Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 61 (9042 total)
61 online now:
vimesey (1 member, 60 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Post Volume: Total: 885,972 Year: 3,618/14,102 Month: 238/321 Week: 54/44 Day: 5/9 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Anti-theist
Sarah Bellum
Member
Posts: 738
Joined: 05-04-2019


Message 241 of 465 (885287)
04-01-2021 6:36 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by AZPaul3
01-14-2021 2:14 PM


The anti-theist case has been made in many ways. Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged attacks the "mystics of spirit" and Christopher Hitchens' God Is Not Great discusses almost every individual version of religion invented by humans.

But the most basic principle, in my opinion, is that good people will do good things and evil people do evil things, but in order to persuade good people to do evil things faith is needed to drive them.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by AZPaul3, posted 01-14-2021 2:14 PM AZPaul3 has not yet responded

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5838
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 242 of 465 (885302)
04-04-2021 2:58 AM


Smart Folk Do Err
Welcome to our Sundae Service, Brothers and Sisters.

Healthy discussion is fostered by different points of view. We need do no less.

Dr. George Ellis is one of the most prominent cosmologists in the discipline. He co-authored books with Stephen Hawking. The smart just drips out of the video. Ten minutes of wonderful cosmology well worth the listen.

Then …

… the ending is a bother. Big time.

How physical causality within the universe is not exclusive he doesn’t explain. And how he leaps from the supposition of these other causalities to a “something that intended it to be that way” is interesting. Wrong, but interesting.

To hear that part you have to get to the end first. Don't skip ahead or you'll miss out on all the good cosmology stuff.

Philosophy of Cosmology | Closer to Truth


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

Replies to this message:
 Message 243 by nwr, posted 04-04-2021 11:12 AM AZPaul3 has not yet responded
 Message 244 by Phat, posted 04-04-2021 11:14 AM AZPaul3 has not yet responded

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 5726
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.8


(1)
Message 243 of 465 (885304)
04-04-2021 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 242 by AZPaul3
04-04-2021 2:58 AM


Re: Smart Folk Do Err
Then …

… the ending is a bother. Big time.


It didn't bother me. But then I take most cosmology as speculative.

He seems to be attempting to answer the question "Why is there something, rather than nothing." And we should all know that there will never be an answer for this question.


Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by AZPaul3, posted 04-04-2021 2:58 AM AZPaul3 has not yet responded

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 15457
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 244 of 465 (885305)
04-04-2021 11:14 AM
Reply to: Message 242 by AZPaul3
04-04-2021 2:58 AM


Re: Smart Folk Do Err
How physical causality within the universe is not exclusive he doesn’t explain. And how he leaps from the supposition of these other causalities to a “something that intended it to be that way” is interesting. Wrong, but interesting.

To hear that part you have to get to the end first. Don't skip ahead or you'll miss out on all the good cosmology stuff.

I like his thought process...as far as I can understand it. I also like that he does not favor the multiverse theory. I have always maintained that even in an infinite array of potential multiverses, there would still only be One God. Just my belief...but I will say this, AZ.
You have no basis to declare his "something" as WRONG. It is one of the five possible options. A ten year old budding anti-thesit can push it out of his mind, but he cant push it out of the realm of possibility. And God can make His home in the imaginations of smart folks as well as authoritarian simpletons.

"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain "
***
“…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”- Dr.John Lennox

“The whole war between the atheist and the theist comes down to this: the atheist believes a 'what' created the universe; the theist believes a 'who' created the universe.”
- Criss Jami, Killo

“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” — Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You
(1894).


This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by AZPaul3, posted 04-04-2021 2:58 AM AZPaul3 has not yet responded

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5838
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.5


(2)
Message 245 of 465 (885314)
04-04-2021 4:21 PM


Today is Easter Sundae for most of the christian world.

So as I understand it if Jesus comes out of his tomb and sees his shadow we have another year of guilt to go through.

Has anyone heard what happened this morning? Do we get more guilt or, after 2000 years, is it over?


