|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1656 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Trilobites, Mountains and Marine Deposits - Evidence of a flood? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 419 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Trilobites of the Burgess Shale, Canada quote: Four samples are shown.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1656 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
THE POINT IS that if the different species of trilobites are found at large distances from each other that would fit with the Flood scenario. You can't make up reality Faith. Different species of trilobites are found in the same digs, but at different elevations.
quote: It only took a simple google search to find this information, and this was the top of the list.
quote: And there is a lot more to the fauna and flora found in the layers with trilobites, all showing mature marine ecosystems functioning for multiple generations. Enjoyby our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edge Member (Idle past 1957 days) Posts: 4696 From: Colorado, USA Joined: |
Actually, no, that has NOT been shown.
I have no idea what you are trying to say here. Both Olenellus and Glossopleura are found in the same area (the GC, for instance), but are never found in the same layer, with Olenellus always being lower.
The Time Scale illustrations make them look to be in close proximity but that is just an illusion.
Again, I have no idea what you are trying to say. Jon was discussing the map location of trilobite fossils. The relative age is always the same with Olenellus in older sediments. Just because they are close in two dimensions does not mean that they are of the same age.
You need to supply the information of where the fossils of each species have been found.
In a relative age sense, you have been told. One is older than the other.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1696 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Different species of trilobites are found in the same digs, but at different elevations All I wanted to know was how far from each other they are horizontally. Being at different elevations could mean one group directly above another group or it could mean at a different elevation but half a mile away horizontally -- or fifty feet or whatever.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1696 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I have no idea what you are trying to say here. Both Olenellus and Glossopleura are found in the same area (the GC, for instance), but are never found in the same layer, with Olenellus always being lower But as I just posted to RAZD, how often are they found directly above or below each other as versus some distance away horizontally? Also although the same species is found in the same layer, how often are they found close together in their group versus scattered in the layer? Edited by Faith, : No reason given. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
edge Member (Idle past 1957 days) Posts: 4696 From: Colorado, USA Joined:
|
But as I just posted to RAZD, how often are they found directly above or below each other as versus some distance away horizontally?
I'm not sure what difference it makes. We are talking about the Bright Angel Shale in the Grand Canyon. I have no idea if they are stacked exactly in a vertical column. The section is what it is.
Also although the same species is found in the same layer, how often are they found close together in their group versus scattered in the layer?
Again, sounds irrelevant. I imagine both situations are common, but usually fossils are found in abundance near other fossils of the same kind. That's why fossil quarries are isolated occurrences. Not every part of a formation is productive. Why do I get the impression you are on a hunting expedition?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1656 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
All I wanted to know was how far from each other they are horizontally. Being at different elevations could mean one group directly above another group or it could mean at a different elevation but half a mile away horizontally -- or fifty feet or whatever. Irrelevant. Enjoyby our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressie Member (Idle past 227 days) Posts: 2103 From: Pretoria, SA Joined: |
RAZD, Faith is convinced that the Devonian is a rock layer. You might as well try to have a rational conversation with a wall.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Juvenissun Member (Idle past 1559 days) Posts: 332 Joined: |
Conclusion: the evidence cannot be due to water covering these locations for only a few hundred days, and therefor it is de facto NOT evidence of any Noachin like flood event, but of something that occurred on a geological time scale. I guess you are right. The fossil sequence has hard time to be an evidence of the global flood. However, one feature failed to be an evidence of something does NOT mean something did not happen.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024