanypteryx, posted 07-06-2020 2:16 PM Tanypteryx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024