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

Replies to this message:
 Message 246 by Phat, posted 04-05-2021 1:53 AM AZPaul3 has not yet responded

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 15457
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 246 of 465 (885315)
04-05-2021 1:53 AM
Reply to: Message 245 by AZPaul3
04-04-2021 4:21 PM


Its A Catholic Thing
Guilt is a Catholic thing. Protestants feel "Blessed", Highly Favored" and occasionally boast about being a "peculiar people".

"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain "
***
“…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”- Dr.John Lennox

“The whole war between the atheist and the theist comes down to this: the atheist believes a 'what' created the universe; the theist believes a 'who' created the universe.”
- Criss Jami, Killo

“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” — Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You
(1894).


This message is a reply to:
 Message 245 by AZPaul3, posted 04-04-2021 4:21 PM AZPaul3 has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 247 by jar, posted 04-05-2021 7:28 AM Phat has acknowledged this reply

  
jar
Member
Posts: 33343
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 3.1


Message 247 of 465 (885316)
04-05-2021 7:28 AM
Reply to: Message 246 by Phat
04-05-2021 1:53 AM


Re: Its A Catholic Thing
Phat writes:

Guilt is a Catholic thing. Protestants feel "Blessed", Highly Favored" and occasionally boast about being a "peculiar people".

Once again Phat, you are simply showing your ********* about Christianity.

Guilt is an HONESTY thing rather than a Catholic thing.

It is only those Christian Cults that are totally divorced from reality that feel "Blessed", Highly Favored" and occasionally boast about being a "peculiar people".


My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 246 by Phat, posted 04-05-2021 1:53 AM Phat has acknowledged this reply

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5838
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.5


(1)
Message 248 of 465 (885338)
04-05-2021 5:25 PM


Smart Folk Do Err
On Sunday’s vid with Dr. George Ellis.

We’re talking unfalsifiable speculations on the fine tuning for life in this universe.

There is a reason the cosmologic constants of the universe are as they are. We just don’t know what that reason is.

Dr. Ellis groups the many various speculative theories under these 4 reason categories.

Pure happenstance
Inevitability
High probability among multi-worlds
Designer, Intent.

Why did he make this last one? It doesn’t seem to be of the same logical class as the other three. To me it is cultural not cosmologic. If it wasn’t for religion in human culture the meme from which he created this one would not have existed. Seems more of a personal religious category than a universal cosmologic one. There is no reason for designer/intent to be on that list at all. But if you’re an active believing Quaker you can do that with your cosmology. I think he may be trying to find ways to justify his god’s claim to the universe.

But since it is there … designer/intent is supposed to be a category of possible unfalsifiable speculations for why the cosmologic constants are as they are. And designer/intent is just one of three such categories chuck full of possible unfalsifiable speculations for why the constants are what they are. Convoluted enough?

Anyway, no, cosmology is not making room for gods. Speculations are not actualities.

It may take a thousand years but we will figure out why the constants are as they are and I am assured, by several of my secret powers, it won’t be anything from the designer/intent category.

It won’t be gods. It’s never gods. Gods are kinda like aliens but fake.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5838
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.5


(1)
Message 249 of 465 (885395)
04-11-2021 2:29 AM


Sundae Service Sermon
Welcome all to our Sundae Sermon where we not so much sermon as babble.

Today’s babble is courtesy of our long suffering Christian friend, Phat.

Blame him. He started this. See Message 69 (nice)

Bible Basher

All he does is trivialities.

Defending trivialities. Bible de-thumpers using trivialities to attack. Neither addresses the problems reality presents for the evil of the bible. Trivialities don’t matter. The overall theme, the evil of the Abrahamic tribal war god, the evil that subsumes every book in the tome, should be the subject, well beyond the trivialities of syntax and minor error.

The conclusion your apologist arrives at is that the bible is god’s word because some of the book's boo-boo’s are, he declares, resolved. How blind. Resolve all the little dates and names you want. The problem of its evil remains.

