Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 60 (9209 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Skylink
Post Volume: Total: 919,449 Year: 6,706/9,624 Month: 46/238 Week: 46/22 Day: 1/12 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Should we teach both evolution and religion in school?
Larni
Member (Idle past 106 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 1846 of 2073 (879120)
07-11-2020 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 1843 by Kleinman
07-11-2020 4:37 PM


Re: More history...
You’ve messed the quote up. That’s not me you are quoting.
Easily done.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1843 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 4:37 PM Kleinman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1848 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 5:46 PM Larni has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 588 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 1847 of 2073 (879121)
07-11-2020 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 1845 by AZPaul3
07-11-2020 4:57 PM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
Kleinman writes:
I have enough work on my hands teaching the mathematically incompetent the mathematics of DNA evolution.
AZPaul3 writes:
Run away as fast as you can, Mr. Billion Generations per Mutation.
Do you see what I mean? Generations aren't the random trial for the beneficial mutation, it's replications. Go to the back of the class.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1845 by AZPaul3, posted 07-11-2020 4:57 PM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1850 by AZPaul3, posted 07-11-2020 6:09 PM Kleinman has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 588 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 1848 of 2073 (879122)
07-11-2020 5:46 PM
Reply to: Message 1846 by Larni
07-11-2020 5:41 PM


Re: More history...
Larni writes:
You’ve messed the quote up. That’s not me you are quoting.
Easily done.
So you mean someone else by the name of Larni posted that quote?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1846 by Larni, posted 07-11-2020 5:41 PM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1860 by Larni, posted 07-12-2020 10:34 AM Kleinman has not replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 588 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 1849 of 2073 (879123)
07-11-2020 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 1844 by Straggler
07-11-2020 4:45 PM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
Kleinman writes:
That's not my job.
Straggler writes:
The evolution you have mathematically modelled is a blinkered small minded form of evolution that tells us nothing about the origin of species. It’s of pactical interest to medics and immunologists but of little worth beyond that.
So tell us, big thinker, what were the mechanisms of evolution that Darwin wrote about in his book "On the Origin of Species"?
Straggler writes:
It’s hardly a replacement for the grand overarching underpinning of all biology that started with Darwin and which has extended to phylogenetics today.
I doubt you understand what Darwin wrote about. But feel free to post a quote from his book which you think encompasses what he was trying to say. If you have trouble doing that, I can help you. And you can't do DNA phylogenetics based on fossil tea-leaf reading and you can't do DNA phylogenetics by cherry-picking a portion of the genome.
Straggler writes:
You say you have successfully provided thr mathematics to evolution. But if it’s not any sort of evolution that matters outside the narrow confines of one or two specific special case experiments, if it has no bearing on the origin lf species, then you aren’t the Newton you think you are.
And when are you going to present a real, measurable, and repeatable example of evolution that doesn't follow the mathematics I've presented? You won't. And Newton had to invent calculus to do the mathematics for his physical model. Probability theory was already a well developed mathematical discipline that I simply applied to DNA evolution. You should study the subject if you want to understand evolution.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1844 by Straggler, posted 07-11-2020 4:45 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1855 by Straggler, posted 07-12-2020 5:29 AM Kleinman has replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8654
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 6.8


Message 1850 of 2073 (879124)
07-11-2020 6:09 PM
Reply to: Message 1847 by Kleinman
07-11-2020 5:43 PM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
Your billion-generations-per-mutation math proves without a shadow of a doubt that evolution is impossible. So what takes its place? Where did this all come from?
Still afraid to answer the question?

Factio Republicana delenda est.
I am antifa.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1847 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 5:43 PM Kleinman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1851 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 6:26 PM AZPaul3 has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 588 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 1851 of 2073 (879125)
07-11-2020 6:26 PM
Reply to: Message 1850 by AZPaul3
07-11-2020 6:09 PM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
AZPaul3 writes:
Your billion-generations-per-mutation math proves without a shadow of a doubt that evolution is impossible. So what takes its place? Where did this all come from?
Still afraid to answer the question?
No silly. That billion-replications-per-beneficial mutation explains how evolution works. And if you really want to know where it all came from, ask your fossil tea-leaf reader. Just don't expect them to tell you the correct explanation of how evolution works.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1850 by AZPaul3, posted 07-11-2020 6:09 PM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1854 by AZPaul3, posted 07-11-2020 11:09 PM Kleinman has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 664 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1852 of 2073 (879126)
07-11-2020 9:20 PM
Reply to: Message 1834 by Kleinman
07-11-2020 9:38 AM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
Kleinman writes:
ringo writes:
When the students don't learn it's often the teacher's fault.
And you know this because....
It's just a general observation. It's a poor workman who blames his tools and a poor teacher who blames his students. Instead of telling us how stupid we are, maybe check for a beam in your own eye and adjust your teaching methods. That is, if you're really sincere about wanting people to learn your lesson.

