why it is so odious to handcuff your prisoner to a gurney, whether he is paralyzed or not. Three times is a charm... lets have, mate.
If it has to be explained why handcuffing people is odious in a free society (as opposed to the police state you seem to favour heading towards), then there is little hope for you.
Sometimes handcuffing is a proportionate and sensible thing to do - even though it is odious - but in every circumstance in which the police have to take that decision, it’s about balancing the rights of the individual they’re arresting (and do let’s remember, that individual is innocent until proven guilty) against any dangers they may represent. That would be why it’s horrendous to have cuffed Jacob Blake to his gurney. A man (and again, let’s remember that an individual is innocent until proven guilty) who has been shot seven times in the back poses as much danger to the public as a kitten. You don’t cuff him, because it’s not a nice thing to do to someone, and the circumstances here don’t justify it. Balance Hyro - it’s all about balance. The police owe duties to those they arrest too, and have to balance them with their other duties.
Could there be any greater conceit, than for someone to believe that the universe has to be simple enough for them to be able to understand it ?