10 Quick reasons you shouldn’t be so quick to write off Christianity

1. Christianity far from being a crutch for the weak grew and continues to spread during times of intense persecution.

Humans in trouble are likely, if the basis of belief is within them, to seek comfort from their misery in their acculturated religion. Your bible thumper gives a couple numbers that I cannot verify.

Regardless, he neglects to recognize that the same motivation to escape life’s hardships happens in every culture with every religion. Christianity is nothing special in this regard. People who are weak in the recognition of reality will gravitate to religion in times of stress. It’s a human thing – not a Christian thing. And most humans are not Christian.

2. Jesus is the most influential person in history.

No. He wasn’t. The political power of the European church made the cultural references to Jesus ubiquitous. If some temporal category change is the evidence then it is the Roman Catholic Church, 500 years into their reign, which influenced the calendar, not your Jesus. And they lied about the reasoning they chose. Dionysius Exiguus - Wikipedia had no details of Jesus’ birth and faked the timeline. So much for divine inspiration and influence.

3 & 4 are classical creationism which was debunked over 100 years ago. No one should be surprised at the thumpers clinging to debunked false claims.

5. The universe had a beginning.

The Kalamata Cosmological Olive Principle.

To say everything that exists has to have had a cause is fine given the evidence reality has shown us. That would include any gods.

Religionists want to exempt their gods from this requirement. That may be allowed in an article of faith but it is not allowed in the halls of logic. Articles of faith have no force on the reality of logic and the exemption of gods to this rule is illogical, false and rejected.

If you invoke the olive principle then if your gods exist they had a cause. Which would mean it is not the ultimate power and is inferior to another. If you insist that your gods did not have a cause then, in accordance with the olive argument they do not exist.

The only thing we know for certain is that the universe exists. The universe had, apparently, what we have called a beginning in the big bang because we do not have any evidence (or reasonable explanation) of what would have preceded this period. The logic of reality tells us there had to have been something prior (if we define time to allow for a prior and if this logic treatment holds inside this unknown realm) but with present knowledge we are unable to say what that something prior was or even if such a thing existed at all. We do not know.

To jump from that extreme level of ignorance to, not just *therefore god* but therefore to the Christian branded offshoot of a god, is the usual illogic of superstitious stupidity - religion.

Further still, if your gods are not caused then whatever reasons you use to justify this applies equally well to the entire universe. If your god needs no causation then neither does the universe.

6. Historical evidence for Jesus’ resurrection.

Myths embedded in a book of myths should be no surprise. Unlike the thumper’s insistence there is no reliable independent evidence this myth is any more or less fairy tale than the rest of the tome. Also, all the science says this course of events is not possible for a complex biological organism that is dead. Invoking majik is not historical. It’s charlatanism.

7. The existence of objective moral values.

The arguments presented are juvenile. Objective morality is not known to exist. All of human history shows the differences in morality to include every depravity, evil, love and compassion humans can do at each other. Even the most basic of moralities we as humans practice (empathy, compassion, etc.), born of the social mores learned from the evolution of our social species, are subjective. Subject to change from social pressures. We know this. We have seen this. Objective morality does not exist. This is objective fact.

8. The fact mercy is at the heart of Christianity.

What bullshit. Christianity is one of the most destructive, blood-letting, murderous, death-cults ever unleashed on the world. We have the history. We have seen its fruits. Christianity is far from merciful. It is known evil.

9. Christianity provides a framework from which science can be practiced.

Again, bullshit. Science is still struggling to get out from under religious restrictions on major areas of research and discovery. Religion in general, Christianity in particular, have a long history of science repression. This fool is blind to this reality and his argument is apparently meant to convince the believing choir not the knowledgeable layman.

10. Christianity speaks to the heart of the human condition.

The human condition envisioned by Christianity is one of subservience to assumed divine revelation as determined by the shamans and the priests. The human condition envisioned by Christianity is a mind imprisoned by creed unwilling to challenge the elders of the church.

