For this I apologize, that I've not studied science in these past days, nor logic, nor defense of the faith, whereby I may formulate sound and valid arguments. But now I will argue the best I can, being as clear as I can, in the hope that this will be good enough for you all. And for not replying to many comments, I ask you to forgive me. I will answer a point conveyed within them.
I say that all things, physical things, possess both behavior and properties, which in nature are not beyond the spatial and temporal. For in space do they move, and in space do they change; likewise through time do they do these things. And all things from interaction among them, emerge from their working together. And without emergence from their working together, they have no emergent property.
Now a mind is sentient, and experiences sight, feeling, thought, and more, which things from our point of view are composed of qualia, something possessed by no things indivisible. For these things are quanta, with behaviors and properties, not in themselves having qualia.
Therefore seeing that from things indivisible, there is no grouping of their working together, which is able to generate things we know as qualia, how it is possible this is a property emerging from physical processes? For the physical processes depend on components, which themselves depend on the physical; at the lowest level is dependence on things indivisible, which have no property with resemblance to qualia. Therefore how does the qualia emerge, which, by no steps of grouping nor working together, can be the result of the things of which they consist.
Sorry for any lack of clarity. By no means was it intended, neither in a style more plain would my mind explain it more easily.
Edited by Christian7, : No reason given.Edited by Christian7, : No reason given.
Edited by Christian7, : No reason given.
Edited by Christian7, : No reason given.
Edited by Christian7, : No reason given.