Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9042 total)
50 online now:
PaulK (1 member, 49 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Post Volume: Total: 886,007 Year: 3,653/14,102 Month: 273/321 Week: 89/44 Day: 5/26 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   2020 Election early voting and eventually results
PaulK
Member
Posts: 16881
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 194 of 200 (883868)
01-16-2021 9:38 AM
Reply to: Message 191 by Sarah Bellum
01-12-2021 7:37 PM


quote:
Most people, in my experience, like to think of themselves as centrists ("Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right, ...")

Then maybe that’s your problem. You are much further to the Right than you like to think.

quote:
But anyway, the idea of trying to fix a political makeup of the court falls apart when you realize that justices aren't supposed to rule on the basis of their political views, as you've conceded by ridiculing the idea that a white supremacist or global warming denier justice would be justified by public opinion.

This is foolish again. Judges are not supposed to rule according to silly dogmas associated with ideologies, but that is hardly the limit of politics. There is the whole question of judicial philosophises, for a start. Not to mention biases based in political standpoints.

It seems to me that the Supreme Court of all courts is badly in need of checks on judge’s bias - and especially when judges do let their political views colour their decisions.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by Sarah Bellum, posted 01-12-2021 7:37 PM Sarah Bellum has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by AZPaul3, posted 01-16-2021 1:16 PM PaulK has not yet responded
 Message 197 by Sarah Bellum, posted 01-21-2021 6:30 PM PaulK has responded

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 16881
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 200 of 200 (884083)
01-22-2021 12:26 AM
Reply to: Message 197 by Sarah Bellum
01-21-2021 6:30 PM


quote:
I agree that there should be checks. That is, the legislators should actually pass well-written laws (and take the heat from their constituents if the laws are unpopular) rather than pound the lectern and demand that "correct" judges and justices be appointed so that policy ends up being made by court decisions (which the legislators won't take as much heat for).

Then obviously you agree with me that a campaign to politically bias the courts should be reversed.

quote:
As for your snarky remark about me being further to the right than "you like to think", what gives you that notion, aside from your own wishful thinking?

The fact that you keep trying to suggest that balance is not a centrist position?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by Sarah Bellum, posted 01-21-2021 6:30 PM Sarah Bellum has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021