Miracle Of The Sun & Other Musings

Truth is a human construct that is only relevant within a particular mutually agreed social compact and that varies over time, specific instances and related mythos.

I know that you use that word ...You really are totally clueless what the word "evidence" means it seems.And yes, it is very true that like the child at the parade I do not see the Emperor's new clothes.

It would never be evidence of a miracle no matter how many alleged instances there were.Learn the basics.Learn what evidence is.

More utter nonsense from you Phat.Stop and think. Reread what I quoted from your post and underline the really stupid parts.

Actually, science did check out the Shroud of Turin but even if it was not a fraud it would not be evidence that Jesus even existed or evidence of a miracle.Learn the basics. See if you can find where you left your brain.

You keep trying to market a disgusting pathetic picayune psycopath of a god that is totally unworthy of any respect.

Come on, if you are gonna quote quote it all. The lord you market is a disgusting pathetic picayune psycopath of a god that is totally unworthy of any respect.AbE:And yes, marketing Christ Crucified simply demeans and denigrates Jesus and makes his whole message totally worthless.It is disgusting that you pervert Jesus to such an extent. Edited by jar, : see AbE

I see. Like I said, you love to denigrate Jesus and totally throw his teaching away. What you market is deplorable.

Phat, Phat, Phat.Please stop lying.Really.Why do you constantly misrepresent and lie about what I post?

Think Phat, for once actually try to think.Which of the things you quoted support your lie that "jar markets a God whom was and is essentially created by human wisdom."?Why must you always lie Phat?Then if you can, point out the new examples of you lying in your recent post that is quoted above.Edited by jar, : fix sub-title.

You are still lying Phat.Show me where I market a God at all?It is not me who markets GOD or God or god but you and the Apologists. And I support that assertion and have consistently supported that assertion by simply pointing out what YOU and the Apologists and the authors of the Bible actually have written.I believe you do not knowingly lie but only because you refuse to actually think about or even read what you write.I don't enjoy having to constantly and repeatedly point out your actions and behavior but decades of discussion with you has shown you simply are not capable of even seeing your own behavior.Then, the reaction from you is consistently to simply avoid addressing the questions asked of you.Which of the things you quoted support your lie that "jar markets a God whom was and is essentially created by human wisdom."?Of the specifics I was responding to ... ... can you even see the new examples of you lying in what is quoted above?

Sorta kinda not exactly.Peter likely knew Jesus directly and Peter was the head of the Church in Rome. Paul though had far more influence in creating "Christianity" and Paul never knew or met or even knew much about Jesus.

Actually in many instances it is quite clear who owns a church and who has the right to sell it. For example my church and the property is owned by the Diocese and the Bishop of the Diocese can sell it.

Back into the Diocese coffers.

Actually the finances are pretty much open and clear. The Diocese owns church property including any structures on the property. Most of the established Christian Sects do have pretty good financial controls and in fact the point you are making about the Roman Catholic Church hiding assets is a good example to support such control. In the major sects it is far harder to transfer monies into individuals pockets.