Did the Flood really happen?

Why?

You won't agree with me anyway. Why bother?
Show your sincerity in the discussion.

1. From Adams age to the age of Abraham, roughly 900 to 200.
2. Do you see the decrease of age in the above?
3. That is a good question. We do not know. But we can certainly try some time periods to examine the model.The rest of what you said is real junky. Sad.

I don't know the equations for the calculation. But I do believe the fly-by will have some effect to the orbit of the earth. A few years ago, even the earthquake which caused tsunami in Indian Ocean affect the orbit.I would assume an asteroid of the moon size, fly-by the earth 50 km above the earth. I guess the method of calculation should be the same. Edited by Juvenissun, : No reason given.

Sorry, no answer to your question.
Both Noah and the Flood do not exist.
That is fine.

Assume Adam can live 120 years, which is the same as a normal person could today (happy with this assumption?). That is 120 circles around the sun. In the same period of time, the earth at Adam's time made 950 circles. Could you figure out how faster (than today) should the earth circulate at Adam's time?I guess this would be a good math question for school kids. Edited by Juvenissun, : No reason given.

Sorry, nice story. But it is irrelevant to the longevity issue.

So, the earth spin faster 400 m.y. ago. Could we say the earth at that time also has shorter year? I am not sure where was the moon in Silurian time. But what would be the situation in Precambrian time? How would this info related to the length of a year?

OK, my mistake. It affected the self rotation, but not the orbit.
Thanks. Forget this argument.

Hey, jar, this is the science forum, and the topic is the global flood.According to you, the Flood never exist. Are you saying all people who made thousands of posts to argue about the Flood are utterly stupid?

If so, don't talk about the age of Noah. That is perfectly fine with me.

I would eagerly agree and say: please do that.Then the ball is in your field. Understand?

You are very welcome.
I guess that is one of the major purpose for me to talk in here. Wasteful on time or not is another deep question.

See, here is the trick I can easily catch.
I did not say that.What I said is toward "that particular case". And even that, it is because nobody reported the orbit change after that incident. However, because nobody measured it, we are not sure that nothing about the orbit was changed.

The question is: It is a question asked for TIME. The format should be
T(old) = f T (now)And your calculation gives an answer of distance. Appreciate your effort. But do you see where went wrong?