Did the Flood really happen?

great show me where.

I give you evidence, a very very strong evidence. However, you may not understand the evidence.The evidence is: the earth has vast amount of ocean water in contrast to the mass of land.Can you "reason" on my evidence? I don't believe you can.

Because I want to emphasize that the global flood is not a flood as we understand it. It is a feature beyond the definition by a normal flood. So, we can NOT directly compare normal flood products with the consequence of the global flood. For example, a global continuous depositional layer.

Any one of my post.

Are you the 'dad' who posts on ChristianForums?

The possible reason why that portion of the earth flooded and drowned so many people, is not just because of rain but most like the moon went out of its normal orbit , came much closer to earth and gravity pulled the earth oceans to that part of the globe. The reason for the moon going out of it's normal orbit was probably the impact of an asteroid.

Are you talking about the global flood described in the Bible, or just a large (not likely global) flood?A meteorite strike happened in the ocean can also cause a huge flood. People think it happened a number of time in the past.

No.

Or, by far the most likely, Noah's Flood (actually Utnapishtim's Flood, which was borrowed into Judean lore) is just a story, a mythic story. At best, there may have been a flood that was much worse than usual (AKA "hundred-year flood" or "500-year flood") and in the telling and retelling of that story it grow all out of proportion as is typical of the evolution of a legend. Trump illustrates that when he would repeat a false claim involving a number (usually of people) and in each subsequent retelling of that claim that number would grow almost exponentially until what started out as a few thousand ends up becoming millions.Trying to explain how a story could actually happen is at the same level as on Big Bang Theory when the girls read a Thor comic book and then get into a very heated argument over how someone unworthy would be able to pick up his hammer, Mjlnir -- if Thor is holding it and you pick Thor up, like an elevator which is not worthy.It's a story. Enjoy it as such. Especially when what the story has to offer has nothing to do with whether it's literally true.Another example would be the story of the frog and the scorpion which has recently reappeared several times. The point of the story is just as valid even though such a negotiation between an amphibian and an arachnid can be deemed impossible.Insisting that a story must be literally true in order for it to have any value makes absolutely no sense. Especially for creationists who insist that if that story is not literally true then their religion is false and should be rejected.

And, Juve, I don’t believe that you have reasoned on your evidence
either. Not even a little bit.

I don't see any science in your opinion.

I reason all the time, all my life. That is my profession.
If you reason, I reason back. If you don't, I may or may not reason. Edited by Juvenissun, : No reason given.

And we still have not seen any science in your "opinion" about Noah.BTW, having an opinion requires having thought about the matter. You might want to try that some time. Could prove to be a very refreshing change.

Maybe not. But what I ask floodists is: How do you distinguish one big flood from lots of little floods? The evidence that we have is all we have to go on, so how does that evidence point to one big flood? Why not?According to the Bible, the flood waters rose for a while, during which there would have been erosion; then the waters were stable for a while, during which there would have been deposition; then the waters receded, during which there would have been erosion and deposition. It seems quite likely to me that there would be at least one distinct layer that would be, if not on 100% of the earth's surface, at least a very large part of it.

so you're just gonna out right lie. unsurprising.