"I've been to Moose Jaw, now I can die." -- John Wing

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1834 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 9:38 AM Kleinman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1853 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 10:36 PM ringo has replied
 Message 1865 by Kleinman, posted 07-12-2020 3:23 PM ringo has replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 588 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 1853 of 2073 (879128)
07-11-2020 10:36 PM
Reply to: Message 1852 by ringo
07-11-2020 9:20 PM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
ringo writes:
When the students don't learn it's often the teacher's fault.
Kleinman writes:
And you know this because....
ringo writes:
It's just a general observation. It's a poor workman who blames his tools and a poor teacher who blames his students. Instead of telling us how stupid we are, maybe check for a beam in your own eye and adjust your teaching methods. That is, if you're really sincere about wanting people to learn your lesson.
You should read and quote the entire sentence and then you might learn something. And the reason you are so stupid is that you are lazy, you don't read the book, and you don't do your homework. So don't blame me for your failure to understand the physics and mathematics of evolution. Blame yourself. And it always amuses me when atheists quote their favorite and only verse they know from the Bible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1852 by ringo, posted 07-11-2020 9:20 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1858 by ringo, posted 07-12-2020 9:45 AM Kleinman has replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8654
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 6.8


Message 1854 of 2073 (879129)
07-11-2020 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 1851 by Kleinman
07-11-2020 6:26 PM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
We fish-to-man aficionados blame common descent thru evolution for this affair. The fossil-tea leaf readers say fish-to-man.
You say your billion-generations-per-mutation is indeed the way evolution works. But you also say your billion-generations-per-mutation makes common descent thru evolution impossible.
So the gospel according to Kleinman is that common descent does not happen and fish-to-man did not happen.
So in the gospel according to Kleinman what did happen?

Factio Republicana delenda est.
I am antifa.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1851 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 6:26 PM Kleinman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1856 by Kleinman, posted 07-12-2020 5:48 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 318 days)
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 1855 of 2073 (879136)
07-12-2020 5:29 AM
Reply to: Message 1849 by Kleinman
07-11-2020 6:04 PM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
So you want to replace evolution as the mechanism by which species originate with....what?
The evolution you have modelled can account for nothing more than some minor changes relating to drug resistance and suchlike. It barely qualifies as evolution as most people understand it.
Do we even need to go as far as species origin - Is your model even consistent with recently evolved Human traits? What does your model say about the probability of adaptations for living in high altitudes? The probability of developing resistance to contagious diseases (such as malaria)? Fair skin, blue eyes, lactase persistence or alcohol tolerance?
These are all known recent developments. According to your model what is the probability of these having evolved?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1849 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 6:04 PM Kleinman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1857 by Kleinman, posted 07-12-2020 6:38 AM Straggler has replied
 Message 1864 by dad, posted 07-12-2020 2:45 PM Straggler has not replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 588 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 1856 of 2073 (879137)
07-12-2020 5:48 AM
Reply to: Message 1854 by AZPaul3
07-11-2020 11:09 PM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
AZPaul3 writes:
We fish-to-man aficionados blame common descent thru evolution for this affair. The fossil-tea leaf readers say fish-to-man.
You say your billion-generations-per-mutation is indeed the way evolution works. But you also say your billion-generations-per-mutation makes common descent thru evolution impossible.
So the gospel according to Kleinman is that common descent does not happen and fish-to-man did not happen.
So in the gospel according to Kleinman what did happen?
What the Kishony and Lenski experiments demonstrate is how DNA evolution by common descent works. And each evolutionary step takes a billion replications. You fish-to-man aficionados need to learn the difference between generations and replications. The reason this distinction is so important is that if you want to understand a stochastic process, the first thing you need to recognize is what the random trial is for that stochastic process. For example, if you are considering a card drawing problem, the random trial is not the deck of cards, the random trial is the draw of the card. Populations can have all different kinds of growth each generation. The number of replications each generation can be constant, exponentially growing, growing at a linear rate, declining... But the replication will always be the random trial for the beneficial mutation. And I would say having a correct understanding of evolution is good news. It gives you the correct framework for developing strategies to prevent drug-resistant infections and more durable cancer treatments.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1854 by AZPaul3, posted 07-11-2020 11:09 PM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
Kleinman
Member (Idle past 588 days)
Posts: 2142
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2016


Message 1857 of 2073 (879138)
07-12-2020 6:38 AM
Reply to: Message 1855 by Straggler
07-12-2020 5:29 AM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
Straggler writes:
So you want to replace evolution as the mechanism by which species originate with....what?
I think you don't have any idea what Darwin was talking about. Here's what Darwin said from his work on the origin of species:
Darwin writes:
For it should be remembered that the competition will generally be most severe between those forms which are most nearly related to each other in habits, constitution and structure. Hence all the intermediate forms between the earlier and later states, that is between the less and more improved state of a species, as well as the original parent-species itself, will generally tend to become extinct. So it probably will be with many whole collateral lines of descent, which will be conquered by later and improved lines of descent. If, however, the modified offspring of a species get into some distinct country, or become quickly adapted to some quite new station, in which child and parent do not come into competition, both may continue to exist.
Darwin is talking about two distinct physical processes, competition, and adaptation. You probably don't even know that competition slows adaptation.
Straggler writes:
The evolution you have modelled can account for nothing more than some minor changes relating to drug resistance and suchlike. It barely qualifies as "evolution" as most people understand it.
What understanding of evolution do you have? These are real, measurable, and repeatable examples of Darwinian evolution, the Lenski experiment is an example of adaptation in a highly competitive environment and the Kishony experiment is an example of adaptation in a minimally competitive environment. Whatever your understanding of evolution is based on something from your imagination, not on real examples of evolution.
Straggler writes:
Do we even need to go as far as species origin - Is your model even consistent with recently evolved Human traits? What does your model say about the probability of adaptations for living in high altitudes? The probability of developing resistance to contagious diseases (such as malaria)? Fair skin, blue eyes, lactase persistence or alcohol tolerance?
Our bodies will produce more red blood cells if we live in lower oxygen concentration environments. And malaria resistance such as sickle cell trait, thalassemia, etc are examples of single point mutations and humans have had more than enough replications for those events to occur. Remember, with a billion replications and a mutation rate of e-9, you will have on average every possible base substitution in some member of that population. And there have been about 100 billion people who have lived. The problem that you don't seem to get is getting malaria resistance, fair skin, blue eyes, lactase persistence, alcohol tolerance... all into one lineage. The accumulation of those mutations requires a billion replications of each variant at each evolutionary step. With 100 billion replications to work with, the best you can come up with is 100 adaptive mutations in some lineage.
Straggler writes:
These are all known recent developments. According to your model what is the probability of these having evolved?
It is like it is for the Kishony experiment. In his initial colony of a billion members, he is going to have a variant with a ciprofloxacin beneficial mutation and a trimethoprim beneficial mutation (and likely to many other antibiotics). The particular antibiotic used reveals which of these mutations are beneficial. The problem for his bacteria when two drugs are used requires exponentially more replication for the two beneficial mutations to occur on a single individual.
Here's how you do the math for this evolutionary process:
The mathematics of random mutation and natural selection for multiple simultaneous selection pressures and the evolution of antimicrobial drug resistance

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1855 by Straggler, posted 07-12-2020 5:29 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1863 by Straggler, posted 07-12-2020 2:39 PM Kleinman has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 664 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 1858 of 2073 (879140)
07-12-2020 9:45 AM
Reply to: Message 1853 by Kleinman
07-11-2020 10:36 PM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
Kleinman writes:
... the reason you are so stupid is that you are lazy, you don't read the book, and you don't do your homework.
As I said, it's a poor teacher who blames his students.
Kleinman writes:
And it always amuses me when atheists quote their favorite and only verse they know from the Bible.
I was practically born in church and I could literally quote Bible verses before I could read them.
We have a lot of Bible-related topics. Feel free to show us how much you know over there.

"I've been to Moose Jaw, now I can die." -- John Wing

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1853 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 10:36 PM Kleinman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1859 by jar, posted 07-12-2020 9:54 AM ringo has seen this message but not replied
 Message 1861 by Kleinman, posted 07-12-2020 1:47 PM ringo has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 92 days)
Posts: 34140
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 1859 of 2073 (879141)
07-12-2020 9:54 AM
Reply to: Message 1858 by ringo
07-12-2020 9:45 AM


Re: If We Throw The ToE Away, What Will Replace It?
And it always amuses me when Christians, particularly "Biblical Christians" claim that they have read the Bible or are even capable of reading the Bible.

My Sister's Website: Rose Hill StudiosMy Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1858 by ringo, posted 07-12-2020 9:45 AM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 106 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 1860 of 2073 (879143)
07-12-2020 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 1848 by Kleinman
07-11-2020 5:46 PM


Re: More history...
quote:
So you mean someone else by the name of Larni posted that quote?
Incorrect. The renowned and respected dwise1 posted what you claim I posted.
To clarify: I was replying to his post about Dr Adequate. I quoted him in my post and then you attributed that to me (for reasons unknown).
Like I said, easily done and not a problem.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1848 by Kleinman, posted 07-11-2020 5:46 PM Kleinman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024