To the Christian church humans are born evil and will act evil as a matter of existence. And the evil perpetrated by us humans is non-belief, non-obedience to the dictates of the power priests, independent thought and action not sanctioned by the church. And for this evil you must burn in hell forever. Unless … you bow and empty your wallet.

Christianity is not addressing the human condition, it is still trying to enslave it. Christianity is known evil. Like all religions, there are no redeeming qualities in efforts to enslave the human mind and bend it to its will.

There are no reasons to NOT write off Christianity.

I like this guy on YouTube. He defends the Bible very well.

Of course you do, Phat. You are part of the choir he is talking to. His treatment is all fantasy and articles of faith, insistence on myth and wishful thinking. No reality to any of it to cause you any concerns, Phat.

But, Phat, his arguments are juvenile, debunked decades ago, and wholly unsophisticated and uninspiring. This reads as an awkward child’s excuse for his favorite wet dream and defends nothing very well at all.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

Replies to this message:
 Message 250 by Phat, posted 04-11-2021 9:28 AM AZPaul3 has responded
 Message 255 by Phat, posted 04-14-2021 9:31 AM AZPaul3 has responded

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 15457
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 250 of 465 (885396)
04-11-2021 9:28 AM
Reply to: Message 249 by AZPaul3
04-11-2021 2:29 AM


Re: Sundae Service Sermon
AZ writes:

Defending trivialities. Bible de-thumpers using trivialities to attack. Neither addresses the problems reality presents for the evil of the bible. Trivialities don’t matter. The overall theme, the evil of the Abrahamic tribal war god, the evil that subsumes every book in the tome, should be the subject, well beyond the trivialities of syntax and minor error.

The conclusion your apologist arrives at is that the bible is god’s word because some of the book's boo-boo’s are, he declares, resolved. How blind. Resolve all the little dates and names you want. The problem of its evil remains.

The evil does not come from the Bible. The evil comes from the people.
Humans in trouble are likely, if the basis of belief is within them, to seek comfort from their misery in their acculturated religion.
I agree. The Bible is a record of humans and their usage and misusage of their religion.

One cliche which I recall as being apt is the fact that Jesus desires relationship and not religion.

Regardless, he neglects to recognize that the same motivation to escape life’s hardships happens in every culture with every religion.
True, but the mistake many people make is assuming that all gods are equally relevant or irrelevant. (In my belief)
The political power of the European church made the cultural references to Jesus ubiquitous. If some temporal category change is the evidence then it is the Roman Catholic Church, 500 years into their reign, which influenced the calendar, not your Jesus.
IF my Jesus was a cultural meme and a product of human thinking, you will win the argument and religion will eventually disappear. Tangle and you can celebrate in a pub somewhere. But if Jesus is who he says He is, you will encounter Him some day, either through judgement or through forgiveness. So will all of the other beliefs, all of the other religions, and all of the humans on this planet, regardless of what they believe. God is not simply a product of our imagination.
The overall theme, the evil of the Abrahamic tribal war god, the evil that subsumes every book in the tome, should be the subject, well beyond the trivialities of syntax and minor error.
Warring people do crazy and desperate things. The culture of that time was very territorial and warlike. We hope not to see it again, but if the global warming scenarios of global food scarcity come to fruition, you wont find people huddled at a big table seeking consensus among desperate people groups.
Also, all the science says this course of events is not possible for a complex biological organism that is dead. Invoking majik is not historical. It’s charlatanism.

Science is not a power unto itself. Science is only as alive and influential as the people who use it. I predict that some day when desperate people again turn to "myths" for comfort that science will try and make them stop doing that. (Rather, those holding the concept of science in their minds who also reject the idea of God. ) This alone will lead to further wars.


"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain "
***
“…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”- Dr.John Lennox

“The whole war between the atheist and the theist comes down to this: the atheist believes a 'what' created the universe; the theist believes a 'who' created the universe.”
- Criss Jami, Killo

“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” — Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You
(1894).


This message is a reply to:
 Message 249 by AZPaul3, posted 04-11-2021 2:29 AM AZPaul3 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 251 by AZPaul3, posted 04-11-2021 11:46 AM Phat has acknowledged this reply
 Message 252 by Rahvin, posted 04-14-2021 12:03 AM Phat has not yet responded
 Message 253 by jar, posted 04-14-2021 6:50 AM Phat has responded

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 5838
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.5


(2)
Message 251 of 465 (885399)
04-11-2021 11:46 AM
Reply to: Message 250 by Phat
04-11-2021 9:28 AM


Re: Sundae Service Sermon
The evil does not come from the Bible. The evil comes from the people.

And the attack on Capitol Hill did not come from Trump either.

True, but the mistake many people make is assuming that all gods are equally relevant or irrelevant.

Since none of them exist in actuality that means that all gods are equally irrelevant.

IF my Jesus was a cultural meme and a product of human thinking, you will win the argument and religion will eventually disappear. Tangle and you can celebrate in a pub somewhere.

Hey, Tangle, it's suds time. Phat's paying.

God is not simply a product of our imagination.

Not only are they imagination, your gods are the product of millennia of the Big Lie perpetrated by generations of charlatans and power priests. Like the safety of cigarettes the Big Lie repeated often can make you believe anything.


Eschew obfuscation. Habituate elucidation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 250 by Phat, posted 04-11-2021 9:28 AM Phat has acknowledged this reply

  
Rahvin
Member (Idle past 3 days)
Posts: 3966
Joined: 07-01-2005


(2)
Message 252 of 465 (885466)
04-14-2021 12:03 AM
Reply to: Message 250 by Phat
04-11-2021 9:28 AM


Re: Sundae Service Sermon
quote:
Science is not a power unto itself. Science is only as alive and influential as the people who use it. I predict that some day when desperate people again turn to "myths" for comfort that science will try and make them stop doing that. (Rather, those holding the concept of science in their minds who also reject the idea of God. ) This alone will lead to further wars.

After all these years, I still dont think you understand what science is.

Science is a method. Specifically, it's the best known method to distinguish fact from fiction and account for inherent biases and experimental flukes.

You treat science like some political bloc that has policies and influence. It's not. Science is a method, and generously a body of knowledge accumulated through the application of that method.

Science doesnt "try and make" anyone do or not do anything. Science is a method for distinguishing fact from fiction. The most reliable, practical method known to humanity. But it's just a method.

Science is the pursuit of truth - more accurate, the pursuit of fact. The key notion of science is to seek facts and distinguish them from fantasy. If some "comforting myth" is actually factually accurate, science will help us determine that. If that myth is not factually accurate, science will help us determine that. Rational people want to believe claims and models that are factually true and not believe claims and models that are factually inaccurate - a fancy way to say false. But that's a matter of rationality and people; you (the general you, though also you personally) can make yourself believe anything, regardless of how well that belief matches up to reality. If a myth is factually accurate, I want to believe that the myth is factually accurate. if the myth is not factually accurate...why would you want to believe it is?

Science doesnt make anyone do anything. Science is a method that helps us distinguish fact from fiction. If your beliefs align with fact, you'll be able to make more accurate predictions about the real world. Science cannot destroy truth; it can only destroy lies. Yes, scientists make mistakes - science is not scientists. Science is a method, and its application corrects mistakes eventually. It's a self-correcting method, because applying it testably and verifiable distinguishes fact from fiction.

If you feel that science, a method that distinguishes fact from fiction, is compelling you to disbelieve a favored belief....that likely means your belief is false. And why would you want to continue to hold a false belief? Even a comforting one?

Edited by Rahvin, : Reverted italics formatting at the end. Also hold, not fold.


“The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it.” - Francis Bacon

"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers

“A world that can be explained even with bad reasons is a familiar world. But, on the other hand, in a universe suddenly divested of illusions and lights, man feels an alien, a stranger. His exile is without remedy since he is deprived of the memory of a lost home or the hope of a promised land. This divorce between man and his life, the actor and his setting, is properly the feeling of absurdity.” – Albert Camus

"...the pious hope that by combining numerous little turds of variously tainted data, one can obtain a valuable result; but in fact, the outcome is merely a larger than average pile of shit." - Barash, David 1995...

"Many that live deserve death. And some die that deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then be not too eager to deal out death in the name of justice, fearing for your own safety. Even the wise cannot see all ends." - Gandalf, J. R. R. Tolkien: The Lord Of the Rings

"The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death."
1 Corinthians 15:26King James Version (KJV)

Nihil supernum


This message is a reply to:
 Message 250 by Phat, posted 04-11-2021 9:28 AM Phat has not yet responded

  
jar
Member
Posts: 33343
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 3.1


Message 253 of 465 (885467)
04-14-2021 6:50 AM
Reply to: Message 250 by Phat
04-11-2021 9:28 AM


The Bill will get paid
Phat writes:

I predict that some day when desperate people again turn to "myths" for comfort that science will try and make them stop doing that.

Science cannot make anyone do anything and history shows (particularly Christian history) exactly what happens when the people abandon science and reason and turn to myths for comfort.

When Christian Europe turned away from the enlightened science based Islamic Caliphate of what is now Spain darkness descended over Europe. ********* and poverty and suffering and Inquisition reigned.

The bill always gets paid Phat.

Abandon the scientific method and trust in belief and the bill WILL still get paid in deaths, poverty, sickness, famine, war ...

... all the things that Biblical Christians hope for but without any intervention from any god to protect them.

Continue to place SOURCE over content and you will simply get to pay the bill with suffering.

NMP anymore.

Edited by jar, : fix sub-title


My Website: My Website

This message is a reply to:
 Message 250 by Phat, posted 04-11-2021 9:28 AM Phat has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 254 by Phat, posted 04-14-2021 8:53 AM jar has responded

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 15457
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 254 of 465 (885469)
04-14-2021 8:53 AM
Reply to: Message 253 by jar
04-14-2021 6:50 AM


Re: The Bill will get paid
Phat writes:

I predict that some day when desperate people again turn to "myths" for comfort that science will try and make them stop doing that.

jar writes:

Science cannot make anyone do anything and history shows (particularly Christian history) exactly what happens when the people abandon science and reason and turn to myths for comfort.

When Christian Europe turned away from the enlightened science based Islamic Caliphate of what is now Spain darkness descended over Europe. Ignorance and poverty and suffering and Inquisition reigned.The bill always gets paid Phat.

Now this I agree with. I don't predict the dire future of war and struggle based on what some apologist told me. I believe the scenarios which I describe based on several things. One of them is logic, reason, and reality.

You and I disagree as to whether GOD as a source exists and, if so, is interacting in any way with humans. You seem to think that we as a collective human species will do far better by "throwing Him away" and taking responsibility for ourselves. What irritates me about your belief is that you have never had a relationship of any kind with SOURCE (The Living and Eternal Christ) and instead were taught and agree with, and teach that WE the people need to have a relationship with (science) and reality vs Fantasy.

Abandon the scientific method and trust in belief and the bill WILL still get paid in deaths, poverty, sickness, famine, war ...
Im not suggesting anything of the sort. I (and Raphael, apparantly) believe in the value of science and of the methodology employed. Speaking for myself, but imagining that Raph would agree, I do NOT plan on throwing God(SOURCE) away any time soon. I feel that it will be a mistake for all of you.
Please note, however, that in my mind there is a vast difference between throwing GOD(Jesus) away and throwing MYTH (Religion) away.

AZPaul started this topic because he is strongly against Theism and Belief, as if it is a threat to progress in general, humans in particular, and our future as a species. I can see his point and his heart as a human concerned with making the right decisions individually as well as sociologically. He knows darn well that global warming WILL BE the new Armageddon and a very real threat to our collective survival, not due to the planet dying but due to the people surviving the challenge.

jar writes:

Abandon the scientific method and trust in belief and the bill WILL still get paid in deaths, poverty, sickness, famine, war ...

... all the things that Biblical Christians hope for but without any intervention from any god to protect them.

By that if you mean that we cant count on God to save our asses if we keep doing irrational things, I totally agree. I recently read (or am reading, rather) an interesting book which I shall share: The Market As God by Harvey Cox. I recommend looking it up and reading the intro.

The basic point of the book is that we humans are modern day idolators. We trust in money and have in fact deified it. Thus one could say that people who trust in economics to save us from poverty and a higher bill, placing Money As SOURCE is another mistake that will haunt us while alive. I myself realize that all of the money in the world cannot buy my health or even my sanity....no matter which God I lay it in front of. God Himself can, however. Don't be too quick to ignore SOURCE. Also beware of efforts to form a global consensus. I worry about that. Perhaps I need to throw the DOGMA away.

Continue to place SOURCE over content and you will simply get to pay the bill with suffering.

NMP anymore.

What I meant about desperate people turning to myths, I envisioned as a response to a growing global crises. I feel that many Biblical Christians simply do not trust a secular humanist, educated group of liberal politicians to preserve our familiar way of life. I feel they will place their values in a kinder gentler, all inclusive (and non-religious) global consensus. Where the science comes in is when they declare a social war against the beliefs which judge some of them as outliers(You need salvation! Kamala and Ocasio-Cortez are gaia witches...they value the survival of the planet over belief in Jesus) rather than what they claim to be, which is simply caring humans. The bill will indeed get paid, but we (meaning that I am speaking for the US Conservatives) will NOT pay it alone. WE will make China and Brazil, etc. pay their fair share. (Which in my mind is as big of a percentage as US conservatives are asked to pay.

Again, why? Because China, as it enters and entered the industrial age, is generating far more pollution than the US EVER did. Back when we did it, we had 80-150 million entitled people. They now have close to a billion. Dont kid yourself that they shouldnt pay a large percentage of this hypothetical "bill" you mention.


"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain "
***
“…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”- Dr.John Lennox

“The whole war between the atheist and the theist comes down to this: the atheist believes a 'what' created the universe; the theist believes a 'who' created the universe.”
- Criss Jami, Killo

“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” — Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You
(1894).


This message is a reply to:
 Message 253 by jar, posted 04-14-2021 6:50 AM jar has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 256 by AZPaul3, posted 04-14-2021 10:38 AM Phat has acknowledged this reply
 Message 257 by jar, posted 04-14-2021 11:32 AM Phat has responded

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 15457
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 255 of 465 (885470)
04-14-2021 9:31 AM
Reply to: Message 249 by AZPaul3
04-11-2021 2:29 AM


Re: Sundae Service Sermon
AZ, you do have some good points and I will respond more completely to this post later on. For now, though, lets deal with this.
AZ writes:

Even the most basic of moralities we as humans practice (empathy, compassion, etc.), born of the social mores learned from the evolution of our social species, are subjective. Subject to change from social pressures.

And what authority, force, or motive drives these social pressures? Lets get to the bottom of who you think God would be, should He exist?

"A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." ~Mark Twain "
***
“…far from science having buried God, not only do the results of science point towards his existence, but the scientific enterprise itself is validated by his existence.”- Dr.John Lennox

“The whole war between the atheist and the theist comes down to this: the atheist believes a 'what' created the universe; the theist believes a 'who' created the universe.”
- Criss Jami, Killo

“The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” — Leo Tolstoy, The Kingdom of God is Within You
(1894).


This message is a reply to:
 Message 249 by AZPaul3, posted 04-11-2021 2:29 AM AZPaul3 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 258 by AZPaul3, posted 04-14-2021 11:35 AM Phat